Filip Chytil
Registered User
- Mar 3, 2014
- 7,249
- 8,889
eliotte Friedman says Quinn Hughes is available. Lafreniere for Hughes
Puck wasn't going in if no one touched it and the penalty was committed on Kakko who was the one on the "breakaway" even if he didn't have clear possession of the puck. The rule is about the referee's discretion if a player commits a penalty that in his judgment prevents a goal with the net empty, which was clearly what this was - possession isn't a requirement. It'd be the same if a flat footed defenseman who was the last man back hacked down a full steam forward at the blue line with the puck behind him sitting in the slot and the net empty. And if I'm remembering correctly (it's been a while since the last time I referee'd a game, and these obscurities tend to fade over time), the referee is only allowed to make this call with the goalie pulled - I don't believe the rules allow for this with an "empty" net when the goalie is still there - even in the event of the goalie mishandling a puck at the circle, falling down out of the play, etc. and the D takes a penalty to save a goal.They must have ruled that Kakko was in possession (by position) as he was shielding the puck when DeAngelo whacked him. Isn't there some off side rule that has similar possession of the puck logic? Maybe someone who knows the rules can chime in? This is an interesting one for sure
e: maybe even icing can be used here, they blow icing when the position is clear that the D will touch the puck first.
How is that Lindgren’s goal? That’s on the Mount Rushmore of Kakko screwed.
Kravtsov too.f*** this league. That’s Kakko’s goal. He will ALWAYS have one more goal than the nhl.com stats say in my posts.
-4 (up to that point) will make you that frustrated.That's some chop by DeAngelo.
I stopped watching for a bit, was waiting for them to get back on track so I may not have an accurate take but it seems like now we are scoring on odd man rushes/breakaways, cross ice passes like Goodrow to Panarin, whereas the beginning of the season we rarely had those chances.The Rangers had several highlight worthy goals. Even Vesey's goal would stand out in other games. Trouba's was great too, and that's aside from Miller's and Goodrow's breakaways.
I’m hesitant to wade into this aspect of the conversation, but people don’t seem to realize that there is no such thing as an easy game in the NHL. Unless we’re talking about the 80s Oilers, most NHL teams wouldn’t have an “easy” time beating most AHL teams. The margins are not that big in a game like hockey where goal scoring is rare and random.Flyers are barely an NHL team and we made it look very difficult , and the kids got no minutes.
Teams have off nights and get blown out, of course, but on an average day where both teams are playing at a normal level, it’s not going to look easy. Especially when a HALAK is playing.
So that would be 3 from our dmen. Our d have really been contributing lately. Lots of points.Trouba and Lindgren with their 1sts.... Kakko getting screwed.
Okay, so fill me in @Machinehead .Ah shit
eliotte Friedman says Quinn Hughes is available. Lafreniere for Hughes
He's just finding his stride after what? 8 years? Who's to say there isn't a 20 goal scorer in him? Wouldn't that be something?But Vesey is breaking out!
You're not being a Debbie Downer... you're being a realist. The organization has committed to scrubs winning mid-December games against lottery teams instead of developing its 1, 2, 9, and 21 overall picks. An organization that sent a letter out about being patient for a rebuild and rebuilding the right way, finally lands the kind of talent in the draft its always needed up front, and they're completely destroying those players' development so that Barclay Goodrow, Jimmy Vesey, and Vincent Trocheck can revitalize their careers and so that Panarin can be happy and so that Zibenjad and Kreider can remain butt buddies.Kid line 11mins.
I don't want to sound like a debbie downer but wtf?