HF Habs: Flames or Panthers 1st Round Pick 2025

Habs7631

Registered User
Feb 28, 2017
385
930
You can forget Florida missing the playoffs that's for sure.

When the season was starting I had a little hope that they would have a down season after back-to-back trip to the finals and losing a couple players to free agency.

But even when they are missing players they look so good. Their forecheck is unreal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Lurk

LaP

Registered User
Jun 27, 2012
26,252
20,538
Quebec City, Canada
When the season was starting I had a little hope that they would have a down season after back-to-back trip to the finals and losing a couple players to free agency.

But even when they are missing players they look so good. Their forecheck is unreal.
They did not lose anybody that important. Lundell is underrated by this board imo. Luostarinen is a very good middle six player imo. If he had more TOI in a lesser team he would do 20 goals and 45ish points. Matthew Samoskevich is a pretty good porspect. Schmidt is a solid vet add he wont support the offense as much as Montour but defensively he'll be solid for them. They need a quarterback but that's something they could adress at the deadline.
 

FrankMTL

Registered User
Jan 6, 2005
12,543
14,459
Dustin Wolf is everything Levi was hyped to be but never was.

Pretty small by goalie standards also, 6 foot and 166 pounds.

Anyways, I don't see how this is sustainable for the Flames...Their top scorers have 10 points in 19 games, but I guess they do have some decent depth. Even at that, they're in a weird situation where they should be rebuilding because their roster is mostly old but they're still winning games. It reminds me of the Habs where it's almost like they were just good enough to be in the running to make the playoffs but nowhere near good enough to get anywhere close to the Stanley Cup.
 
Last edited:

overlords

#DefundCBC
Aug 16, 2008
33,197
13,154
The City
Pretty small by goalie standards also, 6 foot and 166 pounds.

Anyways, I don't see how this is sustainable for the Flames...Their top scorers have 10 points in 19 games, but I guess they do have some decent depth. Even at that, they're in a weird situation where they should be rebuilding because their roster is mostly old but they're still winning games. It reminds me of the Habs where it's almost like they were just good enough to be in the running to make the playoffs but nowhere near good enough to get anywhere close to the Stanley Cup.
I've seen quite a few flames fans complain that their owner wouldn't allow a true rebuild.
 

morhilane

Registered User
Feb 28, 2021
8,992
11,633
Pretty small by goalie standards also, 6 foot and 166 pounds.

Anyways, I don't see how this is sustainable for the Flames...Their top scorers have 10 points in 19 games, but I guess they do have some decent depth. Even at that, they're in a weird situation where they should be rebuilding because their roster is mostly old but they're still winning games. It reminds me of the Habs where it's almost like they were just good enough to be in the running to make the playoffs but nowhere near good enough to get anywhere close to the Stanley Cup.
Flames offensive metrics are near bottom 10 in the league, their expected goals for is below expected goals against, their special units are crap (below bottom 10 for both). 6 RW in 10 wins with 2 SO wins.

It's sustainable as long as their goalies can sustain it.:popcorn:
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad