- Oct 26, 2006
- 18,751
- 12,006
If that was supposed to be a cool metaphor ....it wasn't.
It's an apt metaphor. Whether it's cool or not to you doesn't interest me in the slightest.
If that was supposed to be a cool metaphor ....it wasn't.
Your obsession is hilarious, but your arguments - and those of others like you - are reminiscent of army generals in a battle who, faced with asymmetrical tactics and unexpected strategies from a desperate opponent, get red-faced and sputter, "But they can't DO that!" as their flanks are getting rolled up.
It's an apt metaphor. Whether it's cool or not to you doesn't interest me in the slightest.
You're way offf base. Here's where your argument starts and ends. The only other team who has this level of "insight" is the hurricanes. Hnmmm another team with financial issues. Shocker. But how many teams have 18million dollars of their cap tied up in players who can't play. Only one. Can you figure out who?
Why? Other GMs are not any different. They would be using same or different loopholes as soon as they find a loophole.
Wow, hats to to Arizona's new GM, he's done an amazing job in just a few months!
Don't forget about the GM in Detroit who's player waited to be traded before he "officially" retired from the NHL. The same GM who will likely give Johan Franzen the Chris Pronger treatment.No, no, he's right.
I'm sure the GM in Philadelphia - a team that traded Chris Pronger three years after he stopped playing - was furious about the Bolland trade. Likewise, I'd imagine the GM in Boston - a team that once traded Tim Thomas while he was holed up in a cabin in Colorado - was livid. And, best of all, I'm sure the management in Toronto - WHO ONCE TRADED FOR THE HUSK OF NATHAN HORTON - was besides themselves when they heard of this trade.
Several gms of higher revenue teams were pissed about this trade. But in due defence , they are not hostile towards Arizona. Just hostile with the mockery of the cap loopholes
I have to say, he's been solid at taking on zero/minimal cost contracts that free up space for other teams and being paid in future talent. Brian Burke was one of the early vocal members willing to sell cap space, he wasn't so successful. Chayka on the other hand has been doing it masterfully.
Seems like more than just the skaters on the ice will be getting younger. Chayka's putting on a clinic!
Don't forget about the GM in Detroit who's player waited to be traded before he "officially" retired from the NHL. The same GM who will likely give Johan Franzen the Chris Pronger treatment.
There is absolutely no purpose for moving Bolland's contract and clearing up 9+ million in cap space unless you have another move planned.
You should come down for the winter. Partial season ticket plans are on sale nowThe main point of what I said about the big mac is that we are paying AAA steak prices for a hamburger, and other fans are getting the same product with food stamps.
It was actually a great metaphor. Poor teams have to be creative. Rebuilding teams should do all they can to maximize assets. 3 2015 1sts + 2 2016 1sts in Arizona to augment the young core already in place. That's how you overhaul a team!If that was supposed to be a cool metaphor ....it wasn't.
Several gms of higher revenue teams were pissed about this trade. But in due defence , they are not hostile towards Arizona. Just hostile with the mockery of the cap loopholes
The prices of a big Mac vary between American and Canadian based off of food cost variation
Bettman create the Canadian assistance plan for the four smaller teams. It wasn't much but it was something. Around a couple million dollars a year
Do you have a link of these several pissed gms?
I thought it was much more that than, but a couple of million bucks in the 80's would be a hell of a lot more now. The owners passed revenue sharing so it is what it is.
Who cares? Cap space is an assett. In a few years when these young players hit their prime we will worry but we dont need to now.
Maybe they change the rules saying you need to spend real money between $50 and 70 ,until that time this is how it works.
We dont need you coming on every single Yote trade forum with your " what a horrible franchise" we heard it all before mostly from you.
Your team has all the cash in the world and you usually have a worse record than us.
No, no, he's right.
I'm sure the GM in Philadelphia - a team that traded Chris Pronger three years after he stopped playing - was furious about the Bolland trade. Likewise, I'd imagine the GM in Boston - a team that once traded Tim Thomas while he was holed up in a cabin in Colorado - was livid. And, best of all, I'm sure the management in Toronto - WHO ONCE TRADED FOR THE HUSK OF NATHAN HORTON - was besides themselves when they heard of this trade.
Keep it on topic. Talk about the trade.
I'm a bit confused on these trade the Coyotes have made. If they've taken on so much money in cap space, why aren't they on the hook for the actually paid contract, not just a fraction of the money owed?