I am toxic
. . . even in small doses
It is a shame that this thread will be closed*, as there is a shit ton to discuss.
One lesson that has been overlooked is that the (at the time) step-father contacted Hockey Canada the day of the alleged gang rape. This allowed Hockey Canada to engage all their rape culture enabling resources, including contacting their risk manager, their victim-smearing lawyers, and at least one of the accused rapists who then pressured the victim to end the police involvement. Lesson being, don't contact anyone but your own lawyer and the police. Which one first, I have yet to figure out, people in this thread could shed some light on the matter but it will be closed shortly, and prematurely.
Which leads to the next point that hasn't been fully discussed. I was no doubt mistaken earlier that the two protected witnesses would be players present yet not charged. The publication ban of their names was at the request of the prosecutor, and as @Yukon Joe pointed out, a publication ban is to protect the identity of the victim.
Since the sequence of events of how this investigation has played out appears to now have become part of the case, it seems far more likely that both the mother and (at the time) step-father would be witnesses, both having first-hand knowledge of the victim following the alleged gang rape so maybe such testimony is something the prosecutors may want to keep on the table.
I've already brought up Cal Foote's agent's behaviour, and there is lots more issues that should be addressed, including exactly who at Hockey Canada contacted the accused rapists to help them out.
*who am I kidding? This thread has been successfully derailed to a discussion about sports movies, best it had been shut down yesterday, instead of making a mockery of discussion about serious allegations of gang rape, institutional complicity, and police ineptitude if not worse.
One lesson that has been overlooked is that the (at the time) step-father contacted Hockey Canada the day of the alleged gang rape. This allowed Hockey Canada to engage all their rape culture enabling resources, including contacting their risk manager, their victim-smearing lawyers, and at least one of the accused rapists who then pressured the victim to end the police involvement. Lesson being, don't contact anyone but your own lawyer and the police. Which one first, I have yet to figure out, people in this thread could shed some light on the matter but it will be closed shortly, and prematurely.
Which leads to the next point that hasn't been fully discussed. I was no doubt mistaken earlier that the two protected witnesses would be players present yet not charged. The publication ban of their names was at the request of the prosecutor, and as @Yukon Joe pointed out, a publication ban is to protect the identity of the victim.
Since the sequence of events of how this investigation has played out appears to now have become part of the case, it seems far more likely that both the mother and (at the time) step-father would be witnesses, both having first-hand knowledge of the victim following the alleged gang rape so maybe such testimony is something the prosecutors may want to keep on the table.
I've already brought up Cal Foote's agent's behaviour, and there is lots more issues that should be addressed, including exactly who at Hockey Canada contacted the accused rapists to help them out.
*who am I kidding? This thread has been successfully derailed to a discussion about sports movies, best it had been shut down yesterday, instead of making a mockery of discussion about serious allegations of gang rape, institutional complicity, and police ineptitude if not worse.