Backyard Hockey
Dealing With It
- Feb 13, 2015
- 13,841
- 5,347
20 is the new 40I'm giving Luke 40 games before I turn on him.
20 is the new 40I'm giving Luke 40 games before I turn on him.
I wanted Demidov over AL but finding RD with Size and speed is not easy so I will wait till after AL is on the ice for a few months to freak out. this next draft is strong at C and W. other then that and a few over pays on shorter term deals what would you have done massively differently. clearly bringing back AA at 2 years was a mistake. Brodie at 2 years looks questionable right now. We are going to need one of our picks to become a 70 pt forward. not sure who that is but we also need better players 4-12 and I think in a few years we will. IF AL is not a top line RD at #2 that will be pretty daming. that said Im not sold on who went #3 or # 4. AZ has been picking top 10 for how many years in row? 10? we have 3 draft so far. I also think with Forwards he has looked for guys that project as 2 way players. Nazar, Moore, Boisvert, vanneker. SAAD and Hossa we not huge producers during our CUP runs but that effected W and Losses. would you rather pay guys $5-$6 mil and have them put up 50 pts with a positive +- or 70 pts 8mil and negative +-? Does this team need more skill, YES, does it feel like LD is a playoff winning coach NO. When stan gutted the farm system and traded away lots of 1st round picks. what are you going to do. CAT, Hagel, and Kane meant we drafted between 5-10 so would you lock them into long term deals. that is no mans land.I agree and the GM is just as bad or even worse, I don’t get this team he constructed, its Beddard which he got lucky with, and just a bunch of middle 6 guys, we need another 3 top line players if we are to win a cup and actually compete with the best. There is literally no plan for that, nothing that’s clear at least, we have nothing crazy in the pipeline and he blew the draft this year which he has a chance to get that guy to make that much needed duo. I doubt he’s smart enough to bring in guys anyone to fill those roles from free agency or trades, so what gives? Prepare for painful years ahead boys. I am not saying this cause of watching this game, the team has improved but it’s not a winning formula I don’t see the grand plan, it’s a clueless GM putting some crap together and hoping it sticks.
last season i was at maybe 75-85% lack of talent. this season is still young, but i would ballpark probably about 50-60% lack of talent so far, and that number will only continue to fall with performances like last night's.If you guys had to put a % on it, what % of how bad the Hawks were/are this season and the past season due to Richardson and what % is due to the Hawks just having a bad roster?
With a better coach how much better could this team actually be?
Last year? 95%team 5%coachingIf you guys had to put a % on it, what % of how bad the Hawks were/are this season and the past season due to Richardson and what % is due to the Hawks just having a bad roster?
With a better coach how much better could this team actually be?
Not sure I disagree but something needs to be about these piss poor starts and to me that falls primarily on the coaching staff.Last year? 95%team 5%coaching
This year? If nothing changes from last year. 90/10
A coach can only do or say so much to get his players ready to play. Players need to be motivated themselves, or find something that motivates them. Only thing the coach can do is threaten players ice times, and that's not something LR is afforded with no one else to play in their place.Not sure I disagree but something needs to be about these piss poor starts and to me that falls primarily on the coaching staff.
The Dynasty Hawks weren't starting games on time or playing a full 60 minutes all the time either. I'm convinced that's just a hockey-ism and an unrealistic expectation, personally.Not sure I disagree but something needs to be about these piss poor starts and to me that falls primarily on the coaching staff.
I agree and the GM is just as bad or even worse, I don’t get this team he constructed, its Beddard which he got lucky with, and just a bunch of middle 6 guys, we need another 3 top line players if we are to win a cup and actually compete with the best. There is literally no plan for that, nothing that’s clear at least, we have nothing crazy in the pipeline and he blew the draft this year which he has a chance to get that guy to make that much needed duo. I doubt he’s smart enough to bring in guys anyone to fill those roles from free agency or trades, so what gives? Prepare for painful years ahead boys. I am not saying this cause of watching this game, the team has improved but it’s not a winning formula I don’t see the grand plan, it’s a clueless GM putting some crap together and hoping it sticks.
Actually, you want that coach in place before you're ready to win. Instilling work ethic and culture for these young players is critical.It was the 1st game of the season... even with all the improvements we have a bad team.
Richardson is not a good coach, but you don't fire him until you see that team is ready to win. KD will hire a coach once there is need to do it. This is still a rebuild. This team will improve and get better over time. I doubt it happens before next season and we will see Nazar, Korchinski and Lev at the end of the season.
It was the 1st game of the season... even with all the improvements we have a bad team.
Richardson is not a good coach, but you don't fire him until you see that team is ready to win. KD will hire a coach once there is need to do it. This is still a rebuild. This team will improve and get better over time. I doubt it happens before next season and we will see Nazar, Korchinski and Lev at the end of the season.
Who would you like Richardson replaced with?That was the 165th game Richardson has coached this team. Why wait any longer? He should have been fired in the offseason and replaced by just about anyone else.
I can't even imagine the culture shock this team would have had going from him to say Torts if he was available. While he's a meatball and has his issues, at least he gets his guys ready to actually play until he wears out his welcome by year 3.
Who would you like Richardson replaced with?
Its been one game and our young guys are the guys who played well in that one game.That would be up to someone smarter to decide.
But it doesn't take a smart to realize that Richardson isn't the guy to develop young players. From putting them in the wrong position, situation, or favoring terrible veterans for no justifiable reason.
Its been one game and our young guys are the guys who played well in that one game.
for 164 games they have been intentionally constructing a roster to lose games. They still have the 2nd/3rd/4th worst roster in the western conference. Hes there to get through these bad years.It's been 165 games and we are in year 3. How much more do you need to see to finally realize he ain't the guy?
Game 1 was a continuation of everything we have seen in years 1 and 2 from a coaching perspective.