I certainly agree that new ownership very well might want a fresh start with new people. The logical assumption is that they'd engage hockey knowledgeable people and consult with the league prior to making decisions.
So what are they likely to find when they do that?
1. Increased engagement with the local business community that is driving revenue increases
2. Increased fan attendance that is driving revenue increases
3. A solid young core signed to at market contracts
4. Comparatively few bad money contracts, no albatross contracts
5. A players coach loved by his players
6. A top 10 team on both special teams
7. A slim hockey ops department but some respected people in key positions
8. A consensus amongst hockey people that the team is sitting on a solid foundation
As I said, I certainly understand if new ownership brings in new people, but I do think that a review of the current situation results in a different assessment of the organization than that held by some in HF Sens land.
It's interesting because to me, a key component to Dorion's fate should be what happens with DeBrincat since he bet big on acquiring the scoring winger, and how he manages a very tight cap situation this offseason, both of those require the new ownership give him tell Jul before deciding.
For DJ, I've never been a huge fan but this is the first season where I think it's possible to get a grip on him as a coach, prior to this year he's not had the roster to really do much. November really threw a wrench into things, injuries to key positions made an already challenging situation that much harder. We needed to quickly find chemistry with a lot of new guys, and we're still lacking a top 4 Dman (Hamonic is ok, but ideally a 3rd pair guy)
If new ownership is patient they may choose to see what Dorion can do, his offseason was actually pretty good, can he figure out that last Dman, re-sign the RFA, and keep us under the cap?
Can DJ get this team playing to it's potential? I'm seeing some positive progress in our end, and combined special teams are as good as I can remember. If we can tilt the ice in our favour 5v5 this team will have a realistic shot at playoffs.
I think there are better GMs and better coaches, but there are also worse ones. Change for the sake of change only makes sense when the status quo will damage the future, is that the case here, idk.