Proposal: Fire DJ Smith

Should the Sens fire DJ Smith?


  • Total voters
    176
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

bert

Registered User
Nov 11, 2002
37,576
23,898
Visit site
Just to be clear, I think we've been playing better 5v5 than our Goals for/against suggest.

I think the PP is on fire and the results match the level they are playing at

I think the PK has played on but goaltending has been bailing them out a fair bit.

Where DJ deserves credit vs the players is tough to delineate, some people want to only blame the coach, others want to only praise him.
That seems to be the angle you're taking. There's been more buy in from the players. They aren't making close to as many stupid decisions. Coaching staff made a game plan for a depleted roster which has created more structure. Both the players and the coach should take credit for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: swiftwin

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
57,161
34,907
It's disappointing you didn't read my post. It's gone down because they have had alot of injuries and frankly haven't been icing a very talented roster. Which I said in the first sentence of the post you quoted. So what you have said is factually incorrect about the roster.

There is a reason teams don't solely look at advanced stats people still actually watch the games. The puck management has been way better. For yes lower event hockey. Total shots doesn't mean anything it's the unforced errors and unnecessary risks they've cut down on. While winning hockey games which they managed to do with a banged up roster. Unless you'd prefer them to play losing hockey. Which seems like the angle of your response.
Other teams have injuries too, but I guess that's not important to you. We still, even with injuries, have a much more talented team than last year, and yet we score significantly less while allowing nearly identical goals against rates. Again, not important to you.

Instead, let's infer people don't watch the game, classy Bert.
 

bert

Registered User
Nov 11, 2002
37,576
23,898
Visit site
Other teams have injuries too, but I guess that's not important to you. We still, even with injuries, have a much more talented team than last year, and yet we score significantly less while allowing nearly identical goals against rates. Again, not important to you.

Instead, let's infer people don't watch the game, classy Bert.
You're complaining while they are winning..... Then are unable to be open to a concept that actual puck management is the reason. You're reverting to advanced analytics to say they aren't playing better vs actual hard numbers wins and goals against. While it's obvious when you watch the games they quite clearly are playing much better. Less turnovers at the blue lined and danger areas. And no they don't have a more talented roster when 3 of their top 9 forwards are out and a top pairing d man has been injured. They had an average talent level roster to begin with when healthy.

But hey keep complaining. I'd rather see more loses with mind boggling decision making because they score 5 on 5.
 

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
57,161
34,907
You're complaining while they are winning..... Then are unable to be open to a concept that actual puck management is the reason. You're reverting to advanced analytics to say they aren't playing better. While it's blatantly obvious when you watch the games they quite clearly are. Less turnovers at the blue lined and danger areas. And no they don't have a more talented roster when 3 of their top 9 forwards are out and a top pairing d man has been injured. They had an average talent level roster to begin with when healthy.
No Bert, I'm not actually complaining, I'm pointing out that not everything is perfect, and if your going to praise what's going well you need to also acknowledge what isn't. I'm using the stats to reinforce what I see on the ice, yes, we are managing the puck better in our end, but not turning over the puck in our end isn't why we struggle to score compared to earlier this year. It isn't why we score less than last year 5v5 either.

Yes. We do have a better roster than last year, go look at what we iced last season, hint, we had lots of injuries last year too.
 

Samsquanch

Raging Bull Squatch
Nov 28, 2008
8,274
5,089
Sudbury
Just to be clear, I think we've been playing better 5v5 than our Goals for/against suggest.

I think the PP is on fire and the results match the level they are playing at

I think the PK has played on but goaltending has been bailing them out a fair bit.

Where DJ deserves credit vs the players is tough to delineate, some people want to only blame the coach, others want to only praise him.
Who in here wants to only praise DJ? Can you point out even one poster that has only good things to say about him?

HFSenators has this weird obsession with calling our own people homers, fan boys, Melnyk/Dorion/DJ lovers, ect ect ect when they dont become part of the hive mind and jump on the rage bandwagon and complain with the rest of them.

Our players seem to love playing for him. Hes fixed the special teams (ie the source of so many sore spots in years past). The team is hard to play against physically. And were winning games now.

So yeah, I guess I dont share the outrage and think DJ deserves some praise right now. Not saying hes doing a perfect job out there. But its also far better a job than many here will give him credit for.
 
Last edited:

JD1

Registered User
Sep 12, 2005
16,342
10,019
In our last 19 games:
12-5-2
Points - 6th
GA/GP - 6th
PP - 2nd
PK - 3rd
SF/GP - 7th
SA/GP - 16th
FOW% - 7th

Players who have missed time during that 19 game stretch:
Norris - 19
Zub - 12
Joseph - 12
Motte - 6
Stutzle - 4

Yet the majority of the 88 pages in this thread talking about firing the coach. To do what? Get a better system that no one can articulate or explain? Every coach eventually gets fired but who's lined up to take DJ's spot and what are we hoping they'll do, under the same circumstances, that will give us better results?
A lot of people point to firing the coach or firing the GM but cannot really articulate why. We're not getting results in the W/L column and ultimately that's what it boils down to.

I do think that when PD endorses DJ it's numbers like these that he is looking at. I also think that a top down strategic review of our entire hockey operations won't necessarily point to the need to immediately remove either Dorion or Smith. However I do get that they've been here a long time and maybe some new faces are needed. If it was my decision I wouldn't remove either of them, but I could certainly understand someone choosing to do so
 

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
57,161
34,907
Who in here wants to only praise DJ? Can you point out even one poster from here that has only good things to say about DJ?
Read back, spend some time in the GDT, it's pretty clear who belongs to which groups.

HFSenators has this weird obsession with calling our own people homers, fan boys, Melnyk/Dorion/DJ lovers, ect ect ect when they dont become part of the hive mind and jump on the rage bandwagon with the rest of them.
Some obsess with calling people homes others call people haters.
Our players seem to love playing for him. Hes fixed the special teams (ie the source of so many sore spots in years past). The team is hard to play against physically. And were winning games now.
Did he fix special teams or did Dorion? It's not a simple black and white question. We've got some really high power options on the PP, it should be doing well. Credit were it's due though, even if it should be good based on the personnel, I do believe it's punched above it's weight, DJ and his staff likely have something to due with that. That said I find we give up a lot of shorthanded chances, minor quibble but that needs to be cleaned up.

As for the PK, I think Talbot and Forsberg probably deserve more credit than DJ. I see a pk that allows a lot of good chances, we've bent but thx to goaltending haven't broken.

So yeah, I guess I dont share the outrage and think DJ deserves some praise right now. Not saying hes doing a perfect job out there. But its also far better a job than many here will give him credit for.
I've got no issues giving credit where its due, apparently I'm not allowed to point out where we still struggle though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OD99

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
57,161
34,907
A lot of people point to firing the coach or firing the GM but cannot really articulate why. We're not getting results in the W/L column and ultimately that's what it boils down to.
History tells us that tends to be why coaches get fired.
I do think that when PD endorses DJ it's numbers like these that he is looking at. I also think that a top down strategic review of our entire hockey operations won't necessarily point to the need to immediately remove either Dorion or Smith. However I do get that they've been here a long time and maybe some new faces are needed. If it was my decision I wouldn't remove either of them, but I could certainly understand someone choosing to do so
I think with new ownership new faces are inevitable, but I suppose if we make a push to finish the season it might be delayed. Dorion is in a tough spot with no capspace for next year, and some longstanding holes in the backend needing addressing. If he goes I can't see DJ sticking around,
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bileur

JD1

Registered User
Sep 12, 2005
16,342
10,019
Read back, spend some time in the GDT, it's pretty clear who belongs to which groups.


Some obsess with calling people homes others call people haters.

Did he fix special teams or did Dorion? It's not a simple black and white question. We've got some really high power options on the PP, it should be doing well. Credit were it's due though, even if it should be good based on the personnel, I do believe it's punched above it's weight, DJ and his staff likely have something to due with that. That said I find we give up a lot of shorthanded chances, minor quibble but that needs to be cleaned up.

As for the PK, I think Talbot and Forsberg probably deserve more credit than DJ. I see a pk that allows a lot of good chances, we've bent but thx to goaltending haven't broken.


I've got no issues giving credit where its due, apparently I'm not allowed to point out where we still struggle though.
I think one of the biggest areas we struggle with defensively is being able to clear but not clearing. I'm totally guessing but I'd think at least 25% of the goals against happen when we had a chance to clear, didn't, that causes running around and exhausted players, the other team gets fresh legs cycled in and boom we give one up. Apart from that there's very little struggle in our end imo. And I think the root cause of this is inexperience
 

Samsquanch

Raging Bull Squatch
Nov 28, 2008
8,274
5,089
Sudbury
Read back, spend some time in the GDT, it's pretty clear who belongs to which groups.


Some obsess with calling people homes others call people haters.

Did he fix special teams or did Dorion? It's not a simple black and white question. We've got some really high power options on the PP, it should be doing well. Credit were it's due though, even if it should be good based on the personnel, I do believe it's punched above it's weight, DJ and his staff likely have something to due with that. That said I find we give up a lot of shorthanded chances, minor quibble but that needs to be cleaned up.

As for the PK, I think Talbot and Forsberg probably deserve more credit than DJ. I see a pk that allows a lot of good chances, we've bent but thx to goaltending haven't broken.


I've got no issues giving credit where its due, apparently I'm not allowed to point out where we still struggle though.

Special teams are where coaching has the biggest impact. Thats a known fact.

So if you cant even give him credit for having fantastic special teams, then there's no point in debating how good of a coach he is with you. The goal post is going to keep moving to wherever you need it to be that day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: R We A Team and JD1

The Devilish Buffoon

Registered User
Dec 24, 2018
12,720
11,507
Special teams are where coaching has the biggest impact. Thats a known fact.

So if you cant even give him credit for having fantastic special teams, then there's no point in debating how good of a coach he is with you.
I don’t say this as a notch against DJ, because he is responsible for his staff and they are all one organism, but the assistants deserve credit, too. I was watching the CBJ stream yesterday and they were raving about Payne running 20 set o-zone plays at ES and PP in the morning skate, saying watching that made it clear as to why our PP is so good. Obviously the players are a big part of that, too.

They also spoke about how much the players seem to adore DJ and how impressive they found DJ. I watch away streams a decent amount and this is a pretty common refrain. He is far from perfect but I think he is competent and the respect he garners from our guys is not to be overlooked.

I think one of the biggest areas we struggle with defensively is being able to clear but not clearing. I'm totally guessing but I'd think at least 25% of the goals against happen when we had a chance to clear, didn't, that causes running around and exhausted players, the other team gets fresh legs cycled in and boom we give one up. Apart from that there's very little struggle in our end imo. And I think the root cause of this is inexperience
Agreed 100%, a disproportionate # of our GAs follow an unforced error.
 

Samsquanch

Raging Bull Squatch
Nov 28, 2008
8,274
5,089
Sudbury
I don’t say this as a notch against DJ, because he is responsible for his staff and they are all one organism, but the assistants deserve credit, too. I was watching the CBJ stream yesterday and they were raving about Payne running 20 set o-zone plays at ES and PP in the morning skate, saying watching that made it clear as to why our PP is so good. Obviously the players are a big part of that, too.

They also spoke about how much the players seem to adore DJ and how impressive they found DJ. I watch away streams a decent amount and this is a pretty common refrain. He is far from perfect but I think he is competent and the respect he garners from our guys is not to be overlooked.


Agreed 100%, a disproportionate # of our GAs follow an unforced error.

Totally agree that its our assistants who deserve a lot of the credit - but as you said DJ is responsible for them, and its all one organization pulling together in the same direction. So its still a feather in his cap.
 

The Devilish Buffoon

Registered User
Dec 24, 2018
12,720
11,507
Totally agree that its our assistants who deserve a lot of the credit - but as you said DJ is responsible for them, and its all one organization pulling together in the same direction. So its still a feather in his cap.
100%. While my comment was more about singing the praises of unsung/out of sight contributors, it is also implicitly a compliment to the job DJ has done.
 

JimmySpaetzle

Registered User
May 16, 2014
1,289
1,313
Who do we have who would be better? It's between him and Kastelic, Kelly, Brassard, Watson and Gambrell... Kastelic was tried but didn't show much. And if you argue Brassard is better, well he's also on the PP anyway, so Lucchini isn't taking his spot. I guess we could potentially replace one of Luchini and Brassard with a D; but I'm not convinced Lucchini should be the one to remove.
I would’ve gone with Brannstrom and had 2D
 
  • Like
Reactions: NB613

bert

Registered User
Nov 11, 2002
37,576
23,898
Visit site
No Bert, I'm not actually complaining, I'm pointing out that not everything is perfect, and if your going to praise what's going well you need to also acknowledge what isn't. I'm using the stats to reinforce what I see on the ice, yes, we are managing the puck better in our end, but not turning over the puck in our end isn't why we struggle to score compared to earlier this year. It isn't why we score less than last year 5v5 either.

Yes. We do have a better roster than last year, go look at what we iced last season, hint, we had lots of injuries last year too.
It was the turnovers in the neutral zone specifically the oppositions blue line that was costing this team the most. Now they get it in deep, while its boring its how you win in the league. You generate less offense but give up way less on the defensive side. They were playing river boat hockey, now they've tightened up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NB613

bert

Registered User
Nov 11, 2002
37,576
23,898
Visit site
A lot of people point to firing the coach or firing the GM but cannot really articulate why. We're not getting results in the W/L column and ultimately that's what it boils down to.

I do think that when PD endorses DJ it's numbers like these that he is looking at. I also think that a top down strategic review of our entire hockey operations won't necessarily point to the need to immediately remove either Dorion or Smith. However I do get that they've been here a long time and maybe some new faces are needed. If it was my decision I wouldn't remove either of them, but I could certainly understand someone choosing to do so
I think those are pretty different things for a message board. Its pretty easy to articulate why Dorion should be fired you can look at all the roster transactions ones that worked and the ones that haven't. What they started with, where they have finished in the standings etc.

Its alot more challenging for a coach when he can only use what he is given. Considering most that post here have never played or practiced in a high level hockey system if you are going to go down the road of saying the issue is systematic. I think its easy for a fan to identify if a team has tuned a coach out. Its obvious in effort level. But the sens have for the most part always been hard working under DJ. Their puck management this year wasnt very good for a while so I wondered if they did tune him out in that regard. However its way better now. I really dont think DJ is an issue at the moment. However it helps that Zaitsev is injured and he isnt inexplicably playing him. My only real complaint is his loyalty to certain players sometimes trumps on ice performance. Other than that I am pretty happy with the job he has done with the players he has.

He has proven that he can be an effective coach with a below average team. We havent seen if he is the coach to take this team to the next level. Once/if its healthy that will be a completely different evaluation and ball game for DJ and what he is capable of. With new ownership and probably some level of management coming he has to show he can take this team to the next level and its probably this year. If he doesnt he is probably not coming back next season.
 

JD1

Registered User
Sep 12, 2005
16,342
10,019
I don’t say this as a notch against DJ, because he is responsible for his staff and they are all one organism, but the assistants deserve credit, too. I was watching the CBJ stream yesterday and they were raving about Payne running 20 set o-zone plays at ES and PP in the morning skate, saying watching that made it clear as to why our PP is so good. Obviously the players are a big part of that, too.

They also spoke about how much the players seem to adore DJ and how impressive they found DJ. I watch away streams a decent amount and this is a pretty common refrain. He is far from perfect but I think he is competent and the respect he garners from our guys is not to be overlooked.


Agreed 100%, a disproportionate # of our GAs follow an unforced error.
I watch almost exclusively the away feed. I find the perspectives offered by the opposition analysts interesting and I prefer listening to a game call that isn't one sided in our favour. I'll watch the tsn feed the odd time, never a Sportsnet feed.
 

JD1

Registered User
Sep 12, 2005
16,342
10,019
I think those are pretty different things for a message board. Its pretty easy to articulate why Dorion should be fired you can look at all the roster transactions ones that worked and the ones that haven't. What they started with, where they have finished in the standings etc.

Its alot more challenging for a coach when he can only use what he is given. Considering most that post here have never played or practiced in a high level hockey system if you are going to go down the road of saying the issue is systematic. I think its easy for a fan to identify if a team has tuned a coach out. Its obvious in effort level. But the sens have for the most part always been hard working under DJ. Their puck management this year wasnt very good for a while so I wondered if they did tune him out in that regard. However its way better now. I really dont think DJ is an issue at the moment. However it helps that Zaitsev is injured and he isnt inexplicably playing him. My only real complaint is his loyalty to certain players sometimes trumps on ice performance. Other than that I am pretty happy with the job he has done with the players he has.

He has proven that he can be an effective coach with a below average team. We havent seen if he is the coach to take this team to the next level. Once/if its healthy that will be a completely different evaluation and ball game for DJ and what he is capable of. With new ownership and probably some level of management coming he has to show he can take this team to the next level and its probably this year. If he doesnt he is probably not coming back next season.
There's a lot of retooling that goes on on the fly

There's certainly some unintended sucking going on where you have a bottom feeder that started as a team that mgmt thought cound contend

There's some sucking that's gone on for a lot of years, really bad teams that have been bad for a really long time.

We're none of those things. Our situation was torn right down, and probably in part due to money. It's being built right back up. We've got a core of guys that are locked in financially and that are emotionally invested. I credit Dorion with that.

We're actually in pretty good shape. It takes patience. Lately you've been making both of these points yourself. We'd probably be in better shape if it wasn't for unfortunate injuries delaying the development of young players. For example, Norris's injury would be less impactful if Pinto hadn't missed all last year.

You don't win every trade and you never will. And personally I like that Dorion seems to look after people. He's given some guys opportunities to pursue a career elsewhere because it was the right way to treat a person. I like that.

I agree with you on DJ.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ice-Tray

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
57,161
34,907
I think one of the biggest areas we struggle with defensively is being able to clear but not clearing. I'm totally guessing but I'd think at least 25% of the goals against happen when we had a chance to clear, didn't, that causes running around and exhausted players, the other team gets fresh legs cycled in and boom we give one up. Apart from that there's very little struggle in our end imo. And I think the root cause of this is inexperience
I think currently that's our biggest issue. I think earlier on we did very well at preventing odd man rushes, that seemed to be what the coaching staff was keying in on and I remember DJ referencing as much a frlew times, but we struggled with giveaways in our own end. We have been better of late not turning it over in our end, still have the issue with ripping it around the boards to an awaiting opponent, but it's getting better.

I think inexperience is part of it, but guys like Zaitsev, Hamonic, and Holden will tend towards off the boards and out while Brannstrom Chabot and Sanderson might try and skate there way out or pass it more often, I think for them to have success doing that relies a bit more on forwards being in the right spot than off the glass and out does.
 

Loach

Registered User
Jun 9, 2021
3,509
2,486
I think those are pretty different things for a message board. Its pretty easy to articulate why Dorion should be fired you can look at all the roster transactions ones that worked and the ones that haven't. What they started with, where they have finished in the standings etc.

Its alot more challenging for a coach when he can only use what he is given. Considering most that post here have never played or practiced in a high level hockey system if you are going to go down the road of saying the issue is systematic. I think its easy for a fan to identify if a team has tuned a coach out. Its obvious in effort level. But the sens have for the most part always been hard working under DJ. Their puck management this year wasnt very good for a while so I wondered if they did tune him out in that regard. However its way better now. I really dont think DJ is an issue at the moment. However it helps that Zaitsev is injured and he isnt inexplicably playing him. My only real complaint is his loyalty to certain players sometimes trumps on ice performance. Other than that I am pretty happy with the job he has done with the players he has.

He has proven that he can be an effective coach with a below average team. We havent seen if he is the coach to take this team to the next level. Once/if its healthy that will be a completely different evaluation and ball game for DJ and what he is capable of. With new ownership and probably some level of management coming he has to show he can take this team to the next level and its probably this year. If he doesnt he is probably not coming back next season.
Could you see new mamagement keeping DJ but letting go of Dorion?
 

swiftwin

★SUMMER.OF.STEVE★
Jul 26, 2005
24,250
13,964
Who in here wants to only praise DJ? Can you point out even one poster that has only good things to say about him?
Exactly. Nobody here does that.

For some reason people think I only praise DJ. But I actually hold a balanced view. I've criticized him plenty. All I do is call out those who regularly criticize him for ridiculous things by giving DJ credit for the same things others criticize him.
 
Last edited:

Samsquanch

Raging Bull Squatch
Nov 28, 2008
8,274
5,089
Sudbury
Exactly. Nobody here does that.

For some reason people think I only praise DJ. But I actually hold a balanced view. I've criticized him plenty. All I do is call out those who regularly criticize him for ridiculous things.

Its the same shit with Tyler Boucher. I couldnt believe what I was reading in there the other night.

"The Haters" (not my definition for them but Ill roll with it cuz they know who they are) are literally trying to say now that the only reason they've been so hyper critical of Boucher is because of all of the "fanboys" and their blind love and praise they're always giving him.

Like they actually dont want to hate him, but their hand is being forced with all of the Boucher praise constantly getting shoved down their throats by the masses of fanboys! One can only take so much rainbows and sunshine, amirite!?

When in reality, about the highest praise Boucher ever got from any poster on this board was like "well lets wait and see how he looks as a pro before we call him a bust". Or maybe complimenting his shot and physical play. Thats it.

:facepalm:
 
Last edited:

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
26,436
13,726
After 38 games last year
105 GF
129 GA
So -24 diffferntial

This year is 116 for both, so even differential
 
  • Like
Reactions: gab6511

Cosmix

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 24, 2011
19,269
7,230
Ottawa
History tells us that tends to be why coaches get fired.

I think with new ownership new faces are inevitable, but I suppose if we make a push to finish the season it might be delayed. Dorion is in a tough spot with no capspace for next year, and some longstanding holes in the backend needing addressing. If he goes I can't see DJ sticking around,
Dorion is in a tough spot by his own making given the trade retentions and buyouts he has made as GM.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bert and Loach
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad