GDT: Finland Vs Canada | 7:30PM ET | Group A - Canadian Tire Centre

TheGroceryStick

Registered User
Jan 19, 2009
13,927
3,565
Ontario Canada
Canada found seams that I’d assume the US will have covered. The PP will get ironed out, and it’s good to see a sturdy Canadian goalie back there. I’ll take a 4-0 win on Finland , all day, even if their countryman downplay their team.

That top, polished and familiar with each other USA line - will need to be ISO’d on when we meet up. Hope they have some real prickly defensive forwards to cover the load
 
  • Like
Reactions: jj cale

Slimmy

Registered User
Jan 3, 2009
4,135
845
GBG
This tournament is diminished by Russia's absence.
Buu f***ing huu you're not entertained enough because Russia has been universally banned from all big sporting events in the world. Tell that to the Ukrainians and lets see how much sympathy you get.

Agreed, Russia's absence hurts this tournament much more than, for example, WHC in May.
I'm tired of reading this. Russia has been rightfully banned from the tournament and they're not coming back. Deal with it.
 

Sideline

Registered User
May 23, 2004
11,581
3,558
Buu f***ing huu you're not entertained enough because Russia has been universally banned from all big sporting events in the world. Tell that to the Ukrainians and lets see how much sympathy you get.


I'm tired of reading this. Russia has been rightfully banned from the tournament and they're not coming back. Deal with it.
You can have whatever opinion you want on the political stuff, but it's completely reasonable to say a "best on best" tournament is diminished when one of the best teams isn't participating.
 

tade

Registered User
Mar 6, 2013
5,254
266
Brno, Czech Republic
Buu f***ing huu you're not entertained enough because Russia has been universally banned from all big sporting events in the world. Tell that to the Ukrainians and lets see how much sympathy you get.


I'm tired of reading this. Russia has been rightfully banned from the tournament and they're not coming back. Deal with it.
Don't get me wrong, I am on the same page, I agree that Russia's ban from the participation is right decision when everything is taken into consideration.

I am just saying that from the sports/entertainment perspective it hurts this event (WJC) more than some other.
 

Slimmy

Registered User
Jan 3, 2009
4,135
845
GBG
You can have whatever opinion you want on the political stuff, but it's completely reasonable to say a "best on best" tournament is diminished when one of the best teams isn't participating.
A pretty petty thing to get hung up on, all things considered, wouldn't you agree? Since whining about it won't change anything, maybe time to move on and enjoy the tournament for what it is instead of what it isn't?
 

JackSlater

Registered User
Apr 27, 2010
19,555
14,990
You can have whatever opinion you want on the political stuff, but it's completely reasonable to say a "best on best" tournament is diminished when one of the best teams isn't participating.
This is totally an aside but obviously a junior tournament can never be a best on best tournament since the best players in the world are generally not junior aged. I blame TSN, and Craig Button in particular, for starting to call basically any tournament a best on best.
 

waitin425

Registered User
Jan 10, 2009
8,476
13,155
Canada
This is totally an aside but obviously a junior tournament can never be a best on best tournament since the best players in the world are generally not junior aged. I blame TSN, and Craig Button in particular, for starting to call basically any tournament a best on best.
I was thinking this last night. Imagine thus tournament with Bedard, Fantilli, Carlsson etc. The other best 05s
 

JackSlater

Registered User
Apr 27, 2010
19,555
14,990
I was thinking this last night. Imagine thus tournament with Bedard, Fantilli, Carlsson etc. The other best 05s
Fantilli and Carlsson are too old for this tournament but that isn't what I meant. It's a junior tournament. A junior tournament can't be a best on best tournament because the age limit bans almost every one of the actual best players.
 

Nogatco Rd

Pierre-Luc Dubas
Apr 3, 2021
3,514
6,537
Buu f***ing huu you're not entertained enough because Russia has been universally banned from all big sporting events in the world. Tell that to the Ukrainians and lets see how much sympathy you get.


I'm tired of reading this. Russia has been rightfully banned from the tournament and they're not coming back. Deal with it.
honestly they should have suspended Team Canada too
 

NyQuil

Big F$&*in Q
Jan 5, 2005
99,713
66,627
Ottawa, ON
Fantilli and Carlsson are too old for this tournament but that isn't what I meant. It's a junior tournament. A junior tournament can't be a best on best tournament because the age limit bans almost every one of the actual best players.

I’ve always interpreted it as the scheduling and format of the tournament allows for all eligible players to attend within a given age group or class.

The most stringent best on best interpretation would be violated if McDavid were injured or something, which is taking it too far IMO.

Non best on best tournaments are those where the format or schedule prevents eligible players from playing, regardless of any individual decisions, health status or club team obligations.

I guess you could argue that holding the WJCs during the NHL season inherently means that it isn’t best on best.

But those tend to be a small complement of individuals as opposed to 16 NHL teams worth of players a la WCs.
 
Last edited:

wingman75

Registered User
Dec 3, 2008
6,825
7,507
The QC
This is totally an aside but obviously a junior tournament can never be a best on best tournament since the best players in the world are generally not junior aged. I blame TSN, and Craig Button in particular, for starting to call basically any tournament a best on best.
All international tournaments are age-centric best-on-best. These are the best under-20 players in the world? What is not best-on-best about that?
 

NyQuil

Big F$&*in Q
Jan 5, 2005
99,713
66,627
Ottawa, ON
All international tournaments are age-centric best-on-best. These are the best under-20 players in the world? What is not best-on-best about that?

If the NHL teams had to release all Junior aged players it would be a bit closer to that perfect ideal of best on best.

I am sure that most club teams in soccer despise the fact that their players are routinely injured playing international matches but they don’t have a choice.

I agree with you though that you can have an age specific best on best tournament if that tournament is clearly designated as a Junior tournament.

Anyway, this is just a lot of semantics around a definition that ultimately doesn’t matter all that much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Gr8 Dane

wingman75

Registered User
Dec 3, 2008
6,825
7,507
The QC
If the NHL teams had to release all Junior aged players it would be a bit closer to that perfect ideal of best on best.

I am sure that most club teams in soccer despise the fact that their players are routinely injured playing international matches but they don’t have a choice.
Sure, your point is valid. But it's the best best-on-best we can have. Regardless of which professional players are not present. Everything can be argued with a technicality. Man, glad I don't live my life like that.
 

Sideline

Registered User
May 23, 2004
11,581
3,558
A pretty petty thing to get hung up on, all things considered, wouldn't you agree? Since whining about it won't change anything, maybe time to move on and enjoy the tournament for what it is instead of what it isn't?
I mean it's not really petty in the context of this tournament. This isn't the Olympics or the men's worlds where 6 or 7 teams can win on any given night. The nature of age level national program sizes means there are only 3 legitimate contenders, 3 or 4 darkhorse candidates for a medal, and 3 or 4 teams severing as glorified Washington Generals.

I don't really enjoy watching Canada, USA, and Sweden put up touchdowns on half the teams in this tournament.
 
  • Like
Reactions: greatwhitenorth

ORRFForever

Registered User
Oct 29, 2018
20,215
11,348
I mean it's not really petty in the context of this tournament. This isn't the Olympics or the men's worlds where 6 or 7 teams can win on any given night. The nature of age level national program sizes means there are only 3 legitimate contenders, 3 or 4 darkhorse candidates for a medal, and 3 or 4 teams severing as glorified Washington Generals.

I don't really enjoy watching Canada, USA, and Sweden put up touchdowns on half the teams in this tournament.
Then don't watch.

**********************************************

This thread has gotten ugly / nasty.

Not sure why it had to go in that direction.

People at HF will argue about anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wraithsonwings

ORRFForever

Registered User
Oct 29, 2018
20,215
11,348
This is totally an aside but obviously a junior tournament can never be a best on best tournament since the best players in the world are generally not junior aged.
If you look at it from that perspective, you could never call a female tournament "best on best" because the best players are generally not women - see men.
 

Sideline

Registered User
May 23, 2004
11,581
3,558
Then don't watch.

**********************************************

This thread has gotten ugly / nasty.

Not sure why it had to go in that direction.

People at HF will argue about anything.
I'm not watching as much as I have in years past. I've watched hundreds of these games on TV and seen dozens of them live. This tournament is less fun with fewer good teams in it.

I don't see how a fan explaining why they don't enjoy something as much as they used to is ugly or nasty. Either way, Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad