It happened in the Czech game also. Currently, in this tourney, the last 4 players of the game have all been goalies.Both deserved picks as well.
This tournament is diminished by Russia's absence.Snoozefest , wish there was more than 2 countries that can compete with us out there
Agreed, Russia's absence hurts this tournament much more than, for example, WHC in May.This tournament is diminished by Russia's absence.
Buu f***ing huu you're not entertained enough because Russia has been universally banned from all big sporting events in the world. Tell that to the Ukrainians and lets see how much sympathy you get.This tournament is diminished by Russia's absence.
I'm tired of reading this. Russia has been rightfully banned from the tournament and they're not coming back. Deal with it.Agreed, Russia's absence hurts this tournament much more than, for example, WHC in May.
You can have whatever opinion you want on the political stuff, but it's completely reasonable to say a "best on best" tournament is diminished when one of the best teams isn't participating.Buu f***ing huu you're not entertained enough because Russia has been universally banned from all big sporting events in the world. Tell that to the Ukrainians and lets see how much sympathy you get.
I'm tired of reading this. Russia has been rightfully banned from the tournament and they're not coming back. Deal with it.
Don't get me wrong, I am on the same page, I agree that Russia's ban from the participation is right decision when everything is taken into consideration.Buu f***ing huu you're not entertained enough because Russia has been universally banned from all big sporting events in the world. Tell that to the Ukrainians and lets see how much sympathy you get.
I'm tired of reading this. Russia has been rightfully banned from the tournament and they're not coming back. Deal with it.
A pretty petty thing to get hung up on, all things considered, wouldn't you agree? Since whining about it won't change anything, maybe time to move on and enjoy the tournament for what it is instead of what it isn't?You can have whatever opinion you want on the political stuff, but it's completely reasonable to say a "best on best" tournament is diminished when one of the best teams isn't participating.
This is totally an aside but obviously a junior tournament can never be a best on best tournament since the best players in the world are generally not junior aged. I blame TSN, and Craig Button in particular, for starting to call basically any tournament a best on best.You can have whatever opinion you want on the political stuff, but it's completely reasonable to say a "best on best" tournament is diminished when one of the best teams isn't participating.
I was thinking this last night. Imagine thus tournament with Bedard, Fantilli, Carlsson etc. The other best 05sThis is totally an aside but obviously a junior tournament can never be a best on best tournament since the best players in the world are generally not junior aged. I blame TSN, and Craig Button in particular, for starting to call basically any tournament a best on best.
Fantilli and Carlsson are too old for this tournament but that isn't what I meant. It's a junior tournament. A junior tournament can't be a best on best tournament because the age limit bans almost every one of the actual best players.I was thinking this last night. Imagine thus tournament with Bedard, Fantilli, Carlsson etc. The other best 05s
honestly they should have suspended Team Canada tooBuu f***ing huu you're not entertained enough because Russia has been universally banned from all big sporting events in the world. Tell that to the Ukrainians and lets see how much sympathy you get.
I'm tired of reading this. Russia has been rightfully banned from the tournament and they're not coming back. Deal with it.
Fantilli and Carlsson are too old for this tournament but that isn't what I meant. It's a junior tournament. A junior tournament can't be a best on best tournament because the age limit bans almost every one of the actual best players.
All international tournaments are age-centric best-on-best. These are the best under-20 players in the world? What is not best-on-best about that?This is totally an aside but obviously a junior tournament can never be a best on best tournament since the best players in the world are generally not junior aged. I blame TSN, and Craig Button in particular, for starting to call basically any tournament a best on best.
All international tournaments are age-centric best-on-best. These are the best under-20 players in the world? What is not best-on-best about that?
Sure, your point is valid. But it's the best best-on-best we can have. Regardless of which professional players are not present. Everything can be argued with a technicality. Man, glad I don't live my life like that.If the NHL teams had to release all Junior aged players it would be a bit closer to that perfect ideal of best on best.
I am sure that most club teams in soccer despise the fact that their players are routinely injured playing international matches but they don’t have a choice.
The US giving up 4 goals to Germany made you more confident in them?After watching the first day of tournament, I’m confident usa gunna big brother Canada
I mean it's not really petty in the context of this tournament. This isn't the Olympics or the men's worlds where 6 or 7 teams can win on any given night. The nature of age level national program sizes means there are only 3 legitimate contenders, 3 or 4 darkhorse candidates for a medal, and 3 or 4 teams severing as glorified Washington Generals.A pretty petty thing to get hung up on, all things considered, wouldn't you agree? Since whining about it won't change anything, maybe time to move on and enjoy the tournament for what it is instead of what it isn't?
Then don't watch.I mean it's not really petty in the context of this tournament. This isn't the Olympics or the men's worlds where 6 or 7 teams can win on any given night. The nature of age level national program sizes means there are only 3 legitimate contenders, 3 or 4 darkhorse candidates for a medal, and 3 or 4 teams severing as glorified Washington Generals.
I don't really enjoy watching Canada, USA, and Sweden put up touchdowns on half the teams in this tournament.
That's the internet world now, brother.People at HF will argue about anything.
If you look at it from that perspective, you could never call a female tournament "best on best" because the best players are generally not women - see men.This is totally an aside but obviously a junior tournament can never be a best on best tournament since the best players in the world are generally not junior aged.
I'm not watching as much as I have in years past. I've watched hundreds of these games on TV and seen dozens of them live. This tournament is less fun with fewer good teams in it.Then don't watch.
**********************************************
This thread has gotten ugly / nasty.
Not sure why it had to go in that direction.
People at HF will argue about anything.
I'll take your word for it. It's still a shame but, then again, I am guilty of it myself so...That's the internet world now, brother.
This place is still 100x better than Twitter, Facebook or any other social media.