Prospect Info: Filip Mesar

[JIMVINNY]

So, at best, after 3 years Nicholas has accomplished nothing? How’s that any better. He can’t get Mešar, Dach, or Slaf to improve their game. Those are our three earliest acquired ‘future core’ talents.

It doesn’t bode well at all.

Getting too much pushback in the Slaf thread, so you had to bring your Slaf hate over to this one, huh? With how he's played over the past couple games, I'd think you stay hidden under your bridge until he has at least a few bad games...

That all being said, with how the rest of our young players have demonstrated improvement, if you're going to blame the struggles of a few on Nicholas, you then have to give him the credit for all the good results. or MAYBE, we could acknowledge that a coach can't force a player to improve, and that the players bear most of the responsibility for their results.

 

[LaP]

So, at best, after 3 years Nicholas has accomplished nothing? How’s that any better. He can’t get Mešar, Dach, or Slaf to improve their game. Those are our three earliest acquired ‘future core’ talents.

It doesn’t bode well at all.

Dunno

Hutson is pretty good. I think you assessment of Slaf is skewed at best. Guhle has shown sign of slow but steady progression. Suzuki and Caufield are looking good. Heineman if doing well. Pretty much everyone in the AHL is doing good outsife of Mesar. Not all prospects will pan out you do realize that yes?

 

[TomKosto]

Getting too much pushback in the Slaf thread, so you had to bring your Slaf hate over to this one, huh? With how he's played over the past couple games, I'd think you stay hidden under your bridge until he has at least a few bad games...

That all being said, with how the rest of our young players have demonstrated improvement, if you're going to blame the struggles of a few on Nicholas, you then have to give him the credit for all the good results. or MAYBE, we could acknowledge that a coach can't force a player to improve, and that the players bear most of the responsibility for their results.

That dude can’t explain how it’s his faults if an injured Dach didnt developp his skillsets. Just a hater is my guess.

 

[ReHabs]

Maybe Nicholas should put injured players on NHL25 to developp their skillsets, interesting perspective!!

Can you elaborate on how he sould have develop an injured Dach, really curious to read your reasoning

Mesar, Dach, and Slaf have been injured the entirety of the last three years -- is that right?

Getting too much pushback in the Slaf thread, so you had to bring your Slaf hate over to this one, huh? With how he's played over the past couple games, I'd think you stay hidden under your bridge until he has at least a few bad games...

That all being said, with how the rest of our young players have demonstrated improvement, if you're going to blame the struggles of a few on Nicholas, you then have to give him the credit for all the good results. or MAYBE, we could acknowledge that a coach can't force a player to improve, and that the players bear most of the responsibility for their results.

You need to simmer down with the "stay hidden under your bridge" stuff. It's not interesting, it's just rude and unnecessary.

Can you name the young players who have demonstrated improvement?

 

[ReHabs]

Dunno

Hutson is pretty good. I think you assessment of Slaf is skewed at best. Guhle has shown sign of slow but steady progression. Suzuki and Caufield are looking good. Heineman if doing well. Pretty much everyone in the AHL is doing good outsife of Mesar. Not all prospects will pan out you do realize that yes?

It's ridiculous to credit Nicholas with the progress of players he inherited (and were on good tracks before his hiring) and absolve him of the players he's actually managed from their start in the NHL.

 

[Andrei79]

Dunno

Hutson is pretty good. I think you assessment of Slaf is skewed at best. Guhle has shown sign of slow but steady progression. Suzuki and Caufield are looking good. Heineman if doing well. Pretty much everyone in the AHL is doing good outsife of Mesar. Not all prospects will pan out you do realize that yes?

Yeah, but those don't count because they're good players who are getting better. The only ones that count are those that don't improve. Also, even if Slaf keeps improving, it doesn't matter because I invested so much in hating him that I can't go back.

 

[LaP]

Yeah, but those don't count because they're good players who are getting better. The only ones that count are those that don't improve. Also, even if Slaf keeps improving, it doesn't matter because I invested so much in hating him that I can't go back.

I know you're joking but just for the sake even if you go with the narrative those were always good i'd say Caufield was looking pretty bad when the new management came in. He was looking like a salvation army's Jerff Skinner when the old management was fired.

 

[thebestnic]

I know you're joking but just for the sake even if you go with the narrative those were always good i'd say Caufield was looking pretty bad when the new management came in. He was looking like a salvation army's Jerff Skinner when the old management was fired.

Caufield doesn't get enough credit for how much his game improved in the last two years, especially defensively. It's night and day

 

[Favster]

There’s alot of highlights of him, maybe watch a few. Saying he doesnt have NHL skills is ignorant.

You're the last guy on here who should be saying what's ignorant and what's not. Using highlight packages might be a part of your problem.

 

[ReHabs]

Yeah, but those don't count because they're good players who are getting better. The only ones that count are those that don't improve. Also, even if Slaf keeps improving, it doesn't matter because I invested so much in hating him that I can't go back.

Can we name players who started in the NHL AFTER Nicholas' hiring and have demonstrated a clear upward trajectory?

If only Slaf "keeps improving"... if only.

I know you're joking but just for the sake even if you go with the narrative those were always good i'd say Caufield was looking pretty bad when the new management came in. He was looking like a salvation army's Jerff Skinner when the old management was fired.

We all knew Caufield was better than he looked. That's the point. Try to look at things as they are, not as they appear.

 

[JIMVINNY]

Mesar, Dach, and Slaf have been injured the entirety of the last three years -- is that right?


You need to simmer down with the "stay hidden under your bridge" stuff. It's not interesting, it's just rude and unnecessary.

Can you name the young players who have demonstrated improvement?

Simmer down with what? That is the first time I've ever made a troll joke in reference to you, so if you're feeling like you're hearing that a lot, perhaps you should ask yourself why people have that perception. Interesting or not, rude or not, if the shoe fits....

You named 3 players that haven't improved, and you included Slaf on that list. I think the vast majority of habs fans would disagree with you on that one, but whatever. I would maybe add Newhook to your list, but either way, I'm satisfied with the progression demonstrated by a lot of the young players in the organization. The young players on the NHL team are showing progression, and the AHL team is playing very well.

Assessing the performance of a Director of Player Development is no easy task. But you seem to blaming him and him alone for the lack of development displayed by Mesar and Dach. Dach has already had one team give up on him, and Mesar is just a weird dude. Conversely, I would argue that Nicholas has done an exceptional job with Hutson, Heineman, Beck, and both Xhekaj brothers.

 

[ReHabs]

Simmer down with what? That is the first time I've ever made a troll joke in reference to you, so if you're feeling like you're hearing that a lot, perhaps you should ask yourself why people have that perception. Interesting or not, rude or not, if the shoe fits....

"rude or not" You can choose to not be rude, it isn't hard to make the right decision.

You named 3 players that haven't improved, and you included Slaf on that list. I think the vast majority of habs fans would disagree with you on that one, but whatever. I would maybe add Newhook to your list, but either way, I'm satisfied with the progression demonstrated by a lot of the young players in the organization. The young players on the NHL team are showing progression, and the AHL team is playing very well.

A vast majority of Habs fans thought Bergevin deserved a contract extension in September of 2021. A vast majority of Habs fans do not pay attention.

Assessing the performance of a Director of Player Development is no easy task. But you seem to blaming him and him alone for the lack of development displayed by Mesar and Dach. Dach has already had one team give up on him, and Mesar is just a weird dude. Conversely, I would argue that Nicholas has done an exceptional job with Hutson, Heineman, Beck, and both Xhekaj brothers.

Hutson is a rookie
Heineman is a rookie
Beck is a rookie
Xhekaj has plateaued
Florian isn't even in the NHL

crikey that's a miserable list. EXCEPTIONAL??

 

[TomKosto]

Mesar, Dach, and Slaf have been injured the entirety of the last three years -- is that right?


You need to simmer down with the "stay hidden under your bridge" stuff. It's not interesting, it's just rude and unnecessary.

Can you name the young players who have demonstrated improvement?

Calling people rude when you are saying I’m Nicholas burner account because I don’t agree with you, double standard I guess..

It’s pretty clear that you can’t fullty developp an injured player. Yea he played some games here and there, but you can’t say it didn’t play a important role. Injuries plays a lot in the development of youngters, whatever the sport is.

I agree with Mesar, but there’s a lot of red flags with the dude.

Slaf to me have shown development, just need to play his style more, he’s never going to be a Patrick Kane, was not drafted to be (words of our GM)

Is there any organisation hitting the jackpot on all youngster with the development?
I get it, it coulb be better in some case, but to say it’s the fault of one guy is silly, when you considered all the facts.

 

[ReHabs]

Calling people rude when you are saying I’m Nicholas burner account because I don’t agree with you, double standard I guess..

Do you really think the tone and implication is the same thing between the two statements?

It’s pretty clear that you can’t fullty developp an injured player. Yea he played some games here and there, but you can’t say it didn’t play a important role. Injuries plays a lot in the development of youngters, whatever the sport is.

I agree with Mesar, but there’s a lot of red flags with the dude.

Slaf to me have shown development, just need to play his style more, he’s never going to be a Patrick Kane, was not drafted to be (words of our GM)

Is there any organisation hitting the jackpot on all youngster with the development?
I get it, it coulb be better in some case, but to say it’s the fault of one guy is silly, when you considered all the facts.

I'm honestly and seriously asking which players has Nicholas developed because Mesar was a great opportunity: a high-skill player with wheels. He needed to learn to play NHL-style hockey. It's the stuff video coaching and development coaching should help resolve.. It didn't happen.

We can bicker about Slaf and Dach but it's boring at this point. I think Slaf's developed in the NHL but it's not been a big success and Slaf's references to different players over the years and his frustration with own game indicates a lot of confusion in his development. But that's a separate discussion.

So which players or prospects can we actually see an uptick in their development? Let's include AHL and NHL both.

 

[TomKosto]

Do you really think the tone and implication is the same thing between the two statements?

I'm honestly and seriously asking which players has Nicholas developed because Mesar was a great opportunity: a high-skill player with wheels. He needed to learn to play NHL-style hockey. It's the stuff video coaching and development coaching should help resolve.. It didn't happen.

We can bicker about Slaf and Dach but it's boring at this point. I think Slaf's developed in the NHL but it's not been a big success and Slaf's references to different players over the years and his frustration with own game indicates a lot of confusion in his development. But that's a separate discussion.

So which players or prospects can we actually see an uptick in their development? Let's include AHL and NHL both.

Hutson, Beck, Heineman, Xhekaj brothers (not saying they are stars), Mailloux (up and downs but he is progressing).

Anyway like you said it’s getting boring, have a great day my friend.

 

[JIMVINNY]

Do you really think the tone and implication is the same thing between the two statements?

You outright accused someone of being a shill account. That is definitely trolling. Whining every time someone calls you out on your behavior is starting to become a pattern with you, and it's really tiresome. If you want to be abrasive, which you clearly do, deal with the consequences.

 

[WeThreeKings]

You outright accused someone of being a shill account. That is definitely trolling. Whining every time someone calls you out on your behavior is starting to become a pattern with you, and it's really tiresome. If you want to be abrasive, which you clearly do, deal with the consequences.

He's a bitch.

 

[ReHabs]

You outright accused someone of being a shill account. That is definitely trolling. Whining every time someone calls you out on your behavior is starting to become a pattern with you, and it's really tiresome. If you want to be abrasive, which you clearly do, deal with the consequences.

I think some of you people have a tough time arguing ideas and quickly get frustrated and resort to insults. For instance, "are you XXX's burner" is a pretty common refrain in sports commentary spaces, like when someone says they want to give Gallagher a new extension, you expect someone to reply "are you Bergevin's burner??" it's a light-hearted comment comment in response to their argument; it's not a comment against that person. See, that's the difference. If you didn't know that and think my comment was trolling I hope you now see my perspective. You don't need to say I live under a bridge, you can just disagree (or even insult) my arguments. It's perfectly fine.

He's a bitch.

I know better than to say things online that I wouldn't say IRL. It keeps me honest. You have enough people who hate you here, you should try it sometime.

Hutson, Beck, Heineman, Xhekaj brothers (not saying they are stars), Mailloux (up and downs but he is progressing).

Anyway like you said it’s getting boring, have a great day my friend.

Hutson is a real fresh rookie we can't point to any trajectory that was affected by Nicholas just yet. Arber Xhekaj is not progressing, I would argue neither has Struble who was awful at times this season (and Barron who was cut loose). Beck, Florian, and Mailloux have not established themselves in the NHL.

23 year old rookie Heineman, sure why not.

 

[JIMVINNY]

I think some of you people have a tough time . For instance, "are you XXX's burner" is a pretty common refrain in sports commentary spaces, like when someone says they want to give Gallagher a new extension, you expect someone to reply "are you Bergevin's burner??" it's a light-hearted comment comment in response to their argument; it's not a comment against that person. See, that's the difference. If you didn't know that and think my comment was trolling I hope you now see my perspective. You don't need to say I live under a bridge, you can just disagree (or even insult) my arguments. It's perfectly fine.

That is some Olympic Gold-level mental gymnastics, but I honestly don't care anymore. You whine when you get called out on your bad takes, you whine when you get called out on your trolling, and it's always someone else's fault. Grow up.

 

[ReHabs]

That is some Olympic Gold-level mental gymnastics, but I honestly don't care anymore. You whine when you get called out on your bad takes, you whine when you get called out on your trolling, and it's always someone else's fault. Grow up.

Asking you to not make personal attacks and rude comments is not a whine — it’s a direct request from me. Feel free to remain tilted, it doesn’t change anything.

 

[Guy Larose]

That is some Olympic Gold-level mental gymnastics, but I honestly don't care anymore. You whine when you get called out on your bad takes, you whine when you get called out on your trolling, and it's always someone else's fault. Grow up.

 

[JIMVINNY]

Asking you to not make personal attacks and rude comments is not a whine — it’s a direct request from me. Feel free to remain tilted, it doesn’t change anything.

Gently implying you're a troll is not a personal attack, it's a direct consequence of your behavior. If you don't like the consequences, adjust your behaviour. Personally, I don't care either way. As for being "tilted," I have three teenage children. You're dreaming if you think you can cause me one tenth the angst they do. This is fun for me.

 

[sampollock]

ANYWAY how about that filip kid??? lol

 

[overlords]

ANYWAY how about that filip kid??? lol

4 points in his first OHL game

 

[EtLeBut2]

I think some of you people have a tough time arguing ideas and quickly get frustrated and resort to insults. For instance, "are you XXX's burner" is a pretty common refrain in sports commentary spaces, like when someone says they want to give Gallagher a new extension, you expect someone to reply "are you Bergevin's burner??" it's a light-hearted comment comment in response to their argument; it's not a comment against that person. See, that's the difference. If you didn't know that and think my comment was trolling I hope you now see my perspective. You don't need to say I live under a bridge, you can just disagree (or even insult) my arguments. It's perfectly fine.


I know better than to say things online that I wouldn't say IRL. It keeps me honest. You have enough people who hate you here, you should try it sometime.


Hutson is a real fresh rookie we can't point to any trajectory that was affected by Nicholas just yet. Arber Xhekaj is not progressing, I would argue neither has Struble who was awful at times this season (and Barron who was cut loose). Beck, Florian, and Mailloux have not established themselves in the NHL.

23 year old rookie Heineman, sure why not.

Giving Nicholas credit for Hutson is a huge stretch considering Hutson is a true rookie continuing his career trajectory.

Xhekaj has if anything regressed this year and Mailloux is a first round draft pick who at this point still is too much of a defensive liability for the NHL - not sure these are the success stories you want to look at.