You are 100% correct.
But that word allow is the most important word.
You as a fan should have zero expectation of information aside from what the team and player allow you to have.
demands or expectations of information is just wrong.
Player Discussion Filip Chytil: Part III
- Thread starter Leonardo87
- Start date
But that word allow is the most important word.
You as a fan should have zero expectation of information aside from what the team and player allow you to have.
demands or expectations of information is just wrong.
SA16
Sixstring
Sure, but I was responding to a comment about the "right to health privacy" which is something players give away when they agree to join the league.
again they give it up to one specific group. Not to the general public.
Atax
Registered User
- Apr 7, 2011
- 5,285
- 6,332
I posted the CBA for him and I guess he didn't read it. It basically says the team can say that they're injured, can/cant travel with the team, and I think if they had surgery? It explicitly states they can only release more info with the permission of the player. He's just wrong. I could be misreading it.
I posted the CBA which doesnt match up with what your stating. Again, I might be misreading it. I'm no legal scholar.
Last edited:
The Crypto Guy
Registered User
- Jun 26, 2017
- 28,290
- 36,859
SA16
Sixstring
Your post said exactly what I am saying. The last paragraph is specifically about "public relations purposes" and basically states the club can say whatever they want for injuries that occur on company time.
"The nature of a players injury...the prognosis and anticipated length of recovery...treatment and surgical procedures..."
It then states for issues that are not hockey/organization related (i.e. someone coming down with a serious illness) all they have to say is the player has a health issue and will not play for some period of time but they do not need to give more details.
Sure they do, lol, I'd say read the CBA but I'm sure you won't. Not to worry Atax already posted it.
Last edited:
- Apr 16, 2012
- 4,742
- 5,908
I like to think I wouldn’t have, but maybe Fil was insisting he was fine at first. Sometimes with adrenalin you dont feel the pain right away.
Atax
Registered User
- Apr 7, 2011
- 5,285
- 6,332
Yeah I see what you're saying. I think my brain got a big confused by the previous entry. (Only certain info with consent of player). Maybe that meant something outside of the intended uses. Work in healthcare so its been hardwired to think a certain way with it. Thanks for pointing it out.
SA16
Sixstring
It is pretty much just anything that occurred on the ice or in a team facility can be reported publicly with as much detail as desired.
Something outside of that (such as Mike Reilly's recent heart condition) can not be reported with any detail without consent of the player.
Got his bell rung. Have to be safe with his history. It’s not rocket science fellas….. he had to make an appt with a specialist like anyone else.
Seems like common sense…..
GREAT NEWS!!!
Seems like common sense…..
GREAT NEWS!!!
94leetch
Registered User
- Oct 29, 2022
- 244
- 303
The HFDocs take their 10000000000000th L.
Don’t blame them this time though, that one looked bad. This wasn’t an instance of someone blocking a shot with their foot and everyone speculating on a season ending shoulder injury only for the player to not miss a shift.
tlk
hARry kane comeS homE
Takeahnase
Registered User
will1066
Registered User
- Oct 12, 2008
- 48,213
- 67,358
I think at the end of the day the important thing is that they're together now.
sounds like a you problem?
I'm sure I'm not the only one. Considering fans are paying customers and this is shitty customer service I see no problem in the complaint.
If you want to play the game of nothing outside of the actual game is any of your business why do we need to know players' contract details?
- Apr 16, 2012
- 4,742
- 5,908
Fans can WANT anything they like. But we are NOT entitled to player's medical details. Sure gamblers REALLY want to know, so what?
Can't speak for anyone else, but I don't give a shit about the details. I respect the players' privacy on medical matters. Even if the team is ALLOWED to publicize, without the player consent, (which I don't read as being the case) I'd prefer they defer to the player.
Can't speak for anyone else, but I don't give a shit about the details. I respect the players' privacy on medical matters. Even if the team is ALLOWED to publicize, without the player consent, (which I don't read as being the case) I'd prefer they defer to the player.
Why do we know anything about public figures? If you don't want private info publicized I suggest you go be an office worker. But not a successful one that might become CEO because then we'll learn about your infidelities and whatnot.
See above emphasis, they aren't your players, full stop.
Were you going to cook some chicken soup for Filip? If an injury to a player was 'unbearable' to you, that's something you should probably work on.
For all the actual stamping of feet you do in your real life, I really hope you don't live above anyone.
Considering the team wouldn't exist without fans, dismissing fans as a non-entity is ridiculous.
- Apr 16, 2012
- 4,742
- 5,908
Not all information is protected the same way... This doesn't change at all my feelings on the situation. As I expect my post did not change yours. Hahahaha. Just giving my take, not saying anyone has to agree.
Well considering in other sports we learn this info then it's probably not protected by law.
