GDT: Feb. 19, 2006 | Canada vs. Finland | 3 PM ET | 9 PM CET

Status
Not open for further replies.
A serious case of deja vu. Start was worse, but the end result was the same: Canada didn't playing with desperation or hustle until it was 2-0. The quick-skating Finns surrendered only one breakaway to Nash, and no odd-man rushes that I can remember. Textbook defensive effort. The physical play from the Finns shouldn't be a surprise, they've been working to produce more physical, North American style players for the past decade, while not losing their speed.

There doesn't seem to be a lot of precision or execution on Canada's part. They aren't getting the shots through from the point, and when they do, they aren't generating/converting on the rebounds. The passing isn't crisp. They aren't showing desperation until it's too late. When the forwards get in tight, they're either missing the net or shooting it into the goalie. You can call for roster changes all you want, but the addition of Staal and Boyle doesn't make one iota of a difference. This is a team-wide problem. Guys like Nash, Thornton, Lecavalier, Richards and Heatley need to start producing.

Tomorrow is a very big day for Canada. They don't play, but an excellent practice is a must. It's time for the coaches to show why they belong in this tournament. With the Czech game Tuesday and the quarter-final Wednesday, it will likely be their last chance for a strong practice before the elimination round starts.

Canada can still finish second with a win over the Czechs and an Italian win over the Swiss. Unlikely, but nobody thought the Swiss would beat Canada and the Czechs.

This isn't the time for panic, yet. This team was .500 after the round-robin in 2002, too, and we remember how that ended. If they're down 2-0 early in second period of the quarter-final, and they still aren't generating chances, that's when it's time to panic.
 
Cyclops II said:
Lehtonen IS injured and a far better goalie than Nittymaki. I am sure he will be the #1 in 2010. Kiprusoff is not hurt. He should not even be allowed to return to Finland.

I wouldn't say Lehtonen is so much better(if at all) atm. Just have more potential.
 
Cyclops II said:
Lehtonen IS injured and a far better goalie than Nittymaki. I am sure he will be the #1 in 2010. Kiprusoff is not hurt. He should not even be allowed to return to Finland.

Nitty dominated Lehtonen in last year's Calder Cup finals.
 
Gags1288 said:
Just think how good Finland would be with Kapanen, Pitkanen, and Ruutu.

Who knows? Maybe they aren't as good a TEAM when you take out the 3 guys playing in those spots.

You Canadians are too easily blinded by star power. Its not about how many big names you have, its about playing as a team. Apparently, you have forgotten the lessons of Nagano and Salt Lake City.
 
I can't believe some think this was a great game.
This was a boring game like 99% of the olympic games so far.
This is defensive hockey at its worst.

How many scoring chances there were in this game ? I mean really good chances ?

Finland: Maybe about 5-6
Canada: Maybe 2
 
Frank was good, but he didn't have to dominate like Gerber did yesterday. The shot total was less than half of Gerber's workload, wasn't it? Still, he made some excellent saves.

I don't even have any suggestions or criticisms anymore for Team Canada. The list is too long.
 
Finland rules. I hope that every swedish coach in the nation got this game on tape and can show it to their players, because this is the kind of hockey we should play.

Well done, Suomi!! :handclap: :handclap:
 
#37 said:
Who knows? Maybe they aren't as good a TEAM when you take out the 3 guys playing in those spots.

You Canadians are too easily blinded by star power. Its not about how many big names you have, its about playing as a team. Apparently, you have forgotten the lessons of Nagano.

So you're telling me you don't want Pitkanen on the team? That's insane. The other two I understand, but Pitkanen is one of the best defensemen in the world, nevermind Finland.
 
#37 said:
Who knows? Maybe they aren't as good a TEAM when you take out the 3 guys playing in those spots.

You Canadians are too easily blinded by star power. Its not about how many big names you have, its about playing as a team. Apparently, you have forgotten the lessons of Nagano.

Well one good D as taking Berg's place wouldn't harm team.
 
trippyime said:
So you're telling me you don't want Pitkanen on the team? That's insane. The other two I understand, but Pitkanen is one of the best defensemen in the world, nevermind Finland.

Didn't look like they needed him today...
 
Battousai said:
Niitty... holy crap. That was some amazing Frank pwnage.

And Matti_A, terrible rebounds my fanny. Pads aren't made of glue you know.
I know you can't prevent every rebound but he's given up more than usual this tournament.

97.7 save% or not I'm still not impressed by Niitty so far. I'll be happy when he plays like he did against Calgary in the 1-0 shootout win if you remember.
Today he was incredibly lucky to earn the shutout. I would still take Kipper and maybe Lehtonen over Niitty.
This is just the way I see it.
 
What a great game! Our secret weapon, mobile defence squad looked really good. Hopefully our team keeps building on this... not losing their momentum in an 'easy' game versus Germany.

Niittymäki > Kiprusoff :yo:
 
Vikke said:
Nitty dominated Lehtonen in last year's Calder Cup finals.

Despite the end results, I wouldn't say he dominated him. Definitely outplayed though. They both had spectacular playoffs.

I don't think it is too hard to consider Niittymaki the better goalie today.. I definitely don't think Kari is miles ahead of him, that's for sure. Lehtonen generally looks a lot safer in net, but Niittymaki gets the job done.

I do think Lehtonen is the better goalie myself, but it is almost impossible to think he would be doing any better than Niittymaki right now. Niittymaki has definitely shown the ability to stand up in big games, that's for sure.
 
hifk88 said:
Finland was clearly a better team than Canada and that is a fact....
Please. no excusis Canadians.... ;)

Unfortunately for Finland it doesn't mean much. Pretty much all the teams except Italy and Germany could shutout this team.
 
#37 said:
Didn't look like they needed him today...

No, but that's a really stupid way of looking at it.

You're telling me having the best defensemen in the country, one of the tops in the world, on the team would effect team chemistry and Finland would be losing? If anything, they'd be winning by more goals.
 
hifk88 said:
Finland was clearly a better team than Canada and that is a fact....
Please. no excusis Canadians.... ;)

1st period definitely, but I think Canada played a little better than Finland in the 2nd and 3rd but then they got burned by the trap that the Finns started playing.
 
Andrew_11 said:
I think the big key for Canada is getting the first goal of the game from now on. After the Finns and Swiss got the first goal they played an extremely effective traplike strategy that really puzzled Canada. Nonetheless, Finland played a good smart game today and probably deserved to win although I'd say Canada outplayed them especially in the final two periods.
We didn't see the same game. Canada was awful and never outplayed Finland. We didn't skate, couldn't pass, couldn't do anything good.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad