Svechhammer
THIS is hockey?
- Jun 8, 2017
- 25,391
- 92,623
We have a tremendous amount of space because we let all our free agents go……..The brilliance isn't the trade it's that we had the space to be able to pull it off. We have done such a tremendous job managing the cap, yes there have been casualties, but we were the only team in a position right now to take advantage of Vegas' situation and get a top goal scorer on a reasonable contract for free. Along with another asset at that...
Patches utilized his limited NTC to take the other likely suitors out of the running (i.e. teams with cap space), Vegas wasn't going to trade him to a rival and the other teams that may have wanted him don't have the cap space. So there we were ready to swoop in and improve our team significantly at no cost and without hurting our cap structure at all going forward either.
Nino went out at $5.25M. Pacioretty came in at $7M. Nino will almost certainly sign at <$7M. That's not cheaper.We have a tremendous amount of space because we let all our free agents go……..
That’s not genius, that’s just letting everyone leave and finding cheaper replacements.
We have a tremendous amount of space because we let all our free agents go……..
That’s not genius, that’s just letting everyone leave and finding cheaper replacements.
I saw the talk about whether we're a better team now than before, and I just want to get my two cents in and say that doesn't matter. Last year's team could have legitimately won the Cup with the roster it had, but the playoff performances of some of our star players left a lot to be desired, especially when compared with the performances of star players around the league.
Likewise, the roster we're creating now could legitimately win the Cup, but if the playoffs come around and Svech struggles to find his game again, the difference between having Tro instead of KK or TDA instead of Burns or Nino instead of MaxPac doesn't really matter.
And I think it'll be this way for a while. We've already got a core group we like and that we're dedicated to, and we'll spend off-seasons and deadlines adjusting the players around that core group, but ultimately it comes down to that core group stepping up their game and carrying the team on their back when the playoffs start.
Not really. The guys we've let walk are non-core guys who we got for pretty much nothing, got value from for several years and are now avoiding overpaying for long, stupid term. Other teams don't do that which is why they're in terrible cap situations. We're not letting any of our core pieces leave. Our only remotely bad contract is Gardiner and it's not even that bad and only is bad as a result of injuries.We have a tremendous amount of space because we let all our free agents go……..
That’s not genius, that’s just letting everyone leave and finding cheaper replacements.
I don’t disagree I just think it’s standard off season maneuvering vs insightful genius. We have faith we’re going to replace guys. It’s not always about the AAV it’s about term as well obviously when you see when look at Trocheck’s term.Well, to be fair, in terms of cap space, Burns was actually more expensive than DeAngelo's new contract was. Same with Freddie Andersen over Nedeljkovic. Pacioretty's going to be more expensive than Nino, too. The one spot where there's going to be savings is Kotkaniemi over Trocheck. Sometimes it's actually about a legitimate roster upgrade.
Yes, I want us to make one more move this offseason (ideally dumping Gardiner's contract to make room for whoever), but another big move might not happen until the TDL (probably would be my guess). While I want them to make another big move this offseason, this wouldn't be a bad roster to go into the season with either IMO; they still need to figure out the 3rd D pairing though.I still think an outside chance that Gardiner will get moved to make room for the TDL. I think looking around, if we are pacing for 1st in Metro, Patrick Kane would waive to come here.
After the rookie year Jarvis had, I don't see them putting him on the 4th line. At least, not unless he bombs on a Necas level, but I doubt that happens either.So looking at the current roster:
Turbo - Aho - Necas
Patches - KK - Svech
Kase - Staal - Fast
Marty - Drury - Jarvis
That 4th line would be sneaky.
I don’t disagree I just think it’s standard off season maneuvering vs insightful genius. We have faith we’re going to replace guys. It’s not always about the AAV it’s about term as well obviously when you see when look at Trocheck’s term.
We took a huge chance on Koko. Rod has said it, he’s the Trocheck replacement. That was financially motivated no? Sign a guy for less and hope he exceeds what he’s been. For eight years. I agree that taking those chances are better than taking other chances but it’s all a roll of the dice and we’re trying to do things other teams don’t that lead to us to getting new players because we can’t or won’t compete the more standard ways. It’s good, it takes guts….but we make it out that we’re seeing things other teams are incapable of seeing.
That's an interesting idea for a lineup. After Rod's latest comments about Koko stepping up though, I think at least to begin with, he's gonna be the 2c. If he's not that good after a while in that role, then I wouldn't rule out them flipping Koko and Staal.Staal doesn't have to be pigeonholed into a grinding, heavy forecheck line. If the goal is to compete for the Jennings Trophy, yes. However, I see a team that is built differently this year: more finesse, less jam. Fast is not a guaranteed Top 9 F on team like that. A possible combination:
Pacioretty - Aho - Necas
Svechnikov - Staal - Teravainen
Jarvis - Kotkaniemi - Kase
Martinook - Drury - Fast
If you take Pederson and Coughlin out, you've got about $5.5 million in cap. Then you'd have to add Drury back in which puts us somewhere around $4.6 million. We'd be at 11 forwards, 6 defensemen, and 2 goalies. So in theory, enough money for a Necas "show me" 1 year deal plus an extra forward and extra defender.Per CapFriendly, our current Cap Space is $4.08m, and that's without Necas or Bear.
Unless we get Nino coming in on a discount, I don't see how we can fit him in.
Kotkaniemi's cap his is $70,000 higher than Trocheck was.Well, to be fair, in terms of cap space, Burns was actually more expensive than DeAngelo's new contract was. Same with Freddie Andersen over Nedeljkovic. Pacioretty's going to be more expensive than Nino, too. The one spot where there's going to be savings is Kotkaniemi over Trocheck. Sometimes it's actually about a legitimate roster upgrade.
Staal is too slow and too much of an offensive black hole 90% of the time for me to be comfortable with him anchoring our talented top 6 wingers like Svech and Turbo. I wouldn't hate it, but think we have better options.Staal doesn't have to be pigeonholed into a grinding, heavy forecheck line. If the goal is to compete for the Jennings Trophy, yes. However, I see a team that is built differently this year: more finesse, less jam. Fast is not a guaranteed Top 9 F on team like that. A possible combination:
Pacioretty - Aho - Necas
Svechnikov - Staal - Teravainen
Jarvis - Kotkaniemi - Kase
Martinook - Drury - Fast
Kotkaniemi's cap his is $70,000 higher than Trocheck was.
Yeah, agreed. It won't happen because I don't see Rod demoting Staal to the 4th line, and even more so for a young player trying to break into the league with his rookie season. Drury would have to blow people away so much for this to be even considered by Rod.Prob won’t happen, but IF they REALLY trust Drury and they DO decide to pidgeon-hole Staal into a checking role:
Svechnikov-Aho-Jarvis
Pacioretty-Kotkaniemi-Necas
Teravainen-Drury-Kase
Martinook-Staal-Fast
Bear has to go. I've gone from hopeful, to neutral, to straight up dislike of the guy, Just trade him.Per CapFriendly, our current Cap Space is $4.08m, and that's without Necas or Bear.
Unless we get Nino coming in on a discount, I don't see how we can fit him in.