Captain97
Registered User
Slafkovsky-Suzuki-Caufield would be awesome !
Agreed perfect compliment to that line, has the skill to play with those two but also makes up for Caufield being small (I understand Suzuki is shorter but he isn't small)
Slafkovsky-Suzuki-Caufield would be awesome !
Slafkovsky-Suzuki-Caufield would be awesome !
Few things.Was curious and looked it up, his PPG puts him around 10th or 11th place. Behind the likes of Granlund, Kakko, Barkov, Puljujarvi, Laine, Lehkonen and so on. So I am not entirely sure what to make of it.
View attachment 533385
Few things.
First: How do we factor in team tactics/makeup? TPS is a defensive team, and that strategy obviously works for them as Slafkovsky and company has made it further than most players on that list. They scored 151 goals this regular season and let in just 137, not a huge gap, as a whole they don’t score much but keep the puck out of the net.
Let’s see how that compares to those teams that the guys on the list have played for (not including dman).
Mikael Granlund HIFK: 185 goals for, 152 against
Kakko TPS: 154 goals for, 152 against
Barkov Tappara: 178 goals for, 145 against
Puljujarvi Karpat: 178 goals for, 126 against
Laine Tappara: 177 goals for, 136 against
Lehkonen Kalpa: 172 goals for, 145 against
Terevainen Jokerit: 183 goals for, 155 against
Ikonen blues: 145 goals for, 165 against
Armia Assat: 176 goals for, 132 against
Of course this is the regular season, but you can see the considerable gaps in production. And I don’t think 1 17-18 year old is providing an extra 30-35 goals. TPS has continued their brand of hockey in the post season. They don’t score a ton, but they play defensively and that’s how they win.
Second: To build on the previous points the tactical setup that Slafkovsky is instructed to perform could be considerably different than how lehkonen, teravainen or puljujarvi was deployed.
Could Slafkovsky’s production be better in the post season? Sure it could, but I don’t think just looking at those numbers paints the entire picture of TPS path to the finals (in comparison to those other players and their teams).
Finally: If TPS got eliminated in 4,5,6,7 games like guys on this list did, he’d have a higher PPG. If they lost in 4, he’d be tied for first. If they lost in 5, he’d slot in right behind Laine.
3 years older, but there is history there too. Teemu Pulkinnen outscored teravainen in the playoffs when he was 2 years older, Kasperi Kapanen outscored Aho when he was 1 years older and Goldobin outscored Aho when he was 2 years older. There is also the opposite, Puljujarvi the way out produced Hintz in the 2015-16 playoffs but who is the better player now?On the other hand TPS' top line is actually scoring at a high clip, including Pyyhtia who is only two years older than Slafkovsky. That Slafkovsky's line doesn't score much could be on him or his linemates I wouldn't know.
3 years older, but there is history there too. Teemu Pulkinnen outscored teravainen in the playoffs when he was 2 years older, Kasperi Kapanen outscored Aho when he was 1 years older and Goldobin outscored Aho when he was 2 years older. There is also the opposite, Puljujarvi the way out produced Hintz in the 2015-16 playoffs but who is the better player now?
Thanks for that, I don't watch any Liiga so I am definitely not informed. I watched Slafkovsky highlights and hope the Habs can get him but then I wasn't too impressed by the numbers. You bring up good points though, context matters.Few things.
First: How do we factor in team tactics/makeup? TPS is a defensive team, and that strategy obviously works for them as Slafkovsky and company has made it further than most players on that list. They scored 151 goals this regular season and let in just 137, not a huge gap, as a whole they don’t score much but keep the puck out of the net.
Let’s see how that compares to those teams that the guys on the list have played for (not including dman).
Mikael Granlund HIFK: 185 goals for, 152 against
Kakko TPS: 154 goals for, 152 against
Barkov Tappara: 178 goals for, 145 against
Puljujarvi Karpat: 178 goals for, 126 against
Laine Tappara: 177 goals for, 136 against
Lehkonen Kalpa: 172 goals for, 145 against
Terevainen Jokerit: 183 goals for, 155 against
Ikonen blues: 145 goals for, 165 against
Armia Assat: 176 goals for, 132 against
Of course this is the regular season, but you can see the considerable gaps in production. And I don’t think 1 17-18 year old is providing an extra 30-35 goals. TPS has continued their brand of hockey in the post season. They don’t score a ton, but they play defensively and that’s how they win.
Second: To build on the previous points the tactical setup that Slafkovsky is instructed to perform could be considerably different than how lehkonen, teravainen or puljujarvi was deployed.
Could Slafkovsky’s production be better in the post season? Sure it could, but I don’t think just looking at those numbers paints the entire picture of TPS path to the finals (in comparison to those other players and their teams).
Finally: If TPS got eliminated in 4,5,6,7 games like guys on this list did, he’d have a higher PPG. If they lost in 4, he’d be tied for first. If they lost in 5, he’d slot in right behind Laine.
I don't follow enough to have a clear opinion either, but could Liiga be better now then it was because of all the guys who came back from Russia?Thanks for that, I don't watch any Liiga so I am definitely not informed. I watched Slafkovsky highlights and hope the Habs can get him but then I wasn't too impressed by the numbers. You bring up good points though, context matters.
I don't follow enough to have a clear opinion either, but could Liiga be better now then it was because of all the guys who came back from Russia?
He's no lock for #2. Still a chance someone takes Nemec or Cooley before him.Any chance he makes it to 3rd overall ? Id say unlikely . And virtually impossible he falls to 4th. I want him on the Devils in a massive way but just don’t see it happening at all unless we win the lotto or a team swaps picks with us trading up .
I think after Wright that the next 4 could go in any order. Nemec, Jiricek, Slof, Cooley.Any chance he makes it to 3rd overall ? Id say unlikely . And virtually impossible he falls to 4th. I want him on the Devils in a massive way but just don’t see it happening at all unless we win the lotto or a team swaps picks with us trading up .
Dammit, Devils need at least one of the RHD but it’s not looking good.I think after Wright that the next 4 could go in any order. Nemec, Jiricek, Slof, Cooley.
TPS pretty much has only one line that can generate consistent offense 5v5. The rest are more or less in a checking role and that probably hurts Slaf's production. I don't really see a lot of chemistry between him and his linemates (Rodewald and Steenbergen lately), like you can see he is by far the most talented player on his line but he's also trying to do all the heavylifting on offense by himself which doesn't work for the most part. He can definitely make great use of his linemates when given space but in these tight playoff games there just isn't much of it.On the other hand TPS' top line is actually scoring at a high clip, including Pyyhtia who is only two years older than Slafkovsky. That Slafkovsky's line doesn't score much could be on him or his linemates I wouldn't know.