Oh, it's you again. You pop out of the toilet every two or three years and bring up this midseason ranking I had from almost eight years ago, knowing full well I was not entirely sold on Makar until the spring and moved him to fourth overall -- which is where he was drafted. I don't know whether it's sad or flattering that you have that little insignificant nugget bookmarked.This guy ranked Ian Mitchell ahead of Cale Makar
Just one point.
You separate the CHL leagues, but keep the NCAA as a single entity. That is a slightly sneaky way to skew the numbers to support your argument.
I personally don't care where players come from, but you should compare the NCAA and the CHL the same way. Either as a single entity, or by separate leagues/conferences.
I think he'll get his second assist on the Leonard winner.
This is a good point. Hagens will inevitably rack up points on that line, but he is playing third fiddle to Perreault/Leonard, which shouldn't be a surprised given that they are two of the most dominant players in college hockey. I do think it's a testament to Hagens' ability to mesh with his linemates that he has seamlessly taken on that role considering that he would be the centerpiece on pretty much any other line. He certainly is not a selfish player.For Hagens' sake, I don't love the Perreault-Hagens-Leonard line. Obviously, they're going to produce great numbers and Hagens is genuinely making major contributions, but it often feels like Hagens isn't playing his game -- he's trying to fit into Perreault/Leonard's game. I think from just watching his play, he looked better when he wasn't with Perreault and Leonard.
But I also don't think they're going to move Hagens, because he's the only good choice to play with Perreault and Leonard. So hopefully, he'll be able to adapt to that role.
Without Smith back I think it makes a lot of sense for BC to split Perreault and Leonard 5v5.For Hagens' sake, I don't love the Perreault-Hagens-Leonard line. Obviously, they're going to produce great numbers and Hagens is genuinely making major contributions, but it often feels like Hagens isn't playing his game -- he's trying to fit into Perreault/Leonard's game. I think from just watching his play, he looked better when he wasn't with Perreault and Leonard.
But I also don't think they're going to move Hagens, because he's the only good choice to play with Perreault and Leonard. So hopefully, he'll be able to adapt to that role.
We hear this about every undersized center. Finesse counts for those guys, not strength. Shot placement, not power.... The only concern is that he may never develop enough strength to maximize his abilities. I'm talking about shot power and winning battles to get to the center of the ice
Well Hughes is a couple inches bigger than Hagens and his skillset is vastly superior to Hagens. There is more of a concern with Hagens being a franchise caliber talent because of that. Strength has limited a lot of players potential in the past and winning the center of the ice can be a significant factor when deciding between top end prospects. Even Jack Hughes hasn't established himself as a true #1 CENTER in the league yetWe hear this about every undersized center. Finesse counts for those guys, not strength. Shot placement, not power.
Jack Hughes is never going to overpower anyone to get to the slot, but he does so routinely.
(No, I'm not equating Hagens to Hughes.)
False.Well Hughes is a couple inches bigger than Hagens and his skillset is vastly superior to Hagens. There is more of a concern with Hagens being a franchise caliber talent because of that. Strength has limited a lot of players potential in the past and winning the center of the ice can be a significant factor when deciding between top end prospects. Even Jack Hughes hasn't established himself as a true #1 CENTER in the league yet
Imagine stuffing this many errors in such a short paragraph.Well Hughes is a couple inches bigger than Hagens and his skillset is vastly superior to Hagens. There is more of a concern with Hagens being a franchise caliber talent because of that. Strength has limited a lot of players potential in the past and winning the center of the ice can be a significant factor when deciding between top end prospects. Even Jack Hughes hasn't established himself as a true #1 CENTER in the league yet
Jack Hughes has not established himself as a true #1 Center...lol...WHAT??Well Hughes is a couple inches bigger than Hagens and his skillset is vastly superior to Hagens. There is more of a concern with Hagens being a franchise caliber talent because of that. Strength has limited a lot of players potential in the past and winning the center of the ice can be a significant factor when deciding between top end prospects. Even Jack Hughes hasn't established himself as a true #1 CENTER in the league yet
Just saw a stat on EP. He has a shooting percentage of 3.4% at Boston college. 2022-23 he had a 27.5% in the NTDP AND 2023-24 it was 18.5% in NTDP.
What’s going on with Hagens?