Brayden point skates like the wind though“How did Brayden Point fall to the 3rd round??”
NHL GMs:
He didn't back in the dayBrayden point skates like the wind though
Not when he was drafted.Brayden point skates like the wind though
And why Cristall shouldn'tand thats why he went in the 3rd
You do understand skating. It's the rest of the people that don't know shit. Even his top end speed isn't bad per say, it's only bad because you're expecting every sub 6'1 players to be Paul Byron fast.The more I follow the prospects, the more I realize I don’t understand anything about skating. In my opinion Crystal has a lack of top end speed, but in terms of another parts of skating - he’s a very good. Especially considering that top end speed is an aspect that is easiest to fix.
Also I’ve always thought Drouin and Jarvis are pretty good skaters, especially Drouin. But local experts say they are awful
I don't get how Kent Johnson can go 5th overall, but Andrew Cristall is this ultra polarizing prospect.
He’s got great edges/agility, very shifty in tight spaces, but average acceleration and top speed. I’d say he’s a good skater, but not a great one.You do understand skating. It's the rest of the people that don't know shit. Even his top end speed isn't bad per say, it's only bad because you're expecting every sub 6'1 players to be Paul Byron fast.
You're right about his skating though, he is very good. It's just the perception people have that is wrong.
Drouin never really had any skating problems though, you may be mistaken on the comments. Or maybe it's more of people thinking Drouin should be McDavid because he's a small skilled player. Also if anyone told you Jarvis was a bad skater, you can just ignore their opinion.
I agree, I see the same thing. His situation is very similar to Suzuki in his draft year. I think theyre very similar in toolkits. Cristall is somewhat uninvested defensively and when the puck isnt around though. Suzuki always played a much more sound pro game and now he biases defensively a lot more, maybe to bridge the gap between his horrible team.He’s got great edges/agility, very shifty in tight spaces, but average acceleration and top speed. I’d say he’s a good skater, but not a great one.
I do think people sometimes confuse pace with skating. Regardless of his skating, Cristall often likes to “slow the game down” and play at a lower pace. He can do this because of his vision, hands and agility/elusiveness - WHL defenders are afraid to pressure him and get burned, so they back off, giving him the time and space to slow it down. He often plays a slower paced game not because he’s a slow skater, but because he prefers to play that way.
I do think pace (combined with size) is the biggest question mark around him, though. Big guys can slow it down and protect the puck at the NHL level, but it’s often harder for small guys to pull off. Will he be able to keep his current game at the NHL level? Or if not, will he be able to adapt and play with more pace? TBD.
Hot take: Cristall is closer to Dumais and Petan than Kent Johnson.I don't get how Kent Johnson can go 5th overall, but Andrew Cristall is this ultra polarizing prospect.
They're literally the same size. One is just 3 inches taller. Measure that out with your hand, it's a marginal difference.Kent Johnson was a different type of player all together. Centre, good size. Not a comparison to Cristall.
They're literally the same size. One is just 3 inches taller. Measure that out with your hand, it's a marginal difference.
Johnson is a winger.
Both are high skill players that slow the game down.
It's fair to compare them.
Everyone knew he projected as a winger in his draft year.Johnson was a centre in the BCHL, and college. He has been put on the wing in CB, but he was drafted as a centre.