F Alexis Lafreniere (2020, 1st, NYR) part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.

ConnorMcMullet

#12 Colby Cave
Jun 10, 2017
10,364
18,253
Classic recency bias. Laine dominated the wjs just like Lafreniere while doing it as a year younger,
won playoff MVP in a men’s league and then went to the senior men’s championships against nhl stars and won the tournament MVP.

It’s perfectly fine to think Lafreniere is the better prospect but don’t act like he’s a clear cut better prospect then what laine was.
Except there's more to a draft season than just the international tournaments. Laine was always considered a great prospect, but his Liiga playoffs are what really drove the hype over the top. Lafreniere has been incredible all year in the QMJHL, as he has the past two seasons.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dominance

Nabrules

Registered User
Nov 5, 2018
1,590
1,660
Except there's more to a draft season than just the international tournaments. Laine was always considered a great prospect, but his Liiga playoffs are what really drove the hype over the top. Lafreniere has been incredible all year in the QMJHL, as he has the past two seasons.

you just said it yourself, was great in his league play and playoffs too. Winning the mvp in the playoffs of a very good men’s league and then against NHL stars is more impressive than dominating the QMJHL, to me anyway.

Like I said it’s very reasonable to think Lafreniere is the better prospect during their draft years but Laine is definitely of the same level prospect wise.
 

TheBeastCoast

Registered User
Mar 23, 2011
32,318
33,383
Dartmouth,NS
you just said it yourself, was great in his league play and playoffs too. Winning the mvp in the playoffs of a very good men’s league and then against NHL stars is more impressive than dominating the QMJHL, to me anyway.

Like I said it’s very reasonable to think Lafreniere is the better prospect during their draft years but Laine is definitely of the same level prospect wise.
Projection matters. Nathan Mackinnon never dominated the WJC at 17 like Laine did but the raw talent and projection of his talent makes him a better prospect then Laine was. It is a similar thing with Lafreniere.
 

DJB

Registered User
Jan 6, 2009
16,536
11,388
twitter.com
I just watched a recent game where Lafreniere mostly played RW.

For those that watch him often, is that something that happens quite a bit?

Because the dual wing ability is extremely valuable for line combinations
 

McNurse

Registered User
Sep 2, 2015
1,502
858
I just watched a recent game where Lafreniere mostly played RW.

For those that watch him often, is that something that happens quite a bit?

Because the dual wing ability is extremely valuable for line combinations
I haven’t watched him often at all, but he does seem to play both wings frequently
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJB

SympathyForTheDevils

Registered User
Feb 22, 2010
1,063
1,098
Quebec City
I just watched a recent game where Lafreniere mostly played RW.

For those that watch him often, is that something that happens quite a bit?

Because the dual wing ability is extremely valuable for line combinations

Haven't watched him that much lately, but that may have to do with Rimouski's lack of depth at RW, and with him occasionally playing with Guay and Bolduc.

But there's no doubt in my mind he could play both wings at the NHL level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJB

Breakers

Make Mirrored Visors Legal Again
Aug 5, 2014
22,660
21,263
Denver Colorado
I hope what ever GM wins the lottery walks up to the Mic, doesnt say Rimouski or The QMJHL and mispronounces lafreniere's last name and mistakenly selects Alexis Laferriere out of the USHL the 90th ranked skater in this draft


And that kid walks up the stage and everyone is just speechless.

It would be the greatest draft story of all time.
 

Toronto makebeleifs

Registered User
Jul 4, 2014
1,994
707
Probably going to get alot of disagreement due to shiny new toy syndrome that's prevalent on HF. I see laf as a 30-40 guy occasionally dancing with a ppg. Yes, he will be a very good player, but in the mold of Taylor Hall. Likely won't be a top 10 goal scorer, but a solid 30 goal guy isn't terrible.
 

newfy

Registered User
Jul 28, 2010
14,964
8,721
Probably going to get alot of disagreement due to shiny new toy syndrome that's prevalent on HF. I see laf as a 30-40 guy occasionally dancing with a ppg. Yes, he will be a very good player, but in the mold of Taylor Hall. Likely won't be a top 10 goal scorer, but a solid 30 goal guy isn't terrible.

Hall is a very solid first overall pick. Hes not the homerun, absolute best first overall pick like a McDavid or Mackinnon but hes still very good. Hes got a hart trophy and multiple seasons above point per game, over his career he averages 74 points a season. Thats with him basically never playing on a good team.

If a team gets a Taylor Hall calibre player and can get him a center to play with theyll be very happy with Lafreniere at first overall.
 

Fixxer

Registered User
Jul 28, 2016
3,224
1,631
he may not end up as good, but Crosby. His edge work, his grinder like play style and young 2 way game reminds me of later Crosby.
He reminds me more of Perry. Bigger than Crosby, a grinder playing with an edge and being a winger.
 

Pavel Buchnevich

"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
Dec 8, 2013
59,555
26,241
New York
Probably going to get alot of disagreement due to shiny new toy syndrome that's prevalent on HF. I see laf as a 30-40 guy occasionally dancing with a ppg. Yes, he will be a very good player, but in the mold of Taylor Hall. Likely won't be a top 10 goal scorer, but a solid 30 goal guy isn't terrible.

I agree. I doubt he’ll be the superstar that some think with the hype he’s received this season, but I think he’s a safe bet to be an elite NHL winger without being one of the superstars of the league.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nabrules

scoutman1

Twitter - scoutman33
Feb 19, 2005
3,253
583
www.facebook.com
I agree. I doubt he’ll be the superstar that some think with the hype he’s received this season, but I think he’s a safe bet to be an elite NHL winger without being one of the superstars of the league.
I still think Byfield has raw talent that could make him the better NHL player in the future...possible Byfield does not turn out to be better than Lafreniere but with his size and skill package I think he has a chance to turn out better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nabrules

Dirtyf1ghter

Registered User
Aug 7, 2019
2,592
1,692
It depend what you called superstar.

McDavid ? Crosby ? Probably not.

Kane ? Ovechkin ? Panarin ? Kucherov ? Yes he can and it's not forbidden to think that they are superstars.

Nothing prevents him from thinking that he has the potential to be the best winger in NHL. Between McDavid (1997) and Wright (2004), he's the best prospect among canadian forwords.
 

Dirtyf1ghter

Registered User
Aug 7, 2019
2,592
1,692
I still think Byfield has raw talent that could make him the better NHL player in the future...possible Byfield does not turn out to be better than Lafreniere but with his size and skill package I think he has a chance to turn out better.

Gradually, I rather built the opposite opinion.2 Years ago, he seemed to be the best player born in 2002. Since then, many have caught up to him or even doubled him. Currently, we are still at the hypothetical potential because he didn't show anything exceptionnal during all the major events in which he participated unlike the others elite prospects (Stutzle, Holtz, Raymond, Perfetti, Drysdale) who seem to have made more progress than him.

In my point of view, Lafrenière 2018/19 is better than Byfield 2019/20.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RacMan93

tfong

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 29, 2008
10,417
986
www.instagram.com
It depend what you called superstar.

McDavid ? Crosby ? Probably not.

Kane ? Ovechkin ? Panarin ? Kucherov ? Yes he can and it's not forbidden to think that they are superstars.

Nothing prevents him from thinking that he has the potential to be the best winger in NHL. Between McDavid (1997) and Wright (2004), he's the best prospect among canadian forwords.

How is Ovie in this second tier?
 

Pavel Buchnevich

"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
Dec 8, 2013
59,555
26,241
New York
It depend what you called superstar.

McDavid ? Crosby ? Probably not.

Kane ? Ovechkin ? Panarin ? Kucherov ? Yes he can and it's not forbidden to think that they are superstars.

Nothing prevents him from thinking that he has the potential to be the best winger in NHL. Between McDavid (1997) and Wright (2004), he's the best prospect among canadian forwords.

I think you can look at the Taylor Hall comparison before. I don't think thats a bad comparison from an accomplishments standpoint. Thats probably around the level of player Lafreniere will be. I would not say that Kane, Ovechkin, Panarin, Kucherov are in that same tier of player. I would say thats at least a tier above the level of player that Hall is.
 

Dirtyf1ghter

Registered User
Aug 7, 2019
2,592
1,692
How is Ovie in this second tier?

In my point of view Ovechkin is overhyped by his goals but in terms of overall level he has never been a player like Crosby or McDavid. Lafrenière is a much more complete wingman than Ovechkin has ever been. Apart from shooting 8 times per game for 1 goal, Ovechkin doesn't offer much else on the ice. Neither the best russian, neither the best Capital's player. So you think Ovechkin is top 3, me I think Ovechkin isn't top 10. It's like that.

Taylor Hall ? He's the player who looks like him the most in terms of junior career but that doesn't mean that they will have the same career in NHL That said we talk about an MVP. Categorical predictions about 18 yo players are useless. At 18 to 20, Panarin wasn't drafted Kucherov was a late 2nd round. Nothing can prevent saying that Lafreniere can't be a player like them.
 

tfong

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 29, 2008
10,417
986
www.instagram.com
Ovechkin in his prime drove the play heavily. Given the impact of goal scoring to win games and his physical presence and pp proficiency, he's still a superstar imo so I disagree with your statement of what a superstar is.

A Hall tier comparison is fair to laffy I think.
 

Dirtyf1ghter

Registered User
Aug 7, 2019
2,592
1,692
In his prime Backstrom was the playmaker. Ovechkin has always been an individualist puck-eating player. I just said that Ovechkin could be considered as superstar ("Kane ? Ovechkin ? Panarin ? Kucherov ? Yes he can and it's not forbidden to think that they are superstars). I'm just saying that Ovechkin isn't better than Panarin, Kucherov or Kane and that he never had McDavid and Crosby's level.

Lafrenière didn't even start to NHL. As already mentioned, it"s useless to say conclusively that Lafrenière will have the same level as Hall because their performances in CHL are similar. No one predicted that Draisaitl, Carlsson, Pastrnak or Panarin would become superstars. Nobody had planned the career of Brady, Jordan, Federer or Cristiano Ronaldo at 18.

Lafrenière may become better than Ovechkin or may become worse than Cole Perfetti. All experts repeat again and again that the draft isn't an exact science. In general, fans predict what they want to see.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad