jonlin
Registered User
- Nov 11, 2011
- 6,050
- 5,882
Stars window will actually open in 2yrs when Benn, Faksa, Lindell and Suter are gone.Stars could send Suter/Fakska and have a better blue line in their window for however long that is.
Stars window will actually open in 2yrs when Benn, Faksa, Lindell and Suter are gone.Stars could send Suter/Fakska and have a better blue line in their window for however long that is.
I`d actually do this trade from Dallas point of view. Seguin`s contract is even shittier while shorter and Jones could very well get back on track paired with HeiskanenYou could probably get Dallas to bite on the full term if the return cap balancer is Seguin.
Funny how people mention worst contracts in the league and you hear it’s Nurse, it’s Bobrovsky, it’s Seth Jones when useless Seguin had 4 years left at almost 10m.
Chicago would need an add but Seguin to balance the cap for 4 of 7 years and the cap going up I think you could get Dallas to bite. Improve the return by eating the 2 years left on Suter. That’s one of the few way I could see getting high trade value on Seth Jones. Eat a couple bad shorter contracts and try to max out the futures package.
ELO is a band from the 60s or 70s that had a few chart topping hits, if you've listened to a classic rock station then you'll probably recognize them
Electric light orchestra and yes I haveELO is a band from the 60s or 70s that had a few chart topping hits, if you've listened to a classic rock station then you'll probably recognize them
Give us Nurse then.Chicago is supposed to be making trades for bad contracts and not paying to dump them. Is it opposite day?
You are stuck with that albatross. Unless you want Nurse?
Electric light orchestra and yes I have
Thanks
ELO is a band from the 60s or 70s that had a few chart topping hits, if you've listened to a classic rock station then you'll probably recognize them
except Jones is younger and a way better player than OEL but go on withHere Hawks fans are saying to take on EOL teams are going to have to pony up multiple first round picks.....but Seth Jones, who has a longer contract, is a cap dump....
With what could be coined "Blackhawk fan logic ", to get rid of Jones contract the Hawks would have to throw in the first overall as a sweetener.
Can't have it both ways.
Seth Jones has a 9.5 million cap hit until 2030.except Jones is younger and a way better player than OEL but go on with
Seth Jones has a 9.5 million cap hit until 2030.
No matter how you want to frame how much better he is then ELO, Seth Jones ain't worth a 9.5 cap hit. Not with bone head plays like this one;
Seth Jones is a number one defenseman on the Hawks by default, not because he's an actual number one defenseman.
List this dirty dozenSeth Jones is overpaid. While he is a 1st pairing caliber D, I don't view him as a #1. If you are looking at RHD, there are easily a dozen teams that would play him in their top pairing (not just the Hawks). Seth Jones is the least of the Hawks problems. The problem is the best LHD option you could pair him with last year was McCabe and they are playing in front of Mrazek/Stalock and with 3/4ers of a roster that is AHL caliber.
Guys that led their respcetive team in TOI per game as RHD....Savard (MON), Pionk (WPG), Deangelo (PHI), Spurgeon (MIN), Gudbranson/Peeke (CBJ), Marino (NJ), Jokiharju (BUF), Hronek/Myers (VAN), Pullock (NYI), Zub (OTT), Ceci (EDM).List this dirty dozen
Not close at all.How close is this:
CHI: Jones
TOR: Marner + Murray (no retention)
?
Where's the value for the Leafs?How close is this:
CHI: Jones
TOR: Marner + Murray (no retention)
?
I think the only way to make it work is for Chicago to take back a player on an equally bad contract but maybe with less years. They can handle the bigger cap hits now so may as well absorb as much as possible until cap becomes an issue. If they, say, trade for an OeL as part of the deal it's 3 less years which means a buyout would be easier to swallow for him 3 years down the road than for Jones. It's better than wasting a retention slot for 7 years on Seth.It's a hard contract to trade, cap wise, as I doubt Chicago would entertain retention for 7 years. I like him as a player and think he can turn it around, unlike most on here, but still think the contract will be hard to move without another high cap player coming back.