He's not that different from Lars Eller who got bigger deals than that relative to the cap and had no issues getting value.
Why is everyone downplaying Lars to glaze Jake? Eller was able to up his game and be the top Centre for the Caps during a short burst during their Cup run. Thinking Evans could do the same for Suzuki is madness.
I could live with 4x5. We'd have a shutdown PK specialist locked up for the rest of Suzuki's prime and you can plug him into the 2C spot short term as a shut down center if need be.
Evans at 3 is a stretch and you wanna pencil him in as a 2nd line Centre?
For some reason fans don’t understand how hard these guys are to find and seem to assume every contending team has this function solved. They don’t, these guys are fairly difficult to acquire because teams don’t trade them.
Those contending teams also don't normally sign those guys for 5x4 either.
He would be CAR second best center.
Yes and we can all see now that the Canes are clearly not a contender.
this dumb narrative needs to stop, value the player for how he plays
Actually if you sign the guy for 5 fricking years you also have to evaluate how he'll be playing at the tail end of his contract.
Suzuki
Dach
Beck
Kapanen
That would be a disaster
Well we've just recently seen that Evans without Heineman wasn't too hot either. I honestly think a Heineman - Beck - Armia line could be solid. Yeah, Armia at 2yrs at 2.5.
F it. 3.25 for 8yrs while we're at it. Jiminy Crickett people, remember the old Habs adage: "Love your players but don't fall in love with them."
I dont understand how NHL teams are being so cheap with the guys that work the hardest? Specially when they know the cap is going to go up?
Yeah. Hardest workers should make the most! That's not how it works in real life buddy. Or else guys like Steve Begin, Paul Byron and David Savard would've been making 10 million per. Talent matters.
He makes 1.7M now and he's worth at least double that easily, in today’s money.
So what? we have to make up for what he missed out on earlier? That's the kind of thinking that got us the Gallagher contract.
Because people didn't learn their lesson with Armia the first time
I'm down with re-signing him on the cheap. Like I said earlier 2yrs at 2.5 would be fine. Placeholder until Florian and Davidson are ready. Not really sold on Tuch.
...why not really try Roy for ten games alongside Caufield and Suzuki? Or, alongside Heinemann and Beck on a kid line, with Laine playing on the Suzuki line?
To be honest I've kinda given up on Roy just like Harvey-Pinard. Joshua because of laziness and lack of drive whereas Raphael just because of injuries.