DrEasy
Out rumptackling
But if I wish it very hard to be settled, it will be settled.Either that or they settled which set of laws will apply to the rest of the case moving forward.
But if I wish it very hard to be settled, it will be settled.Either that or they settled which set of laws will apply to the rest of the case moving forward.
Either that or they settled which set of laws will apply to the rest of the case moving forward.
If you read discovery motion 144, I think you'll see the case hinged on this point of the two laws and which one had precedence. I agree it is not clear as mud, but I am sticking with my assumption that it is being settled.
Indeed. And this is how the powerful can get away with things that the rest of us can't. I really hope he doesn't.I guess if Melnyk can make it apparent that he can drag this out costing them 100s of thousands in legal fees, they may as well settle for far less now which will amount to more than the remainder they'd be left with after nuisance suit legal fees.
I guess if Melnyk can make it apparent that he can drag this out costing them 100s of thousands in legal fees, they may as well settle for far less now which will amount to more than the remainder they'd be left with after nuisance suit legal fees.
Unless the legal fees are also up for grabs. There are some court motions where the loser has to pay the fees for both parties.
Sure, on The People’s Court it happens all the time.
Unless the legal fees are also up for grabs. There are some court motions where the loser has to pay the fees for both parties.
Do you have a link for discovery motion 144?
Only thing I can find is the docket entry 144 which is a discovery motion.
https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=18225647
OK, I'll bite - what does this mean exactly?
So now I'm getting a warm and fuzzy feeling that it's NOT settled!That the previous request was granted by the judge.
it is still hanging on that motion #144 that seems to be settled.
I no longer get a warm fuzzy feeling that it is settled entirely.
Senators continue to battle Melnyk's ex-pilot over $13,000, despite labour board ruling
It just never ends with Melnyk trying to avoid paying someone...
The article states Melnyk reimbursed the sens for personal flights.Melnyck is flying on private planes for business unrelated to hockey and paid for by the paying fans of the Ottawa Senators - there can be no bigger insult to this fan base.
Anyone who wonders why we are trying to freeze him out, send them this article. The man has no dignity.
Senators continue to battle Melnyk's ex-pilot over $13,000, despite labour board ruling
It just never ends with Melnyk trying to avoid paying someone...
This feels like the whole gig economy debate. Are you an employee of uber or can they treat you as a contractor to get out of all sorts of employee protections?I don't get this at all.
How can Capital Sports be on the hook for the contract pilot's vacation pay if they are not an employee of Capital Sports? Pretty sure that's why the final pay was never agreed upon when CSE got the invoice. I would fight it too. On principle.
Morgan testified that she tendered her resignation because the job required her to work nearly 19 days per month on average, compared with the 12 days per month she had expected to put in. Melnyk paid her a salary of $130,000 per year.
I wish i could only work 12 days per month.