KingCanadain1976
Registered User
A contract that expires in 2017. Not an NHL defenseman, but I wouldn't mind a body to replace Honka in the AHL if you have a spare.
so king or shore ?
A contract that expires in 2017. Not an NHL defenseman, but I wouldn't mind a body to replace Honka in the AHL if you have a spare.
King would be 7th on ur team in scoring This is coming from a very defensive team. He is also playing top 6 mins in la. He is a Plus 7 and plays the tougher defensive mins. He also plays on the pk alot. His points are all 5 vs 5 points as he gets little to no power play time. So him for a defenseman who has been a healthy scratch is not a bad offer to me.
whats the +?
so king or shore ?
A C level prospect or and AHL D that can replace the Void created by keeping Honka and Lindell in Dallas
If that's what you want, OK, and we can flip King for a pick. Like I said, doesn't need to be a blue chipper but some kind of useful-ish AHL player would be nice if you can't bear to part with an NHL player that we wouldn't want anyway.
can you retain on hamhuis I would do a 2nd and Zach Trotman for hamhuis at 2 millon
No. We can take King or another expiring deal if you need to make the money work this year but next year is your problem.
well i would want something small back with Hamhuis if you're getting a 2nd and king( i value king at a 2nd and 3rd ) say a 4th So Hamhuis and a 4th for king and a 2nd ? fair deal ?
I guess, you seem to think King is pretty good so we could get that 4th back.
shore or king and a 3rd for hamhuis
Whats the ask on Dowd