NOA
Registered User
- Apr 17, 2015
- 3,310
- 1,659
This is the million dollar question to me. Because there are major pros and cons to eachMy question is….what do you think is better for the organization right now? Start turning it around a bit, be a mid-pack or lower playoff seed or just struggle so bad out of the gate they have to do a complete reset of coaching and mgmt?
For the sake of their culture, recruitment of players, current young guys not jumping ship, fans still coming to games - they need to win some games this year. In an ideal perfect scenario but yet realistic world they are a 7th seed this year and fighting or at least believing they can reach 6th seed. However, that means keeping guys like Kyrou around and losing on important assets. Not to mention, that also means Dave/BJ are still leading the charge next year and imo that’s not good enough long term. So it’s just wasting time
If they want to be better for the long term then they need to completely suck this year, trade away guys like Kyrou and Cohen and get this rebuild right. Fire Dave/BJ and reset. It probably costs you a lot to do it but I think at this stage you have to. My biggest fear is losing guys like Spence/Terrance. These guys need to develop and we need them here, not demanding a trade. It’s becoming a drastic situation
Now if I were the owner? I’m still blowing up things this offseason. If this team finishes 8th seed even, I’m simply asking why the hell we wasted real assets on a middle line player (Gilmartin) to be the same crap team we have been without him. It doesn’t make sense. If you are a 8/9 seed but guys like Spence / Terrance get all the ice time, I can live with it. To waste that on something like Gilmartin is a huge red flag about the mindset that Dave Brown is in. He’s not approaching things realistically. BJ is not a head coach and the fact that they gave him the full duties despite doing nothing more than Hartsburg did is disgusting. Yes I know, at times he had them playing better. But that was only because the players despised Hartsburgh. It gave them a little jump but eventually that is going to wear off. Especially when you still aren’t developing properly. Their PP is wretched, their SO still involves a defender shooting first, and their faceoffs are embarrassing. They aren’t COACHING. That’s the issue. And because Dave can’t see that or didn’t see that last year with BJ is why he’s the bigger issue.
I like Jim, he’s a good guy and believes in the city. But he needs to be a bit more cutthroat. This can’t be acceptable. I’m sure he has a great relationship with Dave but the direction we are taking is concerning. In 5 years, our philosophy and product on the ice hasn’t changed. It’s been the same. You would think after 3 years you would address that. Certainly after 5 years it’s time to panic. Even if you don’t fire Dave, you need to move him elsewhere in the office and bring in a new GM to provide a new voice. Dave has become too loyal and too stubborn thinking that he can fix things rather than just admitting he’s made some mistakes and taking a new approach. A change is needed regardless of how they finish this year. Will it happen? I highly doubt it