Prorated to equivalent secondary assist value he has 44 assists on the season so far. Still not bad.More than a half of Hutson's points are secondary assists?
6 v 5 you are saying is even strength in that graphic?Again. Look at the pic you posted. It's even-strenght. You've already been warned about this. This stat sheet includes empty net goals, where he is 0gf 13ga.
You've just proven once more how dishonest you are.
I dare you to post an equivalent with 5v5 only, but I know you won't because you've been challenged on this already and still haven't put up.
Hutson's 5v5 GA/60 is 2.87. Hardly a bad defensive stat.
He said 6 vs 5 is not 5 on5.6 v 5 you are saying is even strength in that graphic?
Never mind, I think I get it now.
6 v 5 you are saying is even strength?
More than a half of Hutson's points are secondary assists?
Or rushes where he gains the zoneWhich are often timely passes or long outlet passes. He opens up the play.
Don't forget to mention -15...LOL Montreal fans are so deluded thinking the guy pacing 5 goals on the year is going to win the Calder
I think this is a point that bears repeating... the winner of the Calder trophy doesn't necessarily go on to have the best career. Cellebrini is 18y years old and Hutson's 20. It's not the same thing even if they are playing different positions. But that doesn't (or at least shouldn't) factor into the Calder voting.Celebrini is awesome and may even have a better career than Hutson but right now, this season, the above cannot be stressed enough. What Hutson is doing is incredible. The fact that he is about to insert himself within a list that only includes guys that played in the 80s is just nuts. All the while doing it on a team that is very average.
Sure because preventing goals on the PP simply doesn't matter right?Again, the poster pointed out that Matheson only plays more because he's on the PK. Hutson plays more at ES and on the PP.... Honestly no one who watches more than 2 or 3 habs game would say that Matheson gives you a better chance to win right now. No one.
Yes. Empty net play are considerate like ES play.6 v 5 you are saying is even strength in that graphic?
Don’t like this argument.You don't seem to understand what I'm saying it's not forever just right now, ie rest of the season and your coach MSL seems to agree since he is playing one guy a hell of alot more right?
But maybe I'm wrong about habs fans knowing alot about hockey, it seems fantasy stats rule the day.
Lol what?? I never said that. No idea who you have me mixed up with.That Flyers fan is pretty funny but let's not put all Flyers fans in the same boat, he's the most delusional poster on HF.
The guy still think that York was a better pick then Caufield lol.
Keep digging. Maybe you will find gold73% of Michkov and Celebrini's points are primary points. 47%(rounded up) of Hutson's are primary points.
No one said that, but you are not picking Matheson for his PK ability either, he isn't more than average there.Sure because preventing goals on the PP simply doesn't matter right?
73% of Michkov and Celebrini's points are primary points. 47%(rounded up) of Hutson's are primary points.
73% of Michkov and Celebrini's points are primary points. 47%(rounded up) of Hutson's are primary points.
Hurts don’t it73% of Michkov and Celebrini's points are primary points. 47%(rounded up) of Hutson's are primary points.
Lets just say, that even if you didn’t say that, it wouldn’t be surprising for anyone if you didLol what?? I never said that. No idea who you have me mixed up with.
73% of Michkov and Celebrini's points are primary points. 47%(rounded up) of Hutson's are primary points.