Hello!!Is this still epic? Seems like a pretty boring year Calder wise. One runs a bad teams PP, one was hurt, and one wasnt as good as the hurt guy.
Hello!!Is this still epic? Seems like a pretty boring year Calder wise. One runs a bad teams PP, one was hurt, and one wasnt as good as the hurt guy.
So what you're saying is that a particular team wins more when one of their better players scores in that game?Here I'll give you another stat that MIGHT enlighten you on his impact.
When Hutson gets a point in a game:
24-11-1
When Hutson doesn't get a point in a game:
6-15-4
So what you're saying is that a particular team wins more when one of their better players scores in that game?
This kind of analysis is utterly pointless - every full-time player should show exactly the same breakdown.
I think a better analysis would be in terms of goals created - something as simplistic as team record just doesn't tell you anything meaningful.But that's exactly the point. He is one of the team's best players. The poster I responded to was talking of secondary assists as if Hutson is leeching off other better players on the team. Habs are 7-14-1 when Suzuki doesn't get a point, similar to Hutson.
Just as an aside, and we know such stats are totally useless since what Hutson is doing right now seems to be immaterial but Hutson is currently 22nd on the all-time rookie D points record.This isn't fantasy hockey, Hutson is 45th in TOI for all Dman and if you were to do a total redraft throw everyone in the pool for the rest of the season there would be easily 30 Dman taken ahead of him for the single year redraft.
Celebrini might be on the cusp of 60th forward in such a scenario but still outside.
I would expect any good offensive defenseman to have more than half of their assists be secondary assists. His percentage of primary assists vs secondary assists is not out of line with other defensemen.Hutson tied for 4th in the league in secondary assists. Over half his points are secondary assists.
One of the worst defensive d-man in the league.
Don’t like this argument.
1) could easily be time management for a rookie, it’s a long season and they often get gassed. Think we saw this before 4 nations where the wear of the long season was slowing him down and then after he perked right back into form.
2) coaches get things wrong all the time. If he truly believes Matheson is better….. ok we also had a coach play David desharnais as our 1st line center for 2 seasons.
Sure but like I said we saw Matheson do fine offensively last season, he is an all situation Dman playing Top #1 Dman MPG.Matheson is getting demolished offensively by Hutson so where is he making the gap up. Defense? Matheson sucks bad aswell. He’s good for a laughable gaffe a game
Carefull your talking about this yrs Calder winner.Hutson tied for 4th in the league in secondary assists. Over half his points are secondary assists.
One of the worst defensive d-man in the league.
If it's so easy to have secondary assists, why every Dmen don't have 30-40 in a season lol.I love when people dismiss secondary assists like they don't matter, or that D men aren't more likely to be the secondary than the primary on a scoring play. Learn the game!
I guess 2 things here.Just as an aside, and we know such stats are totally useless since what Hutson is doing right now seems to be immaterial but Hutson is currently 22nd on the all-time rookie D points record.
And Celebrini is currently 343rd on the all-time rookie points record. Assuming he can get to, say 60 pts, Celebrini would end up in 120th all-time rookie position (Hutson would be 7th).
Hutson, Karlsson, Bouchard, Seider, and Gohstisbehere are the only Dman over 35 points who have more secondary assists than they do other points. so out if the top 22 NHL dman for points, 17 have more primary points than secondary.I love when people dismiss secondary assists like they don't matter, or that D men aren't more likely to be the secondary than the primary on a scoring play. Learn the game!
Some secondary assists are more impressive than others. Same can be said for primary assists as well.I love when people dismiss secondary assists like they don't matter, or that D men aren't more likely to be the secondary than the primary on a scoring play. Learn the game!
It's easier to understand when you're a Sharks fan and you get to see what the low end of skill is among NHL defensemenIf it's so easy to have secondary assists, why every Dmen don't have 30-40 in a season lol.
Math is off here.Hutson, Karlsson, Bouchard, Seider, and Gohstisbehere are the only Dman over 35 points who have more secondary assists than they do other points. so out if the top 22 NHL dman for points, 17 have more primary points than secondary.
Seems like it's more likely for the top Dmen to have more primary points.
53% of Hutson's assists are secondary. Compared to the top 5 dman for scoring:
Makar - 70% primary assists
Werenski - 67% Primary
Hughes - 67% Primary
Hedman - 63% Primary
Dahlin - 66% primary
We can accept that Hutson is racking up points at an impressive level while also realizing that what he's doing isn't in the same ball park as the true top offensive dmen in the league
Those are primary points not primary assistsHutson, Karlsson, Bouchard, Seider, and Gohstisbehere are the only Dman over 35 points who have more secondary assists than they do other points. so out if the top 22 NHL dman for points, 17 have more primary points than secondary.
Seems like it's more likely for the top Dmen to have more primary points.
53% of Hutson's assists are secondary. Compared to the top 5 dman for scoring:
Makar - 70% primary assists
Werenski - 67% Primary
Hughes - 67% Primary
Hedman - 63% Primary
Dahlin - 66% primary
We can accept that Hutson is racking up points at an impressive level while also realizing that what he;'s doing isn't in the same ball park as the true top offensive dmen in the league
Math is off here.
Makar - 56.5%
Werenski - 54.3%
Hughes - 56.5%
Hedman - 53.8%
Dahlin - 56.4%
Hutson - 40.9%
I wouldn't expect Hudson to ever be a big goal scorer as his shot is not a strength of his game. More of a puck management type of defenseman. Personally, if I'm ranking the traits I want my offensive defenseman to have, I prioritize passing and skating over the heavy shot, though it's always great to have all 3 in one guy, but you don't expect a defenseman that lasts until round 2 to be a perfect player.
yea i read this chart wrong, thanks for the check. https://www.icydata.hockey/player_stats/primary-and-secondary/47/statsThose are primary points not primary assists
Hutson has a 17:24 ratio while makar has a 25:20 ratio
Hutson a1 ratio: 41%
Makar a1 ratio: 56%
Werenski: 53%
no cope needed when we get to watch this every game:The cope has moved on to primary vs secondary assists
Now compare celebrini to draisatl and Michkov to kirill kaprizovyea i read this chart wrong, thanks for the check. https://www.icydata.hockey/player_stats/primary-and-secondary/47/stats
and updated my post. Weaker point, but still valid, especially the part that every other top 20+ dman except a few have more 1a than 2a. Hutson is making plays at an amazing level, especially for a rookie, but he is still far behind the big dogs.