ChuckNorris4Cup
Registered User
- May 31, 2018
- 3,192
- 2,428
Yeah hopefully the same for Pettersson by the deadline.Good for Jared! He'll probably sign a contract that he won't live up to. Good thing for him that it won't be with the Canucks.
Yeah hopefully the same for Pettersson by the deadline.Good for Jared! He'll probably sign a contract that he won't live up to. Good thing for him that it won't be with the Canucks.
Yeah hopefully the same for Pettersson by the deadline.
Thats 44% of our roster thoughIf we're trading underperforming players (relative to last year), that's basically the whole team aside from Hughes, Garland, and DeBrusk.
Yup pretty much everyone besides Miller, Hughes, Garland, Debrusk and Sherwood should be free game to be moved, team needs a shake up, these slow starts that have been going on for years under 3 coaches needs a change.If we're trading underperforming players (relative to last year), that's basically the whole team aside from Hughes, Garland, and DeBrusk.
Yup pretty much everyone besides Miller, Hughes, Garland, Debrusk and Sherwood should be free game to be moved, team needs a shake up, these slow starts that have been going on for years under 3 coaches needs a change.
No not really for what he's being paid for no, point per game player, plus he's the Canucks best face off guy, he's not underperforming.Miller is also underperforming, particularly considering his deployment.
No not really for what he's being paid for no, point per game player, plus he's the Canucks best face off guy, he's not underperforming.
Could you humour me and use the American teams in your equations?Math really isn't your forte.
Could you humour me and use the American teams in your equations?
What percentage chance does an american team have to make the finals. If a canadian team has 44% like you say. Id likeyou to show your work using 25 instead of 7. Like 12.5 instead of 3.5Sorry, it's not clear what you're asking for.
No I know and yes he's down from last years stats, but still producing at a point per game pace so can't really get that upset, it's the other guy making $11.6M being the 5th highest paid player in league, and it's not just based off his points, it's his lack of strength in general I can't stand, so I'd be more than happy to move him. I wonder if that Necas trade is still available from last season...You have to account for his age - the later years of his deal he will be expected to underperform his salary, so he needs to outperform it right now.
That said, I don't have a problem with him. But he is underperforming comparative to last season.
What percentage chance does an american team have to make the finals. If a canadian team has 44%. Id likeyou to show your work using 25 instead of 7. Like 12.5 instead of 3.5
No I know and yes he's down from last years stats, but still producing at a point per game pace so can't really get that upset, it's the other guy making $11.6M being the 5th highest paid player in league, and it's not just based off his points, it's his lack of strength in general I can't stand, so I'd be more than happy to move him. I wonder if that Necas trade is still available from last season...
I guess that would make sense in a 200% worldSure, no problem.
So it's 25/16. That's 1.56.
Maybe where you're getting hung up is that you have to account for there being 2 spots in the finals, not just one. So in any given year, there will be 1.56 US teams in the finals, and 0.44 Canadian teams.
Over two years, that becomes 14/16 odds . Over 3 years, 21/16.
Well duh that's what the emoji was for lol. Debrusk is working, anything is possible.I somehow doubt it. I have my doubts that Necas would be playing like he is right now if he was on this team.
I guess that would make sense in a 200% world
Gambler's Fallacy. The odds have no bearing on the outcome from previous seasons. Other than that, statistically, you're right from a simplicity sake.
Well duh that's what the emoji was for lol. Debrusk is working, anything is possible.
Your canadian math was 3.5/16 accounting for half of canadas teams making the playoffs. Why didnt you do 12.5/16 for american teams?I guess in a way it is 200%, if you look at it as being 100% for each spot.
There's actually quite a bit of them I'm surprised, but yes they can be confusing agree. But $6.5M compared to $11.6M would of been much better imo.The emojis on this site are pretty limited and rather confusing.
Your canadian math was 3.5/16 accounting for half of canadas teams making the playoffs. Why didnt you do 12.5/16 for american teams?
There's actually quite a bit of them I'm surprised, but yes they can be confusing agree. But $6.5M compared to $11.6M would of been much better imo.
So if us teams have over 3 times chance of making the finals, how does a canadian team have a 44% chance?Oh, you want me to run it through from the beginning again for the US?
Sure.
Each team has a 1 in 2 chance of making the playoffs, so half of the teams will make it, ie 12.5 as you mention. Each team has a 1/8 chance of making it out of their conference into the finals. So that's 12.5/8, or 1.56, or 25/16.
I'm treating each season individually, there is nothing from other seasons taken into account.
Where are you getting 14/16 and 21/16 over multiple years?
It's 7/16 every year.
I mean Miller was unable to even lace the skates for a good portion of the season.Yup pretty much everyone besides Miller, Hughes, Garland, Debrusk and Sherwood should be free game to be moved, team needs a shake up, these slow starts that have been going on for years under 3 coaches needs a change.
So if us teams have over 3 times chance of making the finals, how does a canadian team have a 44% chance?