He's not that good. Sorry. And will be worse into his 30s.
We have 3 good defensemen. That's a problem. Giving Pionk an anchor contract, while letting Ehlers or Connor go to make room for it, is criminal.
Everybody loves a good scorer.
Nikita Chibrikov plays with our same no good 2C and not good enough Perfetti. Scores a couple of goals in 4 games. Fits in nice on PP2 making room for Pionk to shoot. Even blocks shots.
But fans don't appreciate a couple of hard PK minutes. Shot blocks. A 60 point forward, 16 minute forward to most has more value than a 30 point 22 minute d-man. Not a single d-man down the lineup has shown any sign of being a steady 20 minute defenseman. And there's only one prospect in the system. Given how long it took Samberg to become a 20 minute defenseman, I think people are hedging their bets here.
Most hockey people would say it's much easier to replace a top 6 winger than a top 4 d-man.
Pionk's one year older than Ehlers. So going forward who's more likely to get injured? The guy playing every game every year or the guy who already missed time this year trying to make a hit, who has some hernia issues? When Ehlers loses a step he's probably in for some serious injuries.
I wouldn't go the distance on a contract for Neal but 5 years with Samberg in his prime seems like a good investment.
As for all the forward prospects what do you with them if you re-sign Ehlers? Everyone will say 3rd line 4th line and never think once of special teams and those hard penalty kill minutes you need. Those role player minutes that are part of why the team is winning. Definitely part of Scott Arniel's strategy. You can't just plug skill guys into defensive roles, Arniel has shown no sign of doing that yet. You can develop them into those roles, but that's a process, usually starts in the A. Do you trade them for defensive help? Has Chevy ever traded prospects, unless they didn't want to be here?
So it's a tough one.
All I know is that there is no way the Jets trade Ehlers this year, because the Salary Cap is going to make it hard for Chevy to keep everyone. And some of the players that will be lost will affect the overall performance in the future. Chevy can't bank on next year or the year after when you have a veteran team in their prime performing. You don't take those kind of results for granted, because the guys who are getting you the results have a limited lifetime of success, and this year it's come together beyond what was expected.
We can talk about career years, but there's also the coaching change. I guess it's Chevy's job to distinguish who is worth what investment on contract year results.
The one question I'd throw out there is who is worth more to this team in the offseason Vilardi or Ehlers?
The type of goals Vilardi scores on the PP, not every player can do that, or is willing to go there. But without him I don't think the PP is as good.
He plays more minutes on a higher line than Ehlers...what's he worth relatively?