The Pionk discussion gets interesting when you add in what he might want in his next contract - I think he is OK but not worth what they pay him now.
But I also realize how difficult it is to find dmen of value on the market - they just don't come up much and we are at the back of the line when they do.
But, in the end, you need to build a balanced blueline:
With his contract in mind, I think he needs a really good partner - which he shouldn't at $6M - he should be the guy on the second pair that can play with most anyone. Not to be over critical, but I always fall back to the contract - he's not cheap. I've always struggled to understand why offensive dmen are paid the way they are - most won't align with my position here but I like my dmen to be able to handle the dzone as well as they do the Ozone - and the good ones do that.
Once Samberg is back, Pionk will look like a $6M dman (mainly due to his offense). I wonder what Ville would look like with Samberg? Assuming the defensive zone heavy lifting was Samberg, he'd be free to display his offense (if it's there) and would likely look a lot better - maybe good enough. Now go out and find a LHD who can defend on the third pair, and you have a lineup that is somewhat balanced (offense vs defense blueline).
You can then pay Samberg because he is going to get paid - and if paired with Pionk (after both contracts), how much would out 2nd pair be costing us? I think you know where I'm going with this.
IMO, the org should be more concerned about defense when spending money on the blueline - we have JoMo who can do his thing on the PP (which is where I see most of the benefit for offensive D) - if you have guys back there that can make an outlet pass, that's all the offense I'm really looking for when you consider the fire power we have up front.