Ehlers Injured - Upper Body

Status
Not open for further replies.

DannyGallivan

Your world frightens and confuses me
Aug 25, 2017
7,627
10,338
Melonville
Ehlers is a prime example of why I wish the league would make someone who intentionally (or at least seemingly intentionally) injures an opponent should not play again until the injured player is back in the lineup on his team. I know that it's not feasible or even reasonable, but a guy can dream, can't he?
Hypothetical: McDavid hits fourth line call up and injures him. Call up is out for the season… so is McDavid. It can never happen.

I miss “policemen” and the pre-instigator days sometimes…
 

snowkiddin

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 26, 2016
17,268
28,954
Yep. That will definitely make him change his ways. 6 fines and 2 on-game suspensions. I wonder if he'll get a special discount for the 10th time he's "disciplined" by the league.
Reminds me of when Reaves kneed that dude in the face a couple of years ago against Colorado and he cashed in his DOPS rewards card for 75% off a suspension.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hn777

Guffman

Registered User
Apr 7, 2016
6,357
8,534
Crazy how Ehlers could say he’s ready to go, yet he hasn’t played a game nor joined for practice. Must have been some mind games going on,
Definitely worked on me.

We were all expecting him to play in Game 1 based on what Ehlers said. No one thought he would miss the first four games.
 

Buffdog

Registered User
Feb 13, 2019
8,367
20,347
Hypothetical: McDavid hits fourth line call up and injures him. Call up is out for the season… so is McDavid. It can never happen.

I miss “policemen” and the pre-instigator days sometimes…
League-appointed, independent doctors would have to be involved. Or suspensions based on the average recovery time of inflicted injury

And too bad for McDavid and thr Oilers. That's the whole point of the idea. Deter people for doing stupid shit
 

DannyGallivan

Your world frightens and confuses me
Aug 25, 2017
7,627
10,338
Melonville
League-appointed, independent doctors would have to be involved. Or suspensions based on the average recovery time of inflicted injury

And too bad for McDavid and thr Oilers. That's the whole point of the idea. Deter people for doing stupid shit
Actually I forgot to add one point. The team says the injured fourth liner is “day to day”, especially if the team is chasing the offender’s team in the standings or about to play them again.

The ridiculously inconsistent and totally random decision making of the (ahem) player’s safety group should be overhauled first.
 

cbcwpg

Registered User
May 18, 2010
20,577
21,850
Between the Pipes
Ehlers is a prime example of why I wish the league would make someone who intentionally (or at least seemingly intentionally) injures an opponent should not play again until the injured player is back in the lineup on his team. I know that it's not feasible or even reasonable, but a guy can dream, can't he?

The NHL will never do that ( keep the player who caused the injury out for as long as the injured party is out ) , BUT, what they could do is fine the person who caused the injury, and the fine is paid until the player who was hurt comes back or say for a maximum of one season, in case the injured player doesn't play again.

Say $5.000 ( the current maximum the NHL can fine any player ) for every game the injured party misses.
 

raideralex99

Whiteout Is Coming.
Dec 18, 2015
5,215
10,540
West Coast
Actually I forgot to add one point. The team says the injured fourth liner is “day to day”, especially if the team is chasing the offender’s team in the standings or about to play them again.

The ridiculously inconsistent and totally random decision making of the (ahem) player’s safety group should be overhauled first.
It's not random decisions ... they know exactly what they are doing.
If Scheifele played for certain teams his hit on Evans would have been a heavy fine and if there was a suspension it would have been only 1 game max.
 

abax44

Registered User
Jan 22, 2005
2,695
2,122
It's not random decisions ... they know exactly what they are doing.
If Scheifele played for certain teams his hit on Evans would have been a heavy fine and if there was a suspension it would have been only 1 game max.
Lol
 

cbcwpg

Registered User
May 18, 2010
20,577
21,850
Between the Pipes
It's not random decisions ... they know exactly what they are doing.
If Scheifele played for certain teams his hit on Evans would have been a heavy fine and if there was a suspension it would have been only 1 game max.

I went back in time and watched the NHL Dops video when the suspended Scheifele to compare that to the Hartman suspension ( hit on Ehlers ) and even the Makar suspension, and as far as I can tell the difference was:

Hartman and Makar were both penalized for "Interference" and subsequently received 1 game suspensions. Scheifele was penalized for "Charging" and received his 4 game suspension. The NHL Dops seems to treat Charging as a much more grievous act than Interference, hence the higher suspension. I looked at other Charging suspensions and a lot of them were more than 1 game with quite a few being 3 games. They seem to look at Charging as predatory, where Interference isn't.

I am not defending the DOPS because they really have no clue what they are doing, but they do seem to treat Charging as worse than Interference,
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: hn777

LowLefty

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Dec 29, 2016
7,718
14,077
I went back in time and watched the NHL Dops video when the suspended Scheifele to compare that to the Hartman suspension ( hit on Ehlers ) and even the Makar suspension, and as far as I can tell the difference was:

Hartman and Makar were both penalized for "Interference" and subsequently received 1 game suspensions. Scheifele was penalized for "Charging" ad received his 4 game suspension. The NHL Dops seems to treat Charging as a much more grievous act than Interference, hence the higher suspension. I looked at other Charging suspensions and a lot of them were more than 1 game with quite a few being 3 games. They seem to look at Charging as predatory, where Interference isn't.

I am not defending the DOPS because they really have no clue what they are doing, but they do seem to treat Charging as worse than Interference,
In a way, it was charging - although not as defined.
Ehlers was coming in full clip and Hartman steps in front of him a lays a hit -
Same impact and should be evaluated that way - but obviously wasn't.
If these guys are breaking everything down to x's and o's when they review this stuff, you can expect a lot of bad calls on all the tuff that doesn't fit neatly into their definitions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hn777

raideralex99

Whiteout Is Coming.
Dec 18, 2015
5,215
10,540
West Coast
I went back in time and watched the NHL Dops video when the suspended Scheifele to compare that to the Hartman suspension ( hit on Ehlers ) and even the Makar suspension, and as far as I can tell the difference was:

Hartman and Makar were both penalized for "Interference" and subsequently received 1 game suspensions. Scheifele was penalized for "Charging" and received his 4 game suspension. The NHL Dops seems to treat Charging as a much more grievous act than Interference, hence the higher suspension. I looked at other Charging suspensions and a lot of them were more than 1 game with quite a few being 3 games. They seem to look at Charging as predatory, where Interference isn't.

I am not defending the DOPS because they really have no clue what they are doing, but they do seem to treat Charging as worse than Interference,
He's what I have with that problem.
Scheifele was fasting as fast as he can to get to the net to stop him from scoring. Evans came around the net and step in front of Scheifele.
Its like if I'm driving through an intersection and some idiot goes through a red light and I T-bone him ... its my fault???
Scheifele has just as much right to the ice he never turned to Evans ... Evans turned into him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad