Confirmed with Link: [EDM/BUF] McLeod + Tullio for Matt Savoie

Bryanbryoil

Pray For Ukraine
Sep 13, 2004
87,750
38,170
No reason the coach started Savoie as a winger in his first 2 games at the Rookie Tournament. Put an 18 year old newcomer as the C on Savoies line. I'd say this coach is canned by Mid December.
Savoie is not going to be a top 6 center as long as McDrai are here. He is being transitioned to the wing, may as well start that at a lower level and see how he does with it.
 

McFlash97

Registered User
Oct 10, 2017
7,698
6,859
Savoie is not going to be a top 6 center as long as McDrai are here. He is being transitioned to the wing, may as well start that at a lower level and see how he does with it.
It's easier to dominate at C in the pro league then get transitioned to the W, then to be a natural C, in a new environment , dont get to play and Dominate as a C and immediately be transitioned to the W. Confidence out the door. Terrible prospect Development tactics. Not even letting the guy get a feel for the game from His natural position has fail written all over it. Edmonton's prospect development team is as inept as it gets.
 

McJadeddog

Registered User
Sep 25, 2003
20,738
6,014
Regina, Saskatchewan
He'd probably produce in the top 6 here. That's where he put up points. Biggest problem was he was a churchmouse in the playoffs (consistently) to the point of being actively bad, which makes him a perfect Sabre.

McLeod is a perfectly fine regular season player, maybe even a pretty good regular season player. But is absolutely ALLERGIC to physical contact. You can't win with that player in the playoffs. When you consider that we needed to shed salary, and got back a pretty decent young player (who likely never becomes the player McLeod is truthfully), and 'm still perfectly fine with the deal.

Glad he is playing well for the Sabres, I've always liked McLeod as a person, seems like a good guy.
 

Stoneman89

Registered User
Feb 8, 2008
28,428
23,920
McLeod is a perfectly fine regular season player, maybe even a pretty good regular season player. But is absolutely ALLERGIC to physical contact. You can't win with that player in the playoffs. When you consider that we needed to shed salary, and got back a pretty decent young player (who likely never becomes the player McLeod is truthfully), and 'm still perfectly fine with the deal.

Glad he is playing well for the Sabres, I've always liked McLeod as a person, seems like a good guy.
The prototypical perimeter player.
 

CycloneSweep

Registered User
Sep 27, 2017
51,134
42,769
He was traded because we needed to free up money
to bad Skinner has turned out as a 4th liner

McLeod is a perfectly fine regular season player, maybe even a pretty good regular season player. But is absolutely ALLERGIC to physical contact. You can't win with that player in the playoffs. When you consider that we needed to shed salary, and got back a pretty decent young player (who likely never becomes the player McLeod is truthfully), and 'm still perfectly fine with the deal.

Glad he is playing well for the Sabres, I've always liked McLeod as a person, seems like a good guy.
It’s just unfortunate that we replaced him with an equally perimeter player in Skinner.
 

TheNumber4

Registered User
Nov 11, 2011
44,190
55,118
Shoulda been an Oiler for life. Shoulda kept him around like we shoulda kept Cogliano around to be that speedy 2-way 3C that did his best work for other teams.

I get it though. He had an inconsistent year and doesn’t hit enough. But neither do the Knob Hockey Oilers in general. We were bottom 4 in the entire playoffs for hits/60, we still made it to the Cup finals. McCleod is gone and we are still the lowest hits/60 in the entire league this year while still being one of the best defensive teams in the League. Listen to Knob when asked about hits and he downplays its importance saying better teams with high puck possession usually don’t hit much. McCleod was very effective defensively despite the lack of physicality. He might not hit but his literally best-in-the-League speed always had him in the right positions and he was a responsible and effective 2 way player. I’d say his Speed more than makes up for a lack of physicality, and for a team that McDavid describes as being at their best when they play fast, it was a perplexing decision to me to move on from McCleod.

I did like Henriques game in the playoffs though. I would describe it as crafty, smart, and grittier than expected. I could see the Oilers preferring Henrique over Mcleod based on that performance. But the kicker is age regression and progression. Henriques at an age where he’s likely to downtrend as a player, and Mcleod is at the age where he’s likely to improve as a player. Then there’s the $1M difference in salary between the two as well.

Savoie can make it all worth it though. But he has to make it as a Top 6 player worthy of his draft status. That’s not a guarantee to happen.
 

McDNicks17

Moderator
Jul 1, 2010
42,671
32,903
Ontario
I know the doomers want to start some victory laps, but maybe let's wait until McLeod doesn't have a 36% shooting percentage and 14.29% onSH%.

For context on how silly those numbers are, Jeff Skinner would have 16 goals with that SH% and the Oilers would have double the goals for with Draisaitl on the ice if he had that onSH%.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TB12

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad