- Sep 28, 2007
- 6,245
- 306
Absolutely mind-boggling, that there is serious talk about Lundqvist not being good enough in the playoffs after yesterday's game. Only in Rangerland...
He let in one softie in the first game, but was stellar otherwise. If you want to blame someone there's more than enough places to look.
Start with the PP. That lost us both games more or less. We had 3+ minutes of PP time including more than one minute 5-on-3 when game 1 was tied at 1. It failed. We had two powerplays late in the third and OT in game 2 and it failed.
Look at Rick Nash, our supposed offensive focal point who has vanished for most of the time. It's not even the playoffs, he was invisible in most games down the stretch when we were fighting for the playoffs. Hitting the post just ain't good enough.
The list goes on and on, Richard being back to his brutal self, our defensive not being at last year's level etc. and last but not least Torts and his complete lack of any idea for the offense whatsoever.
He let in one softie in the first game, but was stellar otherwise. If you want to blame someone there's more than enough places to look.
Start with the PP. That lost us both games more or less. We had 3+ minutes of PP time including more than one minute 5-on-3 when game 1 was tied at 1. It failed. We had two powerplays late in the third and OT in game 2 and it failed.
Look at Rick Nash, our supposed offensive focal point who has vanished for most of the time. It's not even the playoffs, he was invisible in most games down the stretch when we were fighting for the playoffs. Hitting the post just ain't good enough.
The list goes on and on, Richard being back to his brutal self, our defensive not being at last year's level etc. and last but not least Torts and his complete lack of any idea for the offense whatsoever.