**Lineups are susceptible to changes and thus ratings are to be prioritized
TOR VS BOS
Toronto Maple Leafs
77 Bertuzzi, 88 Matthews(-), 76 Domi(+)
75 Knies, 82 Tavares, 84 Marner
77 Robertson(+), 76 Holmberg, 84 Nylander
74 Dewar, 71 Kampf, 70 Reaves
76 McMann(+)
79 Rielly, 77 Brodie
81 Benoit(+), 80 McCabe
78 Edmundson, 79 Liljegren(+)
76 Lyubushkin
81 Samsonov(-)
81 Jones
82 Woll(+)
Boston Bruins
76 Heinen, 77 Zacha, 88 Pastrnak
85 Marchand, 77 Coyle, 83 DeBrusk
73 Lauko, 77 Geekie, 80 Frederic
71 Beecher, 76 Boqvist(+), 73 Maroon
78 Van Riemsdyk
88 Lindholm, 87 McAvoy
77 Grzelcyk, 82 Carlo
75 Shattenkirk, 79 Peeke
87 Swayman
86 Ullmark
Key components of the matchup
by percentages
(All inside the whole of 100)
A)Exploitation of Toronto defensive targets (Brodie, Rielly, Liljegren);
The Bruins have oftentimes been excessive adherents to the saying: “ Every puck on net in the playoffs is a good play”. Well, it's a good play… when you can disguise the shot via shot angles, screening or man advantage in the crease area. The legendary Patrick Kane’s Stanley Cup OT winner in 2010 had all of these components rolled into it for example. The Bruins however have had a tendency to hit “ extreme panic mode” and throw purposeless and hail mary shots on net late in heavily contested series in which the opponent had adequate defensive personnel to negate any potential beneficial outcome from such tactics. The thing is however that Toronto has a few defensemen who have shown an outright difficulty in stopping simple actions of the likes. So look to see if Boston can exploit the “targets” via net presence for rebound opportunities or 2nd and 3rd chances for mid grade or high grade opportunities (during Pastrnak’s or Marchands shift for high grade chances).
Likelihood of event happening: 50%
Effect: Critical
B) Lulling them to sleep
The Boston Bruins finished very high in the standings. However, with closer examination, we can quickly see that they accumulated a lot of extra time points which means that instead of fighting to win the game in the 3rd, perhaps more than any team they were quite happy to let the game go to overtime. So, since a habit of low effort and execution has been established in the team, the Maple Leafs can exploit that by playing low event 2nd periods then making gigantic push in the last 10 minutes of the 3rd to test to Bruins ability to execute potent offensive plays with high high pressure. Outside of Pastrnak (and he might even struggle playmaking wise), the task could gradually become heavy.
Likelihood of event happening: 10%
Effect: Good to very good as the series goes the distance due to past Bruins track record
C) Getting past the Marchand decoy
Brad Marchand is a known commodity. The data is clear. While he’s sure to stir up emotions, he's not to be the focal point of the Leafs physical “validation”. That would be Charlie McAvoy. Sans Chara, although possessing Norris level talent, McAvoy has had a tough time keeping his defensive confidence up and making his shifts hellacious should be the true focus of the Leafs.
Likelihood of event happening: 15%
Effect: Very good
D) Two is better than one
American-Latin sensation Auston Matthews is as pure a goal scorer as almost anyone in NHL history. And in Toronto of all places, the demands placed upon a talent of this magnitude is in my opinion a little too much (considering his persona). Unquestionably the focus of Boston's defensive gameplan, its tough to picture him breaking free of the defense, the expectations and past disappointment. Ovechkin could muster a dangerous shot from anywhere, anyhow, anytime. Matthews is gifted with receiving a pass and instantly creating an “open shot” via crisp and subtle deking maneuvers. And that particular skill set could be even more effective by pairing with another goal scorer in Nick Robertson. Défensive attention in Robertson's case and really chemistry might scare Keefe of doing such a thing but a Robertson, Matthews and say Holmberg (sound defensive positioning) line might give Matthews that much needed added skating and shooting threat (in Robertson) to work his talents and keep his confidence up since compared to other all time goal scoring legends, Auston has perhaps the least elusive abilities being such a big target without the hands of Lemieux or the skating and motor of Ovechkin.
Likelihood of event happening 5%
Effects: Unknown potential gem to further explore perhaps next season
E) Stopping Pastrnak primary passing reads (high danger passes) as he’s a conscientious playmaker and not a natural one. The reaction time and play evaluation success that are not obvious (high danger passes) is not Elite (a step below MacKinnon and gigantic steps below Kucherov and McDavid. Similar although slightly unfavorable to Panarin.
Likelihood of event happening: 5% (insufficient defensive personnel at forward and goaltending insecurity)
Effects: Very good
F) ….
Remaining 15% of events are left for injuries. Either team losing a star player (Lindholm, Matthews, McAvoy, Marchand, Nylander, Marne
r, Pastrnak) would mean doom more so than in other matchups.
Effects: Critical