flyerslducks
Registered User
- Feb 15, 2017
- 12,750
- 13,609
hahahahaha what an amazing scout."His parents are pretty tall"
lol what a master class in genetic heredity
GM: Why should we draft/sign this kid
Scout: His parents are thick
hahahahaha what an amazing scout."His parents are pretty tall"
lol what a master class in genetic heredity
he does control the pace...then turns it over and allows montreal to control the pace. So either he controls or he lets montreal control lol. He has been a lot better in this game, much more aggressive. He just needs to play a little faster
too important of a game and he hasn't seen a ton of shots. Absolutely no hesitation in hart getting inIf we hold on does Moose get the start tomorrow or do you let Hart do the back to back?
If we win this round Hagger worth a 1st from some GM looking for young talent.Hagg had himself a good first, for his standards. He actually made a couple defensive players.
His second period was downright Haggian though. Dude was fighting the puck and losing very badly. The puck pummeled him so deeply the docs may have to stop the fight.
I edited that post late, but here's the results so far...Huh. Thanks. I don’t think I would mind that with someone better than Grant between Giroux and Laughton. Or really, you could put either of those two in the middle anyway and probably be better off.
Poor Giroux...
with Grant
7:49
43.75 CF%
38.80 xGF%
without Grant
2:00
100.00 CF%
100.00 xGF%
Meanwhile Grant...
with Giroux
43.75 CF%
38.80 xGF%
without Giroux
28.57 CF%
13.85 xGF%
I’d go with Hart. At his age, he’ll be fine. Plus if they win tomorrow, they’ll have 5 or 6 days off before the next series.If we hold on does Moose get the start tomorrow or do you let Hart do the back to back?
If we hold on does Moose get the start tomorrow or do you let Hart do the back to back?
If we hold on does Moose get the start tomorrow or do you let Hart do the back to back?
T H I C Chahahahaha what an amazing scout.
GM: Why should we draft/sign this kid
Scout: His parents are thick
compared to his dogshit games 1-3, he has been a lot better. He still can play much better but he has been more aggressive. He actually made two really nice backchecks that we never saw in the other games. Nice to see that and something to build off ofHe really hasn't at all.
I’d go with Hart. At his age, he’ll be fine. Plus if they win tomorrow, they’ll have 5 or 6 days off before the next series.
We have a goalie.Missed the 2nd. Quick synopsis?
Why would you ever say such horrible things?Elliott didn't look worn down and garbagey in his appearances so I can trust him.
People made up their mind about him the moment that trade happened and now it doesn't matter what he does.
Missed the 2nd. Quick synopsis?
Why would you ever say such horrible things?
Still too many attempts to force plays, IMO.To that end, one of our adjustments appears to be a hell of a lot more bank passes, ideally with two forecheckers pressuring one guy in the neutral zone so one of them has a likelyhood of getting around and picking up the bank. Even one on one a lot of Habs have been caught flat in the face of a rushing Flyers going after a puck banked off the boards past them.
Instead of trying to force their way straight through thee middle.