GDT: ECF: Game 3 - New York Rangers vs Florida Panthers, 3pm ET, ABC

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rsswmu

Registered User
May 20, 2014
772
665
Interesting how corsi, scoring chances, fenwick and a slight edge in high danger scoring chances are deemed irrelevant, yet a slight edge in XGF is deemed the be all end all.

The Panthers are also leading all of the above again in game #3.

This was certainly productive.
Yes having irrelevant possession where you get low danger shots does not translate to winning. Panthers have dominated this game though.
 

Firsov99

Registered User
Feb 17, 2006
4,952
3,724
Trocheck made Reilly Smith and Jussi Jokinen a good line. Laf and Panarin are a bit better than both.
Talent-wise no doubt. But Laf was not playing up to his potential for a while. That’s probably why a lot of fans thought that he was a bust. Glad that he is turning this around. A lot of his goals are just flat out spectacular individual efforts.
 

Grifter3511

Registered User
Nov 3, 2009
2,382
2,546
It was reasonable to say he was. He is not a big guy, usually the smaller guys either show it right away or not at all, its those guys who are 6'4-6'5 who rely on size who can take 3-4-5 years but I was even beginning to think he was going to be a disappointment, maybe not a full blown bust ala Daigle but maybe Pat Falloon like
There's countless players out there who didn't reach their peak or demonstrate it for a number of years after entering the league, regardless of their size. But on hfboards, if you're not a stud after one season you never will be.
 

BMOK33

Registered User
Oct 5, 2005
27,481
4,941
As a ranger fan I fully expected 5v3. Very odd indeed
Some stat dude on reddit claims its first instance of two penalties on one guy in postseason and none on the opposition since 1998 so maybe why many of us were surprised. Its probably an overlooked technicality that league should change
 
  • Like
Reactions: DuneGoon84

Firsov99

Registered User
Feb 17, 2006
4,952
3,724
Galant is mostly to blame for that. He played the same lines and the same 5 guy on the PP for the whole 2 minutes. A complete waste. There is 82 games. Give all the young guys a shot.
Possibly. I don’t follow the Rangers that closely. We’ll see if he continues playing at high level next year.
 

LaffyTaffy13

Registered User
May 10, 2022
1,491
2,472
you know what is between shoulder and back? its neck
Grazing the shoulder to land on the neck on a crouched over player is illegal now. If anything shouldve been called on e-rod for embellishment. We can all agree he embellished there right?
 

behemolari

Registered User
Dec 1, 2011
6,222
2,765
As a ranger fan I fully expected 5v3. Very odd indeed

"
(Rule 19 – Coincidental Penalties) COINCIDENTAL PENALTIES (all penalties assessed at the same stoppage).

Team A Captain’s choice to play one player short-handed for four minutes or two players shorthanded for two minutes. Should he choose the latter, an additional team A player must be placed on the penalty bench to serve the minor penalty for A3."

Very odd indeed
 
  • Like
Reactions: DuneGoon84

GG96

Registered User
Feb 21, 2020
1,562
2,012
The clips will all come out in the coming days, so I guess you’ll see. . . If you want to
Can’t wait for you to see the reverse angle and deny that he hits 85% shoulder and back. It’s definitely a two minute penalty. Nothing more.
 

Pablo El Perro

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 10, 2007
24,513
12,720
Talent-wise no doubt. But Laf was not playing up to his potential for a while. That’s probably why a lot of fans thought that he was a bust. Glad that he is turning this around. A lot of his goals are just flat out spectacular individual efforts.
They look like that, but having guys who can get you the puck in the right spot and win battles helps. Most of us on here tend to think players don't play with four other skaters. That's a big part of development.
 

notsocommonsense

Registered User
Apr 24, 2013
4,533
4,743
Grazing the shoulder to land on the neck on a crouched over player is illegal now. If anything shouldve been called on e-rod for embellishment. We can all agree he embellished there right?
He definitely embellished. Which doesn’t make throwing an elbow at a guy legal.
 

behemolari

Registered User
Dec 1, 2011
6,222
2,765
Grazing the shoulder to land on the neck on a crouched over player is illegal now. If anything shouldve been called on e-rod for embellishment. We can all agree he embellished there right?

Its impossible to tell if someone is faking when get hit into the neck with elbow on full speed play, hope you understand that
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad