+3 fighting majorsWhat kind of numbers are we expecting out of him this year? Something around 15 goals 20 assists?
+3 fighting majors
15/20 seems reasonable.
What kind of numbers are we expecting out of him this year? Something around 15 goals 20 assists?
I'm hoping we see his offense grow into the 40-45 points range
On a good team, would he be top 6 with PP time?I think around 12G 18A this year. We will not be scoring many goals this season.
And that will be a good stat line for this team. On a playoff team he could absolutely get 45 points if he was top6 and PP line.
I’d be pleasantly surprised with something like 20/25.I think he gets more…but it depends on his line mates abd how the PP is.
On a good team, would he be top 6 with PP time?
He doesn’t have a lot of games and he has extremely high expectations. So that normally can complicate things, and he’s an emotional guy," Granato said. "With Dylan, I think, staying in the moment, not getting too far ahead of himself, because his appetite is huge.
Not yetOn a good team, would he be top 6 with PP time?
I want to see him seize a leadership role more than I want to see points. A dogged, "never say die" style of play and leadership. The points will come.
Defensively responsible, fiery but smart, and progress. Goals and points will be fun but should not be the sole measure of any of our prospects success.
Cozens will have 50 points this year.As someone who desperately wanted Trevor Zegras in this draft, the more I watch the kid, the more I like him. I think he has such a good head on his shoulders and wants to be a leader and be part of the solution. I want him to have a good year developing both skill wise and leadership wise. If he got 35-45 points, that would be a bonus, but I know that will be tough especially because everyone knows that he and Mitts will be our top centers and play their best against them.
I still remember drafting Mitts and hopefully someday he can be our Briere. But I definitely like Cozens more and more every day. Maybe he can be our Drury (without the NYR GM part of it).
Well said. Sabres once again not insulating their young players with a veteran center. We needed a 2C for years behind Jack and now without Jack we are pushing Casey and Cozens into 1C, 2C. There needs be a veteran C who takes the difficult assignments while still not taking opportunities away from the kids. I know the Sabres want fast players for the system, one of the reason's Reinhart was traded. Sam doesn't play the way they want, but finding a fast veteran 2C in an Eichel trade should be a focus just as much as a center prospect.The mistake the Sabres make over and over with first round picks is they put them in the NHL right away and give them so much latitude they don't learn how to play the game the right way. They start off well and then when the coaching staff demands they play fundamentally sound hockey, their game hits the skids.
So much. Bringing in a Danault or Pageau would do wonders for development.Well said. Sabres once again not insulating their young players with a veteran center. We needed a 2C for years behind Jack and now without Jack we are pushing Casey and Cozens into 1C, 2C. There needs be a veteran C who takes the difficult assignments while still not taking opportunities away from the kids. I know the Sabres want fast players for the system, one of the reason's Reinhart was traded. Sam doesn't play the way they want, but finding a fast veteran 2C in an Eichel trade should be a focus just as much as a center prospect.