noncents
Registered User
- Feb 25, 2022
- 2,974
- 3,684
he's saying zib kreider smith is the rangers 3rd line. try and keep up with the discourse.???
I'm talking about the players on PP1. What does that have to do with our 3rd line?
he's saying zib kreider smith is the rangers 3rd line. try and keep up with the discourse.???
I'm talking about the players on PP1. What does that have to do with our 3rd line?
What did you guys think about Cuylle's goal? I think Machinehead is right that the bar to overturn a goal for it for getting kicked in is high so not surprising. But kind of looked iffy.
He kicked it but what the NHL considers a kick is pretty much a Premier League PK.What did you guys think about Cuylle's goal? I think Machinehead is right that the bar to overturn a goal for it for getting kicked in is high so not surprising. But kind of looked iffy.
I'm always reminded of the David Clarkson goal against us (that stood!) where he ran up and did a full Frank Lampard, and the league said it was a redirect.I’ve seen less egregious stuff called back
And more egregious stuff stand.
I don’t understand the rule at all.
he's saying zib kreider smith is the rangers 3rd line. try and keep up with the discourse.
It is, and I'd like to see the Rangers update the line order to reflect thathe's saying zib kreider smith is the rangers 3rd line. try and keep up with the discourse.
You mean like Mika’s line getting less 5v5 ice time than chytil’s?It is, and I'd like to see the Rangers update the line order to reflect that
I wasnt ratifying his post, or his ability to follow the discourse. just clarifying and it was tongue in cheek.Well this was a needlessly dickish response.
He ignored the entirety of a long post that was 99% about the issues with Zib and Kreider's performance on the PP1 unit, and reacted solely to the last sentence that referred to Zib as our supposed 1C. Pretty sure I'm not the one having difficulty tracking the discourse.
Again, Zib (and to a SLIGHTLY lesser extent Kreider) has been a gaping black hole on the PP for nearly 20 straight games. It directly cost the team the series against Florida, and it's something that will stand in the way of the team winning a Cup. Considering the team HAS options (Laf, Chytil), it's stupid to keep rolling out the same old thing just because it used to work.
Imagine if we had a legit high end 1C.
5v5 ice time is where it shows. How they're listed on a piece of paper is meaninglessIt is, and I'd like to see the Rangers update the line order to reflect that
Whatever the ice time breakdown is, the Bromance is a problem.
Kreider will be fine when the games matter- he does this shit every year and it drives me nuts every year but the playoffs start and he does nothing but score goals.
I don’t know what the answer is here. That line shouldn’t be our worst line.
To be fair that's the only line right now that isn't playing well so it's not as bad as it could be.
Less than 40 % voted for Panarin.... He was by far the best skater on the ice. Seems like we take him for granted around here
Call me crazy. I wouldn’t sign Shesty for more than 8. He hasn’t earned it. Hank stole series for us, Shesty hasn’t won a game for us in a year.Like a Barkov? Will cost 10 million plus. When they pay Shesty 12 million plus gonna eat up a lot of the cap. Laf did them a favor. Earned my respect. Shesty not so much if he signs that deal.
Call me crazy. I wouldn’t sign Shesty for more than 8. He hasn’t earned it. Hank stole series for us, Shesty hasn’t won a game for us in a year.
If we could somehow liquidate Mika and Kreider into the assets for a young 1C we would have the cap space and we would basically be golden… with Perrault and Othmann and Berard on the way.Like a Barkov? Will cost 10 million plus. When they pay Shesty 12 million plus gonna eat up a lot of the cap. Laf did them a favor. Earned my respect. Shesty not so much if he signs that deal.
Perhaps we can trade them in a package? If Kreider is dealt somewhere would Zib join him? A man can dreamIf we could somehow liquidate Mika and Kreider into the assets for a young 1C we would have the cap space and we would basically be golden… with Perrault and Othmann and Berard on the way.
As long as they're Fil-ing the opposing team's Cuylles with their Kakkos, you can call them whatever you like.What about the KFC line, or does that sound too greasy? .