DoktorJeep
Fair winds and following seas Nikolai.
Listening to Kings media, the defense for Dubois’ lack of production is that he was signed to a long term deal because his future seasons will justify the cost. He is expected to be the #1C who takes over for Kopitar in a few more seasons.
If that is true, I think it’s fair to question why management would choose to pay this player at this time before he’s proven he’s worth the contract and trade pieces. I can’t recall a single player signed under similar circumstances. Where you pay for top of the depth chart now and play him bottom minutes also.
Even Fiala got top six minutes last year when he was on the “third line” at even strength. He was fourth among forwards with over 17 mins a game. This year Dubois is 7th at less than 16 mins a game and playing around one less shift a game than Byfield. So he’s clearly well behind Danault and Kopitar. Neither of whom are having really great seasons.
What made Blake and Luc really believe that Dubois was ready to be a #1C anytime soon?
If that is true, I think it’s fair to question why management would choose to pay this player at this time before he’s proven he’s worth the contract and trade pieces. I can’t recall a single player signed under similar circumstances. Where you pay for top of the depth chart now and play him bottom minutes also.
Even Fiala got top six minutes last year when he was on the “third line” at even strength. He was fourth among forwards with over 17 mins a game. This year Dubois is 7th at less than 16 mins a game and playing around one less shift a game than Byfield. So he’s clearly well behind Danault and Kopitar. Neither of whom are having really great seasons.
What made Blake and Luc really believe that Dubois was ready to be a #1C anytime soon?