Likely a guy you pair with a Zellweger/Fowler style player.After watching how he got all his points in that video, one thing is for sure: He will be the complementary defensemen on the pairing he plays on. Don't see a lot of offensive generating plays there, mainly smart hard shots for tips and random secondary assists. I wish there was a highlight reel of him playing defense and passing so I could see more. Looks like he has a rather weak (power wise) shot as well... That sucks.
I'm copying this from someone who posted the below on the Ducks Reddit.
Scott Wheeler, wrote on the Athletic a deep dive on each team's prospect pool a month or two ago. He ranked Helleson as No. 8 for the Avalanche which he ranked as the 21st best system in the NHL. He ranked the Ducks 5th, that did not include Drysdale or Zegras.
Hopefully he keeps improving and becomes a solid defensive dman with some offensive potential.
Helleson basically fills the #1 and 2 needs for the franchise. Big Physical RHD.
Now it is just a question of how he develops.
I dunno... sure, he does fill a two-way play with a right shot, but I would still draft Jiricek if we had a chance at Jiricek. I wonder if we tried to get the Avs other RHD, Justin Barron, but the Avs wouldn't part with him.
First of all, even with him RHD is still the biggest need for the Ducks lol.
Second of all, even though I agree Jiricek would be literally perfect, the position shouldnt matter at all when drafting in the top 10. BPA even if its in your deepest position.
I’d say higher potential. If he develops offensively like he has been recently, a legit two way #2-3 isn’t entirely out of the questionDepres 2.0
Those guys were 4-5 years out of the draft and had stagnated in development, Helleson is 20I'm not remotely qualified to have an opinion on him specifically, but I feel like when we pick up a young defenseman and people say "he's probably second pairing, maybe third" they always end up being AHLers. Guhle, Fleury.
I don't think so, Depres was a solid #3 defensemen when healthy and playing in his peak here.I’d say higher potential. If he develops offensively like he has been recently, a legit two way #2-3 isn’t entirely out of the question
He has the defensive and physical tools , all that’s lacking is offense, but it has been developing nicely. Verbeek even said himself he is one of the top defensemen of his age group. That’s coming from the AGM who drafted Moritz Seider in the same draft as Helleson.
Based on my friend's analysis (Big college hockey fan (Wisconsin fan but lives in Connecticut so watches a few conferences))How would you guys compare him to Lacombe, Thrun, Moore, and Hinds?
Thrun and Helleson are close as from what I’ve seen of Helleson (WJC and Olympics)Based on my friend's analysis (Big college hockey fan (Wisconsin fan but lives in Connecticut so watches a few conferences))
Thrun
Helleson
LaCombe/Moore
(Hinds- I didnt ask about Hinds, but based on his scouting reports from the draft I'm personally not too enthused)
My favorite type of video where you can watch the entire shift to see him not just highlights...
Some more videos for reference:
Life on the beach and SD Fish Tacos. Doesn't get much better than that.Fly this kid out right now and try to get him signed. Not many places better for a 21 year old guy to live than San Diego...
Life on the beach and SD Fish Tacos. Doesn't get much better than that.
Carne Asada Fries as well