- Jul 25, 2012
- 49,537
- 63,434
I mean there was prob also a 1st and other stuffShockingly bad return for the Blues considering what they already had on the table for Parayko alone.
I think he means it was down the road in the sense that it was being worked on. The two GMs had left home and driven down the road of working on that trade.Can someone help break down the idiom? He says "down the road" but then implies past modal perfect tense...
Depending on what the other pieces were, it’s solid frame work.Yeah, it's basically Minty+1st for Parayko being more or less the Mrtka+1st for Parayko. McTavish+McQueen roughly gets the Norris+Helenius, and then you add a couple assets from there to finish off the Thomas portion of the deal.
He's just a bad writer.Can someone help break down the idiom? He says "down the road" but then implies past modal perfect tense...
Washington has this year's first.Depending on what the other pieces were, it’s solid frame work.
Mintyukov and mctavish are already young nhl players…. McQueen is another potential top 6 center. Just interesting how many pieces Anaheim adds to that…. I assume blues 2nd next year woulda been included, prob another prospect.
Granted I feel like Mintyukov + 1st is too high for Parayko….. pretty sure we heard Anaheim wasn’t willing to do that straight across, so maybe it breaks down
Parayko for Mintyukov + 2nd
Thomas for McQueen, mctavish, 26 1st +
This situation would have happened prior to the carlson trade.... we wouldnt have made the carlson trade if this hapened.Washington has this year's first.
Thomas is about the only one I wouldn't instantly hate for the two Mc's...but that's still a pretty steep price to make the window 'now' without seeing how the team as a whole grows this year. Several of the youngsters have to hit rather than seeing how everyone does/grows and then tweak from there to be able to put the hammer down in 27-28.
So, if McTavish is such a great player why is his name involved in trade rumors?
McTavish’s value is not high if he is constantly being brought up as an asset to move up n trade after trade and proposal.
I mean thomas is involved in trade rumors does that mean hes not great?So, if McTavish is such a great player why is his name involved in trade rumors?
McTavish’s value is not high if he is constantly being brought up as an asset to move up n trade after trade and proposal.
I mean thomas is involved in trade rumors does that mean hes not great?
Knies is involved in trade rumors? is he dog shit?
what kind of basic mentality is this lol.
The rumors have never said anaheim is putting mctavish name out there, they rumors have always said other teams have been asking bout mctavish. Which leads me to believe Anaheim is perfectly content keeping mctavish... but if you can trade him for an upgrade why wouldnt you?
Mctavish stinks, but he still likely has high value around the league due to his youth, pretty good production for his age, his ability to play center, and his draft pedigree. But he stinks. Any team that trades a bunch for him is going to be disappointed.
"Down the road" meant it was progressing, assuming they maybe asking people to waive NTC? Was confirms it was at the deadline.Glad I'm not the only one whose head was exploding over this.
Was def kinda weird way to say it... but i think pretty much this."Down the road" meant it was progressing, assuming they maybe asking people to waive NTC? Was confirms it was at the deadline.
Shockingly bad return for the Blues considering what they already had on the table for Parayko alone.
Wow, that would be huge. I actually like it for both sides.
Lacombe had one year of NHL tape. McTavish has four.Then again two years ago many Ducks fans were saying the same about a 23 year old Lacombe.
What do the Blues fans think about McTavish? This time last year he was considered untouchable or close to it but things have changed a lot over the last 12 months.
I like McTavish but man... his numbers are 49 pts and 21 goals over 300+ games and provides a bit of grit. He's not a center... more like a power forward winger. Skating not good enough to be a center.
At age 23, how much more growth do us fans expect on McTavish? Personally, the max value I give in a trade for him is 50-60 pts and 20-25 goals. He has not shown flashes that indicates he can produce way more than that (so far). Age 23/24 coming.
He’s shown flashes there’s more there…. He’s had stretches where he looked like a low end 1c.
Ive always said habs don’t make good trade partners for mctavish unless we really like ReinbacherI'm not buying it. His best season was 24/25 and this was a free wheeling NHL bottom 10 Ducks roster.
Nobody is offering 60-80 pts and 25-30 goals of value. Career numbers are 49 pts and 21 goals and the best value I offer in a trade is 50-60 pts and 20-25 goals.
You will get offers but if you are big fish hunting, you will have to add a good piece on top and dangle that. Won't be with the Habs because we are after using futures to acquire. Bad fit in that case.
Ive always said habs don’t make good trade partners for mctavish unless we really like Reinbacher
And of course were going to add to mctavish to upgrade.... if we didnt need to add for an upgrade wed just keep mctavish.