He's in that vein, it's a fair comparison style wise, Sam Bennett as well. Any toolsy 2-way center with a good motor, really, that's his game. Trocheck is my personnal comp, at the same age it's real similar.Some are comparing Cootes to Bo Harvat
He's solid but he'd feel more like insurance if Beck doesn't pan out. I don't really see him hitting as a 2CSome are comparing Cootes to Bo Harvat
Any reason why? High motor, high skill, beyond the injury I don't really see what's not to like.I'm not a fan of Carter Bear at all. Hope they take Cootes if he's there
I'm the exact opposite. Team Bear all the way. He's arguably the most NHL-ready and has the tools to slot in any line. Cootes' skating is a major concern to meI'm not a fan of Carter Bear at all. Hope they take Cootes if he's there
Any reason why? High motor, high skill, beyond the injury I don't really see what's not to like.
I think we must have watched different games of his, he was always a difference maker and implicated (and quite skilled) when I watched himHe just exists on the ice, dime a dozen WHL guy who will never be a difference maker. Gallagher minus half the skill when I watch him.
I'm pretty sour on most W guys in general, it's such an inflated league. Next year when MacKenna and the talent bolt for the NCAA, it will only get worse. 100pt guys are going to look like studs, but there is going to be such a weak talent pool , points will be so easy to get.I think we must have watched different games of his, he was always a difference maker and implicated (and quite skilled) when I watched him
I'm the exact opposite. Team Bear all the way. He's arguably the most NHL-ready and has the tools to slot in any line. Cootes' skating is a major concern to me
If he's any of those 3 would be a great pick for HabsHe's in that vein, it's a fair comparison style wise, Sam Bennett as well. Any toolsy 2-way center with a good motor, really, that's his game. Trocheck is my personnal comp, at the same age it's real similar.
I can’t remember a year where so many of the teams drafting top 10 were so willing to trade their pick.
What they end up negotiating in private is a whole other matter. However, it may be another indication of how little some GMs think of this draft class.
The strength and weakness of drafts is almost always over hyped both ways. The elite top end talent at the top maybe doesn’t include elite superstars in this draft; but there will be very good hockey players to be had.
If we end up picking at 16 and 17 we will add two very good prospects to our pipeline, don’t let others convince you otherwise because this is supposedly a “weak” draft.
That’s insane. He has way more skill than Gallagher. For one, he’s a really good playmaker. Gallagher can barely make a tape-to-tape pass.He just exists on the ice, dime a dozen WHL guy who will never be a difference maker. Gallagher minus half the skill when I watch him.
Gallagher was a stud in Vancouver , I was comparing him to his WHL careerThat’s insane. He has way more skill than Gallagher. For one, he’s a really good playmaker. Gallagher can barely make a tape-to-tape pass.
His talent limitations were always present IMO. Some have been exacerbated because of injuries, but he’s always taken a half-second too long to make decisions with the puck on his stick. That’s less important in the WHL though.Gallagher was a stud in Vancouver , I was comparing him to his WHL career
I am going to fight youHis talent limitations were always present IMO. Some have been exacerbated because of injuries, but he’s always taken a half-second too long to make decisions with the puck on his stick. That’s less important in the WHL though.
Would you trade WiFi if it meant moving up from 17 to get center we want? Either Desnoyers or Martin. Whomever they like.I can’t remember a year where so many of the teams drafting top 10 were so willing to trade their pick.
What they end up negotiating in private is a whole other matter. However, it may be another indication of how little some GMs think of this draft class.