Speculation: Post Draft 2024 Discussion

  • Xenforo Cloud has scheduled an upgrade to XenForo version 2.2.16. This will take place on or shortly after the following date and time: Jul 05, 2024 at 05:00 PM (PT) There shouldn't be any downtime, as it's just a maintenance release. More info here

Whom you want us to pick?

  • Silayev

    Votes: 7 8.3%
  • Levshunov

    Votes: 6 7.1%
  • Demidov

    Votes: 34 40.5%
  • Sennecke

    Votes: 10 11.9%
  • Buium

    Votes: 16 19.0%
  • Yakemchuck

    Votes: 1 1.2%
  • Dickinson

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lindstrom

    Votes: 9 10.7%
  • Other

    Votes: 1 1.2%

  • Total voters
    84

Anaheim4ever

Registered User
Jun 15, 2017
9,064
5,659
Yeah if that is who they are set on would rather it be done this way than at 3
and if they trade down to 5 and Columbus picks Sennecke, they get to pick Buium win/win.
I think Columbus is the main threat to pick Sennecke if Anaheim doesnt, even if they are leaning Lindstrom he's another big forward.
 

Dr Johnny Fever

Eggplant and Teal
Apr 11, 2012
21,790
6,377
Lower Left Coast
Not really. Just not a fan of taking a 6' D that high unless he skates and shoots like Makar...and Buium doesn't.

Remember, I'm the same guy who has criticized the Gaucher and Myatovic picks and they certainly are Dirk kind of guys.
You've been pounding your fist about Verbeek not drafting anybody below 6.2. When it sounds like he might, you decide that's when you'll have no confidence in our scouts. So, it's really about how you think they should draft (nobody under 6.2) and not really a trust that they can draft the right guy regardless of size.
 

Dirk316

Registered User
Nov 8, 2004
8,357
2,070
St Petersburg, Fl
This may have been mentioned already, but the Panthers just won the Cup and their two biggest D men were large pylons during the postseason (Ekblad and Mikkola). The rest of their D corps are all either small or slender, based on the height/weight requirement some people seem to have. Forsling, Montour, and Kulikov are all average size or smaller, while Ekman-Larsson is somewhat tall but thin. And as a whole, that's not a particularly physical defense. They're not all soft, but there are no mean bruisers there.
What about the huge physical Las Vegas team that won the previous season?
 

tomd

Registered User
Apr 23, 2003
9,807
5,585
Visit site
You've been pounding your fist about Verbeek not drafting anybody below 6.2. When it sounds like he might, you decide that's when you'll have no confidence in our scouts. So, it's really about how you think they should draft (nobody under 6.2) and not really a trust that they can draft the right guy regardless of size.
Wrong. My point is that Verbeek shouldn't break that 6'2" streak on an undersized D in a position the team is already deep in. I'd be delighted if they drafted Demidov and he is under 6'2".
 

HanSolo

DJ Crazy Times
Apr 7, 2008
98,148
33,529
Las Vegas
1000061828.jpg

Sup boys
 

Ducks DVM

sowcufucakky
Jun 6, 2010
52,649
30,429
Long Beach, CA
But it kind of is a big deal. You can't just hit a button and your excess LD becomes a RD or RW.

In reality, those top line players are rarely available. Drysdale for Gauthier trades rarely happen and even in that case it took him forcing PHI to trade him.

For example, let's say you have a 1LD, and the team needs a 1RD. You draft the another 1LD with the intention of trading one of the excess LD for 1RD. What if that player isn't available? Now you are trading the LD for a 2RD + a pick to make up the value. That's cool, but the team didn't need a 2RD, they needed a 1RD. You could've just drafted the 1RD.

Obviously if the talent difference is huge, you don't take a guy based on need. But if it's a toss up who is going to be better, take the guy you need. If you're building a team through the draft, at some point you have to consider team needs.
If you have a 1LD, you are perfectly fine putting a 2D on the other side, and vice versa. Even when the Ducks had 2 legit 1D, they typically didn’t play together.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

  • Brazil vs Colombia
    Brazil vs Colombia
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $14,538.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Costa Rica vs Paraguay
    Costa Rica vs Paraguay
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $50.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad