TojoP
Registered User
- Jun 11, 2025
- 2,187
- 2,597
We'll just explain to Howard what life under Babcock would be likeI can’t imagine Howard being happy with just signing with them after 4 years of college, only to get traded.
We'll just explain to Howard what life under Babcock would be likeI can’t imagine Howard being happy with just signing with them after 4 years of college, only to get traded.
"With the 22nd pick in the 2026 NHL Entry Draft, the Pittsburgh Penguins select......."What will be the first impactful move that the Pens make?
Byram still has some runway to round out his game - and OFD generally take awhile. Nurse is on the downslope of his career.
Dependent on price, I'd much rather have Byram.
It’s Darnell Nurse and bringing back Jansen Harkins, and you’ll be happy with it!"Big game hunting" and "Bowen Byram" don't go together very well for me. Not super interested in him and the absurd contract he'll get.
If that's Kyle's big summer move consider me underwhelmed
I think with how much money we have going forward in a rising cap. The risk is minimal financially for Nurse.I mean, to be fair, we'd be paying Nurse a fortune and his play could just as easily fall off a cliff after being away from McDrai.
But yeah, getting paid to take Nurse sounds better than paying to get Byram but that's with the caveat that we use the payment from Nurse to make other moves.
I also don't hate the idea of doing both. Move Girard to anywhere, pay to get Byram, get paid to get Nurse.
Spoon-EK
Byram-Letang
Nurse-XXXXX
For people who are expecting the Pens to tear it all down, no, Byram makes no sense.Getting Nurse for Free/picks>>>>> paying a fortune for Byram and then paying him a fortune.
Giving up 1sts for Byram when we could fall off a cliff in any given year. Is a nightmare idea.
If we could get Byram for minimal value. I’d be down to trade for him.
I tend to agree. IF we are trading the 22ov, I would rather it be traded to trade up to get Viggo (even at the expense of a roster player or prospect or two).I think with how much money we have going forward in a rising cap. The risk is minimal financially for Nurse.
Byram will get 10+ with protections. We likely will have to give a 1st maybe 2.
I just don’t think we are in a position to give 1sts up. If we didn’t have to give 1sts. Sure get Byram and pay him whatever the money doesn’t matter at all right now.
Most important thing is to get Viggo.
You can kill that person and no jury will convict.I will jump off a f***ing cliff the first time I hear "Ghostbusters? Oh you mean that one with Melissa McCarthy!?"
Penguins not mentioned here by Pagnotta.
The Oilers probably want to trade him before his 6m signing bonus hits on July 1st. They'll have to pay more or receive value back of course but the Owner probably doesn't care about that
His signing bonus is spread throughout the year, so July 1st doesn't matter.
I think it's more about wanting to have that cap space opened up by July 1st to be active in UFA.
Throw in Poulin and you have yourself a deal!It’s Darnell Nurse and bringing back Jansen Harkins, and you’ll be happy with it!
Who are his comps, seems tinyEveryone with a brain likes Bjorck. Everything I hear about him leads me to believe he’s going to be the best center taken, and maybe the best forward.
I have no clue what Nashville is or wants to be. I don't think Trotz knew either. People cried here "There is no plan!" but you can point to Trotz as a guy who literally had no plan. I'd like to get Hague from them. I see him as an ideal partner for Letang.I'm just spit-balling here, but what if new GM MacFarland wants to shed a contract as his first Predators move? Since he is familiar with Girard, maybe Skjei and 10 for Girard and 22 makes some sense for all?
Skjei has a 15-team NTC, so we might be on it potentially. And if not Skjei, maybe it's Hague. Anyway, we have focused mainly on pick No. 9 but maybe pick 10 could be had.
I don't see cap space as motivation for Nashville to shed a contract as they have a full roster right now with $23M in cap space with a lot more cap space coming in the next 1-2 years (Stamkos $8M, O'Reilly $4.5M, Josi $9M). Both Skjei and Hague are probably pretty even value, so I don't think they would have to pay to get rid of them. Hague isn't very good so I don't think he would be a flip candidate in a year or two.I'm just spit-balling here, but what if new GM MacFarland wants to shed a contract as his first Predators move? Since he is familiar with Girard, maybe Skjei and 10 for Girard and 22 makes some sense for all?
Skjei has a 15-team NTC, so we might be on it potentially. And if not Skjei, maybe it's Hague. Anyway, we have focused mainly on pick No. 9 but maybe pick 10 could be had.
I do agree with these thoughts. But I also don’t think a tear it down is happening. Most have agreed that it’s just coming in a few years when Sid is slowing down or done.For people who are expecting the Pens to tear it all down, no, Byram makes no sense.
For Dubas's stated plan of aquiring players in their 20s to retooll around, Byram makes a ton of sense (IF you believe he's on the upswing). He's the same age as Chinakhov having just turned 25 last week. He checks off a major need as a puck mover and PPQB to replace Karlsson that they don't have and don't have anywhere at any level of the organization.
I'd honestly wouldn't mind if they added Byram and traded Karlsson to recoup draft capital, though more likely it's Rakell. But I understand not everyone views him as a guy whose game is coming together after being stunted early by concussions like I do and don't want to try to convince the board.
Some article was speculating McFarland might want to reunite with Byram?I was just going on the assumption that MacFarland would want to change how the Preds play, with more puck movers. Also, GMs sometimes inherit contracts they do not want.
Anyway, my Viggo Bjorck lust has reached unhealthy proportions. So I will stop now.
I doubt we have the assets or more accurately would be outbid.
Never understood the fascination with him. By the time we're anygood he'll be in his mid 30's. IT'd be a waste."Big game hunting" and "Bowen Byram" don't go together very well for me. Not super interested in him and the absurd contract he'll get.
If that's Kyle's big summer move consider me underwhelmed
I think getting into the top 10 (sans maybe 9ov) might be too tough, as it always is. Question might be, how far does he drop? Say you get to 10ov, if you don't get Bjorck, christ you could get Belchetz, Lawrence, Rudolph, or Smits. Still probably worth it.I was just going on the assumption that MacFarland would want to change how the Preds play, with more puck movers. Also, GMs sometimes inherit contracts they do not want.
Anyway, my Viggo Bjorck lust has reached unhealthy proportions. So I will stop now.