Well, maybe I'm wrong. Or perhaps Perplexity AI is wrong.
In the event, I suspect Rod The Mod will successfully square the circle soon enough.
In the event, I suspect Rod The Mod will successfully square the circle soon enough.
Yes, but that is St Louis, s team constructed for a coach like Montgomery.
Whatever else is true, he did not like the roster Sweeney put together and more or less gave up on them.
With a wink and a nod, back to St louis.
What a guy.
I have no idea.Ok well then answer me this.
Why did Sweeney..
A) construct a roster that suited his coach
Or
B) Hire a coach who’s system didn’t fit the type of roster he wanted to construct?
For the analytic crowd
In fairness 9 rounds won in 7 years w 3 conference finals would go over very well herecarolina being in the top right is hilarious
In fairness 9 rounds won in 7 years w 3 conference finals would go over very well here
In fairness 9 rounds won in 7 years w 3 conference finals would go over very well here
I agree. No bigger frauds than Carolina. It’s like they always have the same team and it’s proven they can’t win it allyou really think so? Maybe with the same crowd ok with regular season success and excuses for the playoff exits, but i think it would be received very similarly to how they're received now
carolina is an anomaly, they receive way lower criticism than they deserve, seemingly the only team that gets away with it
The only way the bruins would get a pass for only making it to the ecf multiple times and getting their shit pushed in each time is if they were not even expected to make it that far to begin with
I think people would have been similarly upset with that record setting team if they had been swept in the ECF vs losing a really close series to the team that went to the finals from the east.
it also brings into question the difference between a team losing game 7 of semi finals vs getting swept in the ECF...there really isn't much of a difference, so why would we give a pass to a team that got just one more win than another?
I think the measure is how each series goes when you fall short of a SC
In fairness 9 rounds won in 7 years w 3 conference finals would go over very well here
Yeah you would think there would be some accountability with the front office from the owner but way too much too ask.Making the final four is an accomplishment- you are in the conversation for the Cup, something the Bruins have managed one time since 2013 depsite being in the playoffs most of those seasons.
You already want to build a statue of Sweeney, no? Imagine if he did what Carolina did the past 7 seasons? Guy has been past round 2 once in a decade and you act like it's crime against the church to want him replaced.
Ok well then answer me this.
Why did Sweeney..
A) construct a roster that suited his coach
Or
B) Hire a coach who’s system didn’t fit the type of roster he wanted to construct?
For the analytic crowd
And you would have fired Jim Nill years ago.You already want to build a statue of Sweeney, no? Imagine if he did what Carolina did the past 7 seasons? Guy has been past round 2 once in a decade and you act like it's crime against the church to want him replaced.
So when Don Sweeney grows up he will be Jim Nill? One guy took over a team who didn't make the play-offs for what 5-6 years before him vs a guy who took over a team that won a cup 4 years earlier, went to a cup 2 years before that and had 117 pts the year before they missed the playoffs with 96 points? Nill took over a last place team if I recall correctly lol. How many hall of famers did Nill inherit?And you would have fired Jim Nill years ago.
It's a results business - I heard that somewhere.So when Don Sweeney grows up he will be Jim Nill? One guy took over a team who didn't make the play-offs for what 5-6 years before him vs a guy who took over a team that won a cup 4 years earlier, went to a cup 2 years before that and had 117 pts the year before they missed the playoffs with 96 points? Nill took over a last place team if I recall correctly lol. How many hall of famers did Nill inherit?
It's about championships. When Nill bottoms out like Sweeney it will be time for him to go as well.It's a results business - I heard that somewhere.
It's about championships. When Nill bottoms out like Sweeney it will be time for him to go as well.
How long should a GM keep his job? I'm ok with a decade, I understand they last longer than coaches., like I said Sweeney did a very good to good job for most of it, but the two year extension speaks volumes, not that highly thought of anymore it would seem.
I can't help but wonder if you're arguing with Sweeney's burner account. The lengths he goes to bend over backwards to defend Sweeney is incredible.You already want to build a statue of Sweeney, no? Imagine if he did what Carolina did the past 7 seasons? Guy has been past round 2 once in a decade and you act like it's crime against the church to want him replaced.