dinodebino
Registered User
- Sep 27, 2017
- 16,390
- 29,531
I think Dom Dom is a good coach. The team has too many slow players for his system.
Sorry, I don't mean to snap at you, but what the f*** does that even mean?I think Bouchard is a more forward thinking coach than Ducharme
Dom Dom doesn’t have a choice, there’s only 1-recall left it’s either Evans, Caufield, another AHL player or keep it for a rainy day.Then don't play Staal over Evans
Kulak over Mete
Weber 20+ a night
He is the coach in name only. @WeThreeKings you told us what to expect from DD but he has not delivered. It's very probable that his hands are tied and has very little control of the roster and being able to coach in the way that he would like to.
Dom Dom doesn’t have a choice, there’s only 1-recall left it’s either Evans, Caufield, another AHL player or keep it for a rainy day.
So many things wrong here. The guy looks like a clown and sounds like one too; how can players have any faith in what he preaches when in his attempt to look cool, he appears to have just gotten out of bed?
He might be an OK assistant and a real nice guy, but he sure as hell ain't on my list of head coach candidates.
Why wasn’t Mete put on waivers prior to deadline day, did MB decide last minute on Monday?Roster management 101, brought to you by the bargain bin academy
Valid question, and yeah I mean it's an opinion based on very superficial observation, it's mostly based on the way the Habs have been playing under Ducharme vs the way the Rocket is playing under Bouchard. One has the big team playing a boring, conservative dump and chase game, the other has his team being relentless, aggressive, far from boring. Maybe it wouldn't translate in the big leagues, but I can't understand why the Habs aren't better with this lineup and honestly, I find the team even more boring and passive under Ducharme than under Julien.Sorry, I don't mean to snap at you, but what the f*** does that even mean?
I see this floating around all the time, but no one seems to be providing a definition of a "forward thinking" coach.
These are different situations, though.Valid question, and yeah I mean it's an opinion based on very superficial observation, it's mostly based on the way the Habs have been playing under Ducharme vs the way the Rocket is playing under Bouchard. One has the big team playing a boring, conservative dump and chase game, the other has his team being relentless, aggressive, far from boring. Maybe it wouldn't translate in the big leagues, but I can't understand why the Habs aren't better with this lineup and honestly, I find the team even more boring and passive under Ducharme than under Julien.
I agree that we can certainly give him the benefit of the doubt, I just don't like the way the team has been playing under him. I also don't like the constant line shuffling. But he's not the first one I want out I'll give you that. That being said, this is a solid roster, deep enough that they should at least play .500 vs the top team and regularly beat the weaker ones. He's also been here for a few years under Julien, so it's not like he hasn't had time to make up his mind about this team first hand.These are different situations, though.
The roster composition is different.
Bouchard had years to implement his philosophy and familiarize himself with the players. He also seems to have some voice in player recruitment for Laval. He has a stacked roster down there.
Ducharme was thrown into a HC position with the team in the middle of a crisis, without training camp and with severly restricted time for training sessions under a grueling schedule. He also has a roster that's likely weaker than Lavals' (relatively, of course) and badly assembled, as it does not allow for the intended playing style.
For all we know Ducharme might be a better NHL coach than Bouchard. There's just no way of telling based on what we've seen so far.
I agree that we can certainly give him the benefit of the doubt, I just don't like the way the team has been playing under him. I also don't like the constant line shuffling. But he's not the first one I want out I'll give you that. That being said, this is a solid roster, deep enough that they should at least play .500 vs the top team and regularly beat the weaker ones. He's also been here for a few years under Julien, so it's not like he hasn't had time to make up his mind about this team first hand.
And Dom seems to be using a dart or a blender now......one guy goes down, and now this?The loss of Gallagher was crucial. His line with Tatar and Danault was clicking well again. His loss has forced DD to shuffle his lines a lot.
Well if Gallagher's loss is enough to explain what we're seeing right now, MB has to go.The loss of Gallagher was crucial. His line with Tatar and Danault was clicking well again. His loss has forced DD to shuffle his lines a lot.
My thoughts are he spent too much time under the discipline of Julien and has learned a bit too much.