Lays
Registered User
- Jan 22, 2017
- 13,558
- 12,637
Problem is Lafreniere will never get PP1 time. Trocheck 100% will be on PP1 where Lafreniere SHOULD be. Trocheck is a Gallant toy.No. He's an improvement over Strome in theory, but we'll need to see how he meshes with Panarin. It may end up a downgrade offensively.
What would put us over the top is a major leap from Lafreniere or Kakko (or even Kravtsov), combined with the continued development of Miller, Schneider, and possibly Jones or Lundkvist.
Even then, it probably takes a TDL acquisition to help mask whatever our biggest weakness is, to truly put us over the top.
We should be in good position for at least the next few years, though.
Problem is Lafreniere will never get PP1 time. Trocheck 100% will be on PP1 where Lafreniere SHOULD be. Trocheck is a Gallant toy.
How are Lafreniere and Kakko supposed to take big steps when there's no chance in hell they get any time on the top PP unit and will maybe get junk time in the last 30 seconds of a PP with Trouba on the point.
Drury also added another Gallant toy Carpenter, we thought Rooney and McKegg were bad...
Another year of the Rangers not gutting their roster so their young players can get PP minutes they haven't remotely earned. Sigh. When will they learn? Same old Rongos. etc.Problem is Lafreniere will never get PP1 time. Trocheck 100% will be on PP1 where Lafreniere SHOULD be. Trocheck is a Gallant toy.
How are Lafreniere and Kakko supposed to take big steps when there's no chance in hell they get any time on the top PP unit and will maybe get junk time in the last 30 seconds of a PP with Trouba on the point.
Drury also added another Gallant toy Carpenter, we thought Rooney and McKegg were bad...
This is serious? How has Lafreniere not earned PP time? He scored 19 even strength goals primarily playing with Goodrow and Chytil with 13:59 ATOI. He was one of the most consistent players in the playoffs.Another year of the Rangers not gutting their roster so their young players can get PP minutes they haven't remotely earned. Sigh. When will they learn? Same old Rongos. etc.
Yeah, add Conor Bedard in there too.Need more choices than:
We will win the cup 100% guaranteed
We will be in the finals
We are worse than Pittsburgh
Panarin was hurt the entire playoffs and playing with a very hurt Strome and had 16 in 20,Yeah this, need growth from the young top picks and in general every cup team fills some holes or needs at the TDL to help out
Also need Panarin to show up in the playoffs
E: I think Trocheck puts them in a better spot than they were with Strome though
Kinda like your posting history….started out strong….then sunk like a stone.Problem is Lafreniere will never get PP1 time. Trocheck 100% will be on PP1 where Lafreniere SHOULD be. Trocheck is a Gallant toy.
How are Lafreniere and Kakko supposed to take big steps when there's no chance in hell they get any time on the top PP unit and will maybe get junk time in the last 30 seconds of a PP with Trouba on the point.
Drury also added another Gallant toy Carpenter, we thought Rooney and McKegg were bad...
It's not. They may not even be able to sign a 4th liner like Motte. They made their choice of 2c and will go with Chytil as 3c.Just think what if the Rangers still target Dubois. Imagine having Mika Vinny and Dubois down the middle. I know its unlikely but if what if they are still targeting Dubois? Could it be possible??
How has he not earned it? He had 2 points in 163 minutes on the PP over the past two seasons. That's the least in the league for players who had that many minutes. The players around him are getting their PP time cut, not getting promoted to the top unit.This is serious? How has Lafreniere not earned PP time? He scored 19 even strength goals primarily playing with Goodrow and Chytil with 13:59 ATOI. He was one of the most consistent players in the playoffs.
It's bullshit mentality like this that cripples the full development of young Rangers forwards and people wonder why they are "busts".
Kreider and Mika were nearly as bad as you say they were. They had 40 points between them and some big goals and no not every one was on the PP. They had their moments of sucking too but they were far more engaged and better than the 2nd line AINEC.They're going to need more than just a step up from the young guys.
Panarin has to be MUCH better. Zibanejad can't take 2 months to get going and Kreider can't become allergic to the corners half way through the playoffs. I'm actually a bit worried about the Zib-Kreider combo. They weren't very good 5v5 in the RS and got murdered in the playoffs. They're going to be Panarin-Strome'd so I hope getting close this year only lights a fire under both of them, but I really, really, really think Kreider would be best served next to Chytil at ES. It's a combo that has always worked and he can still feast on PP1.
I think the team has improved pretty dramatically in their ability to get pucks up the ice, through the NZ and into the offensive zone with control, but the lack of cycle based offense is still going to be an issue. Trocheck helps but he can only play on one line.
You show a little respect to the board rookie of the year, brother.Kinda like your posting history….started out strong….then sunk like a stone.
whining about the PP personnel when our PP was a major strength is such a stupid hill to die on….
Huge fall from grace….in record time too….You show a little respect to the board rookie of the year, brother.
Only sets him up for a redemption tour. Then he'll be the first winner of the board comeback award. Unless we're all unwittingly in an M. Night Shyamalan universe with a BloodyNine plot twist.Huge fall from grace….in record time too….