Crede777
Deputized
- Dec 16, 2009
- 14,828
- 4,548
Yes, but he absolutely better or the pick will be questioned even further.
doesn’t count against a 0-4 teamAnother goal for carlsson @ViD thanks again
It’s been a season where both were injured a bunch and 4 games. Let’s relax.I mean, it's between him and Fantilli and Carlsson has flashed much more throughout his career thus far.
It’s been a season where both were injured a bunch and 4 games. Let’s relax.
Ok makes sense.I pretty clearly say "throughout his career thus far". For all we know, one of the two can suffer some sort of catastrophic injury that derails their career and changes the whole dynamic, but thus far Carlsson has been more impressive, I still have the same concern about Fantilli that I had which led me to having Carlsson over Fantilli initially.
By Who? Unless Fantilli breaks out and Carlson doesn’t, no one in Anaheim will be.Yes, but he absolutely better or the pick will be questioned even further.
By hockey fans. If fans of the team don’t do so, maybe that speaks to a lack of ambition. In Montreal they’ve been questioning their pick, right or wrong, since it was made.By Who? Unless Fantilli breaks out and Carlson doesn’t, no one in Anaheim will be.
I think all 4 of those guys are capable of hitting those numbers, although it might be toughest for fantilli as his deployment probably isn't high enough right now.He better if he wants to keep that hype going
Bedard, Carlsson, Fantilli, and Mitchkov should all be 70+ pt players this year (with bedard closer to 100), if the 2023 draft is trending to be as strong as hyped
By hockey fans. If fans of the team don’t do so, maybe that speaks to a lack of ambition. In Montreal they’ve been questioning their pick, right or wrong, since it was made.