- Oct 10, 2007
- 25,687
- 13,661
Lafleur is a good comparable to me.I'd have no problem putting Kucherov behind Ovi, Jagr and Howe when all is said and done.
Lafleur is a good comparable to me.I'd have no problem putting Kucherov behind Ovi, Jagr and Howe when all is said and done.
Problem with Lafleur is he only really had 7-8 seasons of being a great player and not a whole lot beyond that. Kucherov doesn’t match Lafleur’s 6 year run of being near the top of the leaderboards, but his play over the past 8 seasons hasn’t been far off, including a couple big seasons and playoff dominance. If he stays healthy continues to have a great run into his early 30s, I’d find it hard to take Lafleur
The Art Rosses were also a function of longevity for Jagr, because he mainly won them in years Mario wasn't around. Kucherov has to contend with McDavid, who's probably a notch below Lemieux, which is why Kuch can still win an Art Ross if McDavid is just slightly off.I'm at just below Jagr, hard to argue Jagr doesn't have the same peak but significantly better longevity. And he still has 5 Art Ross's, 3 Lindsays...
Jagr had a 149 point season. He was a winger.Now, that Kucherov has the NHL record for points in a season by a winger, he enters the conversation of being a top 10 or even top 5 winger of all time.
With his regular season accolades and impeccable play off performances, where do you see him by the end of his career ?
Yeah, I mixed points with assistsJagr had a 149 point season. He was a winger.
Mike Bossy had a 147 point season. He was a winger, no? Before my time, but I believe he was.
It seems like he might be in the 6-8 range right now. There are guys it's just impossible to pass without longevity, IMO. Kuch is probably pacing to be in the 5/6 range.I’d love to see someone list ten better wingers than Kucherov. His peak is already (at least) top five but I could understand people keeping him out until his career numbers get there as well; anyone who doesn’t have him in their top ten at this point is just crazy.
I think it's reasonable to assert Kucherov is in the conversation for the best ever playmaking winger. Possibly already #1. He holds the record and his second best season is tied for the previous record. So he has the best and second best assist totals for a winger in a season.Yeah, I mixed points with assists
The Art Rosses were also a function of longevity for Jagr, because he mainly won them in years Mario wasn't around. Kucherov has to contend with McDavid, who's probably a notch below Lemieux, which is why Kuch can still win an Art Ross if McDavid is just slightly off.
But I agree, I would say just below Jagr right now. Although I think Kuch has a chance to get neck and neck with him, or even surpass him by a little bit, if he can keep this up into his mid-thirties.
I wouldn’t go that far. Jagr is arguably the best/2nd best winger of all time with Ovi.Wherever Jagr is, I think Kucherov will rank either just below or just above. Same tier.
Such a bad take. I hate how a lot of historical people may think like you when just looking at stats.Disagree, I prefer Kucherov at his peak to Ovechkin. When did Ovechkin score 145 points?
Kucherov has peaked higher than most of these guys, and the length of his prime is nearing theirs too. He just needs to add a couple more elite seasons and he'll be on his way.They are still well ahead and will be ahead I think
Bossy
Geoffrion
Kharlamov
Lindsay
Selanne
That seems to be the competition to round out top10 wingers of all-time. Is Kucherov's career going to eclipse Selanne's? Is Kucherov's peak better than Kharlamov's? Would you rather have Kucherov for playoffs than Bossy? I am still inclined to say no, but Kucherov can still add to his career quite meaningfully.
There is literally 0% chance I’m putting a guy with 870 career points in the same tier as Howe…he’s got more work to do and might get there, but no way he’s already there.Jagr had a 149 point season. He was a winger.
Mike Bossy had a 147 point season. He was a winger, no? Before my time, but I believe he was.
Either way, while Kucherov hasn't set any record, I voted he's already top 5 all time. Maybe not quite yet....but its close.
Perhaps I'm forgetting some guys...but the first six ones that come to mind that Kucherov is in the same tier as are:
Gordie Howe
Maurice Richard
Jaromir Jagr
Mike Bossy
Alex Ovechkin
Nikita Kucherov
Edit:
Ok, I forgot Bobby Hull and Guy Lafleur. Add them to the above list, but I do feel all eight of those guys are in the same tier (with Howe likely being the top of the list)
I’d add Makarov and Kharlamov to that list. Kucherov slides in just within the top 10.Howe
Jagr
Lafleur
Ovechkin
Richard
Hull
He's in the top 10, but I dont see him knocking off any of the 6 listed.
Wherever Jagr is, I think Kucherov will rank either just below or just above. Same tier.
I wouldn’t go that far. Jagr is arguably the best/2nd best winger of all time with Ovi.
Yeah, I mixed points with assists
I was speaking more about the future. Kucherov will probably be involved in the next few Art Ross races, which is the kind of longevity he would need to really be in this conversation.Sure but there hasn't been a single year he would've came 2nd to McDavid. He would've lost Art Ross's to Giroux and Pastrnak if you removed McDavid from the equation. As we've seen this year, holding 1st place isn't a cake walk. To pass Jagr you need hardware imo. A Hart definitely brings it closer has Jagr only got 1 in his career.
And Kucherov is on the brink of being the 4th/5th player in history to score 100 assists.Dunno about that one.. Jagr drove play at ES to an absurd degree.
And Kucherov is on the brink of being the 4th/5th player in history to score 100 assists.
Not saying he's better than Jagr, but that's definitely Kucherov's tier.
Scoring, in reality, isn't up all that much. It's actually down from last year.Yes but that fact that two players are likely going to do it after 30 years of no one doing it says it is not just the player but also the scoring environment that has changed. What is this tier that you think exists?
I think Kucherov is making a case for later top 10 to top 15 but I'm fairly confident Jagr slots in in the top 5 or so wingers.
Scoring, in reality, isn't up all that much. It's actually down from last year.
I would put Jagr around 5 or 6, and Kucherov slightly below. But I think Kucherov has a chance to catch up if he can extend his prime into his mid-thirties. Kucherov is a good candidate to do that though, given how his game is based mostly on IQ.
Well, it's not being distributed to Kucherov because of any league-wide thing. It's being distributed to Kucherov because the team didn't have a goalie until March.Average scoring is, obviously, a poor proxy for the distribution of scoring going to front liners.