True, but I'm talking about what people were thinking a few years ago (not back in 2009 before Crosby and Malkin even signed these huge deals). Letang is fantastic, but he was missing time due to illness and injuries. This past cup, Letang didn't contribute at all to this recent Stanley cup run so the Pens didn't have a Norris caliber defenseman for the vast majority of this season and all of the playoffs.
He was actually moderately healthy from say 2010 to 2013, he played in 241 of 294 games, which actually isn't that bad. It's like 67 or 68 games in a full season, when he's only at like 55 games in a full season since. When Letang started missing more time in like 2013 and 2014, that's when Martin was playing at his peak and playing like a true #1 defenseman for the Penguins (and that's not an exaggeration either, he was really good).
Just as an aside, the Penguins defense in 2013-2014 was probably the best defense they have had on paper in the Crosby era, if I had to make a guess (if they would have played Despres more, it would be clearly the best). It's debatable between them and 2015-2016, but I think those are the two clear best years on paper for the Penguins defense.
See, that's where I disagree it proves the other guys point for exactly some of the reasons you stated. First off, the Leafs depth is phenomenal and they have a very good prospect pool as well. Once they sign their young players to their next contract, I don't see that depth just going away.
That's completely valid to say, I don't think forward depth will ever be a problem for the Leafs like it was for the Penguins and Capitals over the years. But you also have to question what will happen once guys like Bozak and JVR leave and how well guys like Kapanen and Leivo will be able to replace them, just because that's just the nature of prospects.
Also, their defense, on paper, isn't any worse at the core of it than the Pens was this past season (- Letang), and IMO, will only get better.
I also don't think the Penguins will ever be able to repeat what they did last year and win a cup with that defense. I don't think that season should be an indication that a team can win with a mediocre to poor defense if their offense is good enough, I think it shows a team can win with a mediocre to poor defense if their goalie is hot enough.
They've got a fantastic front office and a great coach.
I find Babcock as a coach to be overrated, same with Lou as a GM, but their front management staff is still very good. I don't think you can question their forwards or front office long term, at worst it will still be good to very good.
Goaltending, you are right in that Murray was elite, but a couple years ago, when I felt people thought that way about the Pens, nobody expected Murray to suddenly come onto the scene and be what he is. I also think Andersen can be better than he was this past season, his first on a new team with a new system.
That's exactly true, which is why you can't assume that will happen. Saying the Penguins had questionable goaltending up until their 2 cup wins (more specifically 2010-2013) is completely valid, and they got insanely lucky with Murray turning out to be what he is already. If Murray wouldn't have come up like he did, the Penguins wouldn't be coming off 2 cups in 2 years. Hell, I don't even know if they'd have 1. That kinda goes back to the point that it's really hard to tell this far into the future. If you would have asked me in 2013 if I ever saw the Penguins winning another within 5 years, I would have said no. They have 2 in 4 years since and now suddenly have a 23 year old elite starting goalie and more top end young wingers than they know what to do with.