Line Combos: Do the Leafs have too many offensive defencemen?
- Thread starter Bomber0104
- Start date
-
Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
robdicks
Registered User
I'd prefer to have an offensive d-man than a defensive one. Defense can be taught. Phaneuf is a two-way, Liles is solid in his own end, Gardiner isn't bad either. Rielly isn't good there yet, but he wouldn't be on the team if we started tomorrow anyways.
Jerkini
Registered User
- May 31, 2003
- 8,398
- 23
The problem is that our goaltending sucks. We had 30-35 games of genuine stud goaltending in Reimer's rookie season, and this team's fortune changed overnight. Unfortunately, it looks like a book was written on him and he has struggled considerably ever since. There's nothing wrong with our defence. It's our goaltending. It's definitely the worst in the NHL.
I believe one of Rielly or Gardiner may be on their way out in a package deal before too long. Once they establish solid trade value for themselves.
I have no issues with Liles' contract. I believe he will be back to his old self (no pun intended) when the season starts up. He's a good mentor for our youngsters, and is from all appearances a great lockerroom presence.
I have no issues with Liles' contract. I believe he will be back to his old self (no pun intended) when the season starts up. He's a good mentor for our youngsters, and is from all appearances a great lockerroom presence.
Jerkini
Registered User
- May 31, 2003
- 8,398
- 23
I have no doubt of that, the question is, how much could he bring as a return. If Burke's hunt for that elusive #1C doesn't go well with all the mess the new CBA will likely create, I feel we may have to part with more valuable pieces/prospects in a package deal.
Jerkini
Registered User
- May 31, 2003
- 8,398
- 23
I meant he'll be tradable for a prospect + pick, similar to the Kaberle deal but not quite that high a price . Package deal for a #1C? In our dreams
achtungbaby
Registered User
- Oct 31, 2006
- 4,792
- 25
Really? So Burke knew in January that he was going to be selecting Rielly at the 2012 draft? This whole "stop-gap" thing has gone a little too far.
Its funny how some fans think how easy it is to acquire a goalie and a center. I think we have been granted with a wonerful gm that has brought in some good pieces for scraps and think it should be the same every trade. Even aa had to give up some value for dickey
Yes we have too many.
We are way too soft.
Liles should be moved because Gardiner is ready enough to play, Holzer needs NHL experience, and Gunn is not going anywhere.
We are way too soft.
Liles should be moved because Gardiner is ready enough to play, Holzer needs NHL experience, and Gunn is not going anywhere.
achtungbaby
Registered User
- Oct 31, 2006
- 4,792
- 25
Maybe we can get a 2nd round pick for him from a team making a playoff drive.
Drew311
Makes The Pass
- Oct 29, 2010
- 11,902
- 2,381
You never know, maybe Burke is planning on moving one of Gardiner or Rielly in a package for a #1 centre?
Leafs seem to be very high on Liles and they can use a veteran leader on the back end. Komisarek can't even tie his own skates, and will most likely be gone next year. It's high risk to have all of Gardiner, Rielly, Holzer and Franson on the same squad.
Leafs seem to be very high on Liles and they can use a veteran leader on the back end. Komisarek can't even tie his own skates, and will most likely be gone next year. It's high risk to have all of Gardiner, Rielly, Holzer and Franson on the same squad.
Why do I have a feeling that Leaf fans would be angry for a move like that. I would hope they wouldn't be resistant.
Commander Clueless
Apathy of the Leaf
- Sep 10, 2008
- 15,962
- 3,976
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Liles' cap hit was actually higher when the Leafs traded for him, was it not?
To me, Phaneuf isn't an offensive defenseman in the same sense that Liles, Gardiner and Rielly are. Neither is Franson. Phaneuf is more two way than the others.
Still I agree, Liles Gardiner and Rielly on the same time is a recipe for disaster. We need more effective defensive types as well.
Liles, while a very good player, is likely on his way out when Rielly makes the team. We could afford to trade Liles or other offensive prospects for more solid defensive guys.
bobermay
Registered User
The Liles hate is astonishing. He's a really solid player.
To be honest, I really don't want to rush Reilly. Heck, send him to the Juniors for another year. It won't hurt his development, especially since if Moose Jaw isn't good next year, they will trade him to a contender. Its like the Peitrangelo treatment. I believe it helped Peitrangelo a TON not rushing him the way St. Louis did. Could do wonders from Reilly as well.
To be honest, I really don't want to rush Reilly. Heck, send him to the Juniors for another year. It won't hurt his development, especially since if Moose Jaw isn't good next year, they will trade him to a contender. Its like the Peitrangelo treatment. I believe it helped Peitrangelo a TON not rushing him the way St. Louis did. Could do wonders from Reilly as well.
Bomber0104
Registered User
I'm not looking at cap hit so much as the full dollar value of the contract.
Liles is more expensive now than he was last year.
Well Phaneuf is known to be erratic defensively and that's why he's always had a defensive defenceman play with him the NHL whether it be Robyn Regher or Keith Aulie or Carl Gunnarsson. Most coaches seem to like to insulate Phaneuf's sloppy defensive play with a stay at home player (which Gardiner, Rielly, and Liles are simply not).
Seems to suggest at least one of these players can't be on this team in 1 to 2 years time (when Rielly should break in the lineup).
Maybe Rielly gets the third pairing minutes. What if he is actually as good as the hype though? What if he forces the issue to get more minutes because he is that good?
He shouldn't be playing with Phaneuf or Gardiner.
Would Gardiner and his agent be pleased with third pairing minutes?
Drew311
Makes The Pass
- Oct 29, 2010
- 11,902
- 2,381
I think the reason why Phaneuf has been historically paired with stay at home defensemen is because he has been given the freedom to rush the puck and jump into the play in the offensive zone. Coaches know this is when Phaneuf is at his best, and he needs a partner that is willing to stay back and be ready for the possible odd man rush which could occur from Phaneuf being so aggressive. Everyone expects Phaneuf to be some stud two-way defenseman who should never make a mistake in the defensive zone. This will never be the case. He's either going to be an offensive puck rushing threat or be transformed into a strong stay at home defenseman. Personally, I hope Carlyle doesn't try to turn him into the latter.
Bomber0104
Registered User
James Wisniewski Cap Hit: $5,500,000 for 6 years 27 pts
Christian Ehrhoff Cap Hit: $4,000,000 for 10 years 32 pts
Matt Carle Cap Hit: $5,500,000 for 6 years 38 pts
JML Cap Hit: $3,875,000 for 5 years 27 pts
Compared to other with a similar skill set I think JML took a pay cut on that contract for what he brings. (Also bare in mind JML suffered a concussion and missed significant time and when he did come back was a shadow of his former self.)
