FriendlyGhost92
Registered User
- Jun 22, 2023
- 4,383
- 5,268
I posted his xG numbers, didn't look at QoC sorry, it's not right there on NS.
I accept your apology.
I posted his xG numbers, didn't look at QoC sorry, it's not right there on NS.
I accept your apology.
I used the larger sample, it's not like I hid the fact that they were last year's numbers. Typically I'd use combined seasons but I'm on my phone at the airport and it takes a while to compile those numbers. Seider has also benefited greatly from playing alongside Edvinsson this year.That's up to you I guess. He made a bad faith argument though.
Basically if someone didn't have an agenda the natural thing to do is compare this year's stats, not last year's stats. We're 30+ games into the season that's a large enough sample size. Plus Vlasic was a rookie last year (which he mentioned) so last year's stats are even less applicable than they otherwise would be.
Here's what you find from a cursory top level look (2024-2025 5v5 via NST):
Vlasic:
2.51 xGA/60
44.84 xG%
-0.1 rel xGA/60
-0.29 rel xG%
Seider:
2.44 xGA/60
45.99 xG%
-0.08 rel xGA/60
+0.24 rel xG%
So defensively, basically the same (at least looking at it just from a cursory top level). But yeah, saying some version of 'the defensive numbers clearly show Vlasic is better defensively' is straight up nonsense, personally I believe this proactive attempt at misdirection was intentional
Your excuse was using the larger sample and yet you want to use the smaller sample this year to concede that Seider is only "Probably" better offensively.I used the larger sample, it's not like I hid the fact that they were last year's numbers. Typically I'd use combined seasons but I'm on my phone at the airport and it takes a while to compile those numbers. Seider has also benefited greatly from playing alongside Edvinsson this year.
But of course you attribute it to "bad faith" because you're still salty about me saying Bedard doesn't have McDavid upside.
Combining the last 2 years and it's clearly Vlasic.
That's up to you I guess. He made a bad faith argument though.
His ES production last year wasn't that far behind Seider's. While playing for the worst offensive team in the league.Your excuse was using the larger sample and yet you want to use the smaller sample this year to concede that Seider is only "Probably" better offensively.
Convenient.
His ES production last year wasn't that far behind Seider's. While playing for the worst offensive team in the league.
This year he's started getting more PP time, and significantly improved his overall offensive game.
You don't need numbers for this, just watch him play. But it's convenient that the numbers support this, even in a smaller sample. He's become an offensive force.
I used the larger sample, it's not like I hid the fact that they were last year's numbers. Typically I'd use combined seasons but I'm on my phone at the airport and it takes a while to compile those numbers. Seider has also benefited greatly from playing alongside Edvinsson this year.
But of course you attribute it to "bad faith" because you're still salty about me saying Bedard doesn't have McDavid upside.
Combining the last 2 years and it's clearly Vlasic.
You inserted yourself into a discussion by attacking me, without even knowing what player I'm discussing. Then you make multiple other posts calling me a bad faith poster.There you go bringing up Bedard again. Guess it was only a matter of time before you tried to threadjack your own thread...
I had their individual pages open, it takes forever to load a single team pages on my phone, let alone two. I didn't conceal the fact that those were last year's numbers. Hilarious that you think this is some grand effort to deceive. That just reinforces to me that this is the way you operate.Meanwhile, NST is pretty simple to use -- if you want to combine seasons you change the 'from' and 'thru' fields, there's a drop down. Here's what I mean:
View attachment 948133
Equally easy to use on your phokene, the fields are quite large. No calculation required.
You inserted yourself into a discussion by attacking me, without even knowing what player I'm discussing. Then you make multiple other posts calling me a bad faith poster.
If anyone is a derailing the thread, it's you and your obsession with me, which has been a thing for you since I said Bedard couldn't be McDavid.
I had their individual pages open, it takes forever to load a single team pages on my phone, let alone two. I didn't conceal the fact that those were last year's numbers. Hilarious that you think this is some grand effort to deceive. That just reinforces to me that this is the way you operate.
Talk about bad faith arguments...If you ever decide to stop making bad faith arguments, neither me nor FriendlyGhost nor anyone else will ever come after you for making bad faith arguments.
It really is that simple.
Talk about bad faith arguments...
I'm done dealing with your nonsense. Obsess about someone else. You've followed me into 3 separate threads since Sunday to attack me, your post history is comical at this point.
Yeah, I'm not sure that's the case. Here's a link to my post activity, you can take a look for yourself: https://forums.hfboards.com/members/painforshane.325083/#latest-activity