Canada4Gold
Registered User
- Dec 22, 2010
- 43,048
- 9,236
it's a failure in the sense that trying to jump over the grand canyon and not doing it is a failure. You weren't going to do any better to begin with.
it's a failure in the sense that trying to jump over the grand canyon and not doing it is a failure. You weren't going to do any better to begin with.
Because that relates to baseball very well.
Halladay was only going to accept a trade to Philadelphia. And what the Jays got was basically 3 of their best 5 prospects. It's a pretty safe assumption that was the best offer the Jays were gonna get.
I was thinking about this last night when I was having trouble sleeping.
What would this team look like right now if it hadn't decided to try to vault itself to instant contender status with the Marlins and then Mets trades? Where would the Jays be if they had of kept up their steady rebuild and acquiring prospects.
Here's what I came up with. Obviously I had to make a few assumptions. But my main assumption is they kept the majority of their players and continued with the steady rebuilding.
1B: EE
2B: Goins/Kawasaki/Getz/Diaz
SS: Hechavarria
3B: Lawrie
C: d'Arnaud
LF: Gose/Sierra
CF: Rasmus
RF: Bautista
DH: Lind
C2: Arencibia (I assume the Jays would have held a young talent like him as a back up)
Plus three bench players
SP: Morrow
SP: Happ
SP: Alvarez
SP: Hutchison
SP: McGowan/Rogers/Redmond/Another free agent they signed
RP: Janssen
RP: Santos
RP: Delabar
RP: Cecil
RP: McGowan/Rogers/Redmond
RP: McGowan/Rogers/Redmond (1 in rotation, two in BP)
RP: Loup
Still in the system: Marisnick, Nicolino, Syndergaard. Plus the other guys in those trades that I have never heard of.
Can anybody say that lineup would be performing significantly worse than what we're seeing now? And, Syndergaard, Stroman, Sanchez, Nolin would all be on the cusp of joining the rotation to go with Alvarez and Hutch.
Obviously there would be significant drop offs in LF and SS (although, to be blunt: Reyes has sucked this year). And the rotation is still a disaster, but honestly, would Happ and Alvarez be THAT big of a difference between the performances of Dickey and Buerhle (who I think we all agree will probably start to trend back towards his normal output as the season moves on).
Gose and Tolleson were called up.
Diaz sent down and Sierra DFA.
You should get at least one player that will be good especially when you are trading one of the best pitchers in the game.
It doesn't matter if Philly was the only team, the trade looks like a complete failure.
Gose and Tolleson were called up.
Diaz sent down and Sierra DFA.
That's how prospects work. You aren't guaranteed anything. D'Arnaud who still has a chance to be good"unfortunately not with us" was part of a huge trade for us. Gose who was acquired with a prospect from the Halladay trade is the best of the three involved in that. It's not AA's fault that Gose regressed for whatever reason. Gose should be to us what Hamilton is to the Reds. Drabek has had serious injuries and you can't fault AA for that. He comes from a hell of a pedigree and his ceiling was higher than his fathers I believe. That is a hell of a return for a player in the last year of his contract that has indicated he was leaving once his contract was up and would only accept a trade to one team.
I know what your saying with all of this and that's the painful part. That they made all those moves for really really strong talent and we've really seen no true benefit from it. As to your post you could leave Cabrera in because he was signed as a free agent and the same goes for Izturis. Although without the Marlins trade we still have Yunel Escobar who would obviously be our ss.
With Gose called up, I think we can assume that he has now made the Jays full time, unless he totally flops.
Reyes is upset with the team: http://www.tsn.ca/blogs/scott_macarthur/?id=450920